Journal Archive

Platinum Metals Rev., 1990, 34, (1), 2

Platinum Group Metals in Phase Transfer Catalysis

  • By Ernest S. Gore
  • Johnson Matthey,, West Deptford, New Jersey, U.S.A.

Article Synopsis

Phase transfer catalysis is an elegant method for ameliorating the reaction conditions of many organic reactions and improving yields and selectivities. A review is presented of the role and scope of the compounds of the platinum group metals as cocatalysts under phase transfer conditions. The most useful improvements have been found in reactions involving the formation of carbon-carbon bonds such as in carbonylations and vinylations, and in reductions with formate.

The concept of phase transfer catalysis arose about 30 years ago as a solution to the problem of facilitating reaction between organic substrates immiscible in water and inorganic species insoluble in non-aqueous solvents (1, 2). Since then the field has burgeoned with over 2700 citations in Chemical Abstracts as of the end of 1988. Present day commercial usage is estimated to involve 50 to 75 applications and over 50 million pounds per year of products (2, 3). Such an impressive growth has been due to the manifold advantages of phase transfer catalysis:

  • improved selectivity

  • increased reaction rates

  • milder reaction conditions

  • reduced energy requirements

  • simplified isolation and purification methods

  • reduced consumption of organic solvents

  • elimination of need for expensive solvents

  • allows the use of cheaper raw materials, especially oxidants

  • elimination of need for rigorous drying of organic solvents

  • very broad scope of action—numerous reaction types possible.

Although general reviews of phase transfer catalysis (2-23) and some reviews of phase transfer catalysis with transition metal compounds (24-29) have been published, it is the purpose of this article to review the role played by compounds of the platinum group metals as cocatalysts in phase transfer catalysis with emphasis on the scope of the reactions rather than on mechanisms.


Carbonylations by palladium are very sensitive to reaction conditions, the product distribution being particularly dependent on the nature of the palladium complex and the organic solvent. This is illustrated in the Figure for the carbonylation of benzylic halides. Carbonylation gives the expected carboxylic acid when either Pd(PPh3)4 or Pd(diphos)2, where diphos is 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane, is used in the absence of a phase transfer catalyst (30); however, when Pd(diphos)2 is used in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst (31), the course of the reaction changes dramatically, as shown in the Figure, esters being formed.

An attempt was made to control the stereospecificity of the carbonylation of PhCH(Me)Br using a palladium catalyst formed in situ by the addition of an optically active phosphorus compound to Pd(dba)2, where dba is dibenzylideneacetone. Yields were poor and in only one case was there a significant enantiomeric excess of the product (32). In the absence of any phosphine ligand only the coupled product, PhCH(Me)CH(Me)Ph, was obtained with Pd(dba)2 (33). When Pd(PPh3)4 was used, a mixture of the acid (36 per cent) and the ester PhCH(Me)COOCH(Me)Ph (19 per cent) was obtained (30).

This schematic diagram of the carbonylation of benzylic halides catalysed by palladium complexes shows typical products formed during phase transfer catalysis, with (a) 5N NaOH/1 atm CO/Ph2O/BzEt3NCl/80-84°C/7-9 hours (31); 30 per cent NaOH/5 atm CO/xylene/Bu4NI/95°C/5 hours/excess PPh3 (34) (b) 5N NaOH/1 atm CO/CH2Cl2/C6.H 13.NHSO4/room temperature/6-10 hours (31)

The catalyst Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 has been used to selectively carbonylate phenyl halides having more than one halide (24, 34). In each case only one halide was displaced. Thus p -dibromobenzene gave p -bromobenzoic acid (conversion 90 per cent, selectivity 95 per cent), and 1,3,5-trichlorobenzene gave 3,5-dichloro-benzoic acid (selectivity 97 per cent).

The organic solvent markedly affects the course of reaction in the palladium catalysed carbonylation of vinyllic dibromides, RCH = CBr2. When R is phenyl coupling occurs in benzene to give PhC≡CC≡CPh in 54 per cent yield, while in t -amyl alcohol carbonylation occurs giving PhCH = C(COOH)2 in 93 per cent yield (35). Coupling does not occur when R is aliphatic. Thus for R=EtCHMe a mixture of the monoacid and diacid is obtained, in benzene giving 64 per cent RCH = CHCOOH and in t -amyl alcohol giving 82 per cent RCH=C(COOH)2. Vinyllic bromides, RCH = CHBr, are carbonylated in good yields to the expected acid using Pd(diphos)2 or Pd(PPh3)4 (36), although in the latter case the reaction can also proceed without a phase transfer catalyst.

Esters can be prepared via solid-liquid phase transfer catalysis from organic halides and alcohols (37). Thus Pd(PPh3)2Cl2/l-7 atm CO/NaHCO3/ethyl alcohol/Bu4 NI was used to facilitate the preparation of ethyl esters from a variety of aliphatic and aryl halides. Yields were 56-95 per cent, but dropped to less than 30 per cent in the absence of a phase transfer catalyst. Phase transfer catalysis with Pd(OAc)2 provides a modest enhancement in the yields of anhydrides from carbon monoxide, aryl halides, and carboxylic acid salts (38).

The system PdBr 2 /Mn(acac) 2 /NaOH/Bu4NBr, where acac is 2,5-pentanedione, was used to synthesise diphenyl carbonate in 60 per cent yield from phenol, carbon monoxide and oxygen (39). Many phase transfer catalysts were examined and the wide range of yields obtained illustrates the necessity of optimising such reactions with respect to the phase transfer catalyst. Under similar conditions, alkyl carbonates can be produced from aliphatic alcohols (40).

Efforts have been made (41-44) to improve the recovery of rhodium from commercial hydroformylation processes which use rhodium catalysts, Equation [i], by employing phase transfer conditions. Both phase transfer catalysis and rhodium-phosphine complexes with amphiphilic phosphine ligands, such as Ph2P(CH2)2N+Me3 (41), (3-H03SC6H4)3P (42, 44) and Ph2PC6H4COOH (43), were investigated.



The Heck vinylation, Equation [ii], of organic halides is an extremely valuable method of synthesising carbon-carbon bonds (45).


In the absence of phase transfer catalysis these reactions can be slow, and require high temperatures (>100°C) and long reaction times, and the yields are not always good. Phase transfer catalysis has been shown to improve the yields and stereospecificity and to allow thereactions to proceed at room temperature. A series of aromatic iodides, RC6H4I, was vinylated with CH2=CHR1, in excellent yields, 80-97 Percent, using the system Pd(OAc)2/NaHCO3/Bu4NCl/DMF, where DMF is N, N‘ ´-dimethyl formamide, at roomtemperature (46). The product was exclusivelythe (E ) isomer. A similar system,Pd(OAc)2/K2C03/Bu4NCl/DMF was also used to study the vinylation of (E )- and (Z )-C4H9CH=CHI (47). Excellent stereospecificities for the (E, E ) isomer of the product were achieved even when the substrate was the (Z ) isomer. Various alkynyl iodides have been vinylated at room temperature in 40-60 per cent yield to (E )-methylenoates and methylenyones using the systems Pd(OAc)2/K2C03 or Na2C03/Bu4NCl/DMF (48).

Under the same conditions, when allyl alcohols are reacted, Equation [iii] below:


two isomers can be produced (46). Using Pd(OAc)2/NaHCO3/Bu4NCl/DMF, (a) was produced with high selectivity and yield (82-94 per cent). Very recently, it has been shown that high selectivity can be achieved under non phase transfer conditions when the reaction is properly optimised (49).

The addition of organic halides to alkynes has also been investigated; thus reaction [iv] shows yields of 24-87 per cent with almost complete stereospecificity using the system Pd(PPh3)4/CuI/C6H6/NaOH/BzEt3NCl (50).




Phase transfer catalysts have been used in an attempt to improve the yield of the Wacker reaction, [v].


Although the yields are generally good, only in a few cases is there an improvement compared with the yields obtained without using phase transfer catalysts (some comparisons are given in Table I). The oxidation of styrene was unusual (51) as the product distribution was significantly different under phase transfer conditions (Table I). Wacker type oxidations under phase transfer conditions using rhodium and ruthenium catalysts were inferior to those using palladium (52). However the fact that moderately good yields were obtained with ruthenium is significant, since oxidations with ruthenium generally lead to cleavage of the double bond (53, 54). Examples of cleavage under phase transfer conditions are given in Table II. Again, with a few exceptions, there is usually little improvement in yields compared with non phase transfer conditions (53-55).

Phase transfer catalysis in the Wacker reaction with cyclodextrins is notable, as the olefin is transferred to the aqueous phase where oxidation takes place; on the other hand quaternary ammonium salts transfer the olefin to the organic phase. Internal olefins are not oxidised using quaternary ammonium salts (56), but are oxidised using β-cyclodextrin (51). Thus cis - and trans-MeCH= CHMe are oxidised to 2-butanone in 76 per cent and 70 per cent yields, respectively. The yield of methyl ketone from straight chain olefins peaks when the carbon chain of the substrate is nine carbon atoms long (57).

No doubt this is related to the hole size of the cyclodextrin. Internal olefins are also oxidised using PEG-400 (58), where PEG is polyethyleneglycol, although a significant amount of double bond migration also occurs. Yields decrease when either shorter, PEG-200, or longer, PEG-1000, chain lengths are used.

Aromatic Hydrocarbons

In most cases subjecting aromatic compounds to oxidative phase transfer conditions results in oxidation of an aliphatic side chain. Methylbenzenes were oxidised with Ru-Cl3/NaOCI/Bu4NBr/CH2ClCH2Cl and the products depended on the electronic properties of the non methyl substituent (68). When the substituent was H or electron withdrawing, for example, NO2, halide or NO, the methyl group was oxidised, to a carboxyl group in yields of 93-98 per cent. Electron donating groups resulted in ring chlorination.

The system RuCl3/H2O2/DDAB, whereDDAB is (C10H22)2Me2NBr, was used to ox-idise the side chains of aromatic rings (69) ingood yields, but the selectivity was usually notvery good. Tetralin was oxidised to α-tetralonewith this system in 65 per cent yield (69), andwith RuO2/NalO4/C6H6/Adogen-464 in 74per cent yield (70). Ring cleavage occurred,resulting in a mixture of phthalic acid and3-methyl-phthalic acid, when I-methylnaphthalene was oxidised with Ru02/NalO4/C6H6/Adogen-464 (70).


There are many methods available for the platinum group metals catalysed oxidation of alcohols (53, 54). Indeed, when properly optimised, some of these reactions have given results equal to those employing phase transfer conditions. Thus although high yields have been obtained under phase transfer conditions using RuO2/NaIO4 (71) or RuCl3/NaBrO3 (72), the same oxidations can be carried out in the absence of a phase transfer catalyst in equally high yield when the reaction conditions are finely tuned. For example, oxidations with RuO2/NaBrO3 have been performed in the absence of phase transfer catalysts in nearly quantitative yields (73), and the addition of acetonitrile to the conventional RuO2/NaIO4/CCl4 system dramatically improves yields in many cases (55).

Phase transfer catalysis provides a definite benefit in the case of oxidations with Ru/H2O2. No oxidation of alcohols takes place in the absence of a phase transfer catalyst; instead ruthenium metal precipitates and the hydrogen peroxide is catalytically decomposed to oxygen (74).

When a phase transfer catalyst is added, yields of 60-100 per cent are obtained, primary alcohols being converted into aldehydes and secondary alcohols into ketones.

Some oxidations involving transfer between a solid and a liquid phase are greatly enhanced by phase transfer catalysis. Thus the oxidation of primary and secondary alcohols to aldehydes and ketones, respectively, takes place in high yields with the phase transfer systems Pd(OAc)2/NaHCO3/PhI/Bu4NaCl/DMF (75) or RuCl3/Na2CO3/CCl4/DDAB (76).


Reductions with Hydrogen

Rhodium complexes with. amphophilic phosphine ligands have been used to reduce unsaturated organic compounds with hydrogen (77) 78). Benzene derivatives were reduced to cyclohexane derivatives under mild conditions using the system [Rh(1,5-hexadiene)Cl]2/1-2 atm H2/CH2ClCH2Cl/H2O/Aliquat-336/room temperature (79), or RhCl3/2 atm H2/CH2ClCH2/H2O/Aliquat-336/room temperature (80).

The latter system was also employed in reducing acetylenes to olefins, and therefore is the phase transfer analog of the Lindlar catalyst (81) (palladium poisoned with lead supported on calcium carbonate). Like the Lindlar catalyst, which gives mainly cis products, the phase transfer conditions could be adjusted to give mainly the cis isomers, although the selectivity is not as high as that usually achieved with the Lindlar catalyst.

Table I

Oxidation of Some Olefins to Methyl Ketones with Oxygena A Comparison with non Phase Transfer Conditions

Substrate Products Conditions Yield, per cent Reference
1-dodecene 2-dodecanone PdCI2/CuCI2/DMF 87 59
1-dodecene 2-dodecanone PdCl2/CuC2/CTAB/n -C1OH22/ n -C5F12b 98 60
1-dodecene 2-dodecanone PdCI2/CuCI2/CTAB 62 56
1-decene 2-decanone PdCI2/CuCI2/DMF 73 61
1-decene 2-decanone PdCI2/CuCI2/CTAB 73 56
1-decene 2-decanone PdCI2/CuCI2/cr-CD 76 57
1-decene 2-decanone RhCI3/CuCI2/CTAB 44 52
1-decene 2-decanone RuCI2(PPh3)3/CTAB 64 52
1-decene 2-decanone PdCI2/CuCI2/PEG-400c 60 58
1-butene 2-butanone PdCI2/PMVb 14 62
1-butene 2-butanone PdCI2/CuCI2/CTABd 65 56
1-butene 2-butanone PdCI2/CuCI2/PEG-400c 71 58
1-butene 2-butanone PdClj/PMV/CTAB/CoH^’ 85 62
styrene PhCH2CHO PdCI2/CuCI2/CH3CN 44 63
styrene PhCOCH3 PdCI2/CuCI2//β-CD 80 51
  PhCHO   10  
  PhCH2CHO   10  

1 atm O2, unless otherwise noted

400 psi O2

200 psi O2

180 psi O2

CTAB = cetyltrimethylammonium bromide

CD = cyclodextrin

PMV = phospho-6-molybdo-6-vanadic acid

Table II

Oxidative Cleavage of Olefins

Substrate Products Conditions Yield, per cent Reference
1-octene CH3(CH2)5COOH RuO2/H5lO6/hexane/(C12H28)3N 93 64
cis -4-octene CH3(CH2)3COOH Ru02/NaOCI/NaOH/CH2CI2/Bu4NBr 84 65
1-pentadecene CH3(CH2),2COOH Ru02/NaOCI/NaOH/CH2CI2/Bu4NBr 100 65
styrene PhCHO RuCI3/H2O2/CH2CICH2CI/DDAB 64 66
  PhCOOH   6
  styrene oxide   4
styrene PhCHO PdCI2/H202/CH2CICH2CI/DDAB 12 66
  PhCOOH   14
  PhCOCH3   56
styrene PhCHO [(bpy)2(py)RuO]+/NaOCI/ 47 67
  styrene oxide CH2CI2/BDTC 13
trans -stilbene PhCHO [(bpy)2(py)RuO]2+/NaOCI/ 42 67
  styrene oxide CH2CI2/BDTC 7
cis -stilbene PhCHO [(bpy)2(py)RuO]2+/NaOCI/ 35 67


Under these conditions hydrogenolysis of halides tends to occur; thus 59 per cent of the fluorine in fluorobenzene and all the chlorine in chlorobenzene are removed (80).

The system RhCl3/1 atm H2/ CH2ClCH2Cl/H2O/Aliquat-336 has also been used to reduce α,β unsaturated esters, ketones, and carboxylic acids at the carbon-carbon double bond with yields of 87-96 per cent (82).

Imines have been reduced to the corresponding amine in the three phase system [ Rh(PPh3)2(I,5-cyclooctadiene)] PF6 /I atm H2/ether/H2O/Triton X-100/solid imine/room temperature (83). The choice of solvent was critical; no reaction occurred in PEG/water or toluene/water.

Reductions with Formate

Formate has been used to reduce a variety of organic substrates under phase transfer conditions. For example, PhCH=CHOPh was reduced to PhCH2CH2COPh by NaOOCH with RuCl2(PPh3)3/o -C6H4Cl2/H2O/(C6-H13)4NHSO4 at 109°C in 99 per cent yield (84).

Other α,β unsaturated carbonyl compounds were also reduced successfully at the carbon-carbon double bond. The best phase transfer catalyst was (C 6 H,13) 4 NHSO 4, which gave quantitative reduction in minutes; others required hours.

Saturated aldehydes and ketones are reduced to alcohols at 90°C using Aliquat-336 (85). The best catalyst for aldehyde reduction was found to be RuCl2(PPh3)3, while a 1:10 mixture of RhCl(PPh3)3 and triphenylphosphine was the best for ketones. Nitrobenzenes could not be reduced with formate under phase transfer conditions (85).

Aryl bromides underwent hydrogenolysis using PdCl2(PPh3)2/PPh3 and (C6H,13)4NHS04 (86, 87). This proved to be a useful technique for preparing monodeuterated aromatic compounds on substituting D2O for H2O (87). Hydrogenolysis of I-(chloromethyl)-naphthalene was achieved using a palladium catalyst in which a phosphine functionalised with a crown ether was bound to the palladium (88). A mixture of Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 and benzo-[18-crown—6] was far less effective than the functionalised palladium complex.

Miscellaneous Reductions

Aniline derivatives are prepared in excellent yields, 84-100 per cent, from the corresponding nitrobenzenes by reduction with carbon monoxide at 1 atmosphere pressure, at room temperature, using Ru3(CO)12/NaOH/ C6H6/MeO(CH2)2OH/BzEt3NCl (89). The method gives good selectivity. No hydrogenolysis occurs in the reduction of p- chloronitrobenzene to p -chloroariline (100 per cent yield), and no reduction of the aldehyde group occurs in the reduction of p- nitrobenzaldehyde to p -aminobenzaldehyde (100 per cent yield). Similar results are obtained with the mixed catalyst [Rh(COD)Cl]2/Co2(CO)8, where COD is 1,5-cyclooctadiene, (90). Unhindered nitrobenzenes are reduced successfully at room temperature and 1 atmosphere pressure with syngas (1:1 carbon monoxide:hydrogen) using RuCl2(PPh3)3/C6H5CH3/5M NaOH/ BzEt3NCl (91). Reduction is much less facile when either carbon monoxide or hydrogen is used alone. Olefin, halide, and carbonyl functional groups are not reduced under the same conditions.

The reduction of phenyl bromide in yields of up to 93 per cent was achieved with sodium hydride, under solid-liquid conditions, using a palladium phosphine catalyst in which the phosphine was functionalised with an aliphatic polyether (92). The optimum yield was critically dependent on the chain length of the polyether, and little reduction occurred without a phase transfer catalyst or even with a mixture of a phase transfer catalyst and a palladium catalyst.

Benzylic alcohols were dehydrogenated to ketones in fair to good yields using [Rh(CO)2Cl]2/8M NaOH/C6H6/BzEt3NCl (93). Secondary alcohols gave ketones, while the primary alcohol 2-naphthalenemethanol gave 2-naphthaldehyde.


The most useful application of phase transfer catalysis with platinum group metal complexes appears to be the formation of carbon-carbon bonds, particularly in carbonylations and vinylations. Indeed, the scope of vinylation reactions has recently been extended to include the allylation of alkyl iodides with allylsilanes using Pd(OAc)2 (94) and the allylation of acrylate esters with arylsulphonyl chlorides (95). The only industrial process employing a platinum group metal catalyst under phase transfer conditions is the hydroformylation of propylene to butanal by Ruhr Chemie using a rhodium compound with the ligand (3-H03SC6H4)3P. The separation of the rhodium complex from the products is simplified as a result of the water solubility of the rhodium complex.

While there are a few instances of phase transfer catalysed oxidations in which the use of platinum group metal complexes have proven advantageous, in general there are many facile methods of oxidation using platinum group metal catalysts which do not require phase transfer conditions.

Similarly, reductions with hydrogen and platinum group metals complexes under phase transfer catalysis conditions are not generally used, since there is a wide variety of supported platinum group metal catalysts which are readily accessible to perform such reductions conveniently (96).


  1. 1
    H. Schnell, Angew. Chem., 1956, 68, 633
  2. 2
    C. M. Starks, Isr. J. Chem., 1985, 26, 211
  3. 3
    C. M. Starks, in “Phase-Transfer Catalysis”, ed. C. M. Starks, ACS Symp. Series No. 326, 1985, 1
  4. 4
    J. Dockx, Synthesis, 1973, 441
  5. 5
    M. Makosza, Pure Appl. Chem., 1975, 43, 439
  6. 6
    A. Brandstrom, “Preparative Ion Pair Extraction”, Apotekarsocietet, Stockholm, 1976
  7. 7
    E. V. Dehmlow, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl., 1977, 16, 493
  8. 8
    W. P. Weber and G. W. Gokel, “Phase Transfer Catalysis in Organic Synthesis”, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1977
  9. 9
    A. Brandstrom, Adv. Phys. Org. Chem., 1977, 15, 267
  10. 10
    M. Makosza, Russ. Chem. Rev., 1977, 46, 1151
  11. 11
    C. M. Starks and C. Liotta, “Phase Transfer Catalysis”, Academic Press, New York, 1978
  12. 12
    J. M. Lehn, Acc. Chem. Res., 1978, 11, 49
  13. 13
    J. M. Mcintosh, J. Chem. Ed., 1978, 55, 235
  14. 14
    G. W. Gokel and W. P. Weber, J. Chem. Ed., 1978, 55, 350
  15. 15
    W. P. Weber and G. W. Gokel, J. Chem. Ed., 1978, 55, 429
  16. 16
    M. Makosza in “ Survey of Progress in Chemistry”, Vol IX, Academic Press, New York, 1979
  17. 17
    W. E. Keller, “Compendium of Phase-Transfer Reactions and Related Synthetic Methods”, Fluka, Switzerland, 1979
  18. 18
    L. Lindblom and M. Elander, Pharm. Technol., 1980, ( 10 ), 59
  19. 19
    B. Reuben and K. Sjoberg, Chemtech, 1981, 315
  20. 20
    P. Cocagne,, J. Elguero and R. Gallo, Heterocycles, 1983, 20, 1379
  21. 21
    E. V. Dehmlow and S. S. Dehmlow, “Phase Transfer Catalysis”, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, 1983
  22. 22
    E. D’Incan,, P. Viout and R. Gallo, Isr. J. Chem., 1985, 26, 277
  23. 23
    H. H. Freedman, Pure Appl. Chem., 1986, 58, 857
  24. 24
    L. Cassar, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1980, 333, 208
  25. 25
    H. Alper, Adv. Organomet. Chem., 1981, 19, 183
  26. 26
    H. Alper, Fundam. Res. Homogeneous Catal., 1984, 4, 79
  27. 27
    H. Des Abbaye, Isr. J. Chem., 1985, 26, 249
  28. 28
    H. Alper, Prep. Am. Chem. Soc., Div. Pet. Chem., 1985, 30, 364
  29. 29
    H. Alper, in “Phase-Transfer Catalysis”, ed. C. M. Starks, ACS Symp. Series No. 326, 1985, 8
  30. 30
    H. Alper,, K. Hashem and J. Heveling, Organometallics, 1982, 1, 775
  31. 31
    S. Zhang,, S. Xiao,, M. Ran and H. Dai, Fenzi Cuihua, 1987, 1, 115 ; CA 109:756531
  32. 32
    H. Arzoumanian,, G. Buono,, M’Barek Choukrad and J. F. Petrignani, Organometallics, 1988, 7, 59
  33. 33
    V. Galamb and H. Alper, J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun., 1983, 88
  34. 34
    L. Cassar,, M. Foa and A. Gardano, J. Organomet. Chem., 1976, 121, C55
  35. 35
    V. Galamb,, M. Gopal and H. Alper, Organometallics, 1983, 2, 801
  36. 36
    V. Galamb and H. Alper, Transition Met. Chem., 1983, 8, 271
  37. 37
    B. M. Choudary,, P. N. Reddy and B. Ashok, Appl. Catal., 1987, 32, 357
  38. 38
    I. Pri-Bar and H. Alper, J. Org. Chem., 1989, 54, 36
  39. 39
    J. E. Hallgren and G. M. Lucas, J. Organomet. Chem., 1981, 212, 135
  40. 40
    J. E. Hallgren, U.S. Patent 4, 361, 519, 1980
  41. 41
    R. T. Smith,, R. K. Unger,, L. J. Sanderson and M. C. Baird, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 1983, 415, 253
  42. 42
    H. Bahnnann,, B. Cornils,, W. Konkol and W. Lipps, German Offen. 3,412, 335, 1985
  43. 43
    M. J. H. Russell, Platinum Metals Rev., 1988, 32, ( 4 ), 179
  44. 44
    E. G. Kuntz, Chemtech, 1987, 17, 570
  45. 45
    R. F. Heck, Org. React., 1982, 27, 345 ; “Palladium Reagents in Organic Synthesis”, Academic Press, London, 1985
  46. 46
    T. Jeffery, J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., 1984, 1287
  47. 47
    T. Jeffery, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 2667
  48. 48
    T. Jeffery, Synthesis, 1987, 70
  49. 49
    R. Benhaddou,, S. Czernecki,, G. Ville and A. Zegar, Organometallics, 1988, 7, 2435
  50. 50
    R. Rossi,, A. Carpita,, M. G. Quirici and M. L. Gaudenzi, Tetrahedron, 1982, 38, 631
  51. 51
    H. A. Zahalka,, K. Januskiewicz and H. Alper, J. Mol. Catal, 1986, 35, 249
  52. 52
    K. Januskiewicz and H. Alper, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 5163
  53. 53
    E. S. Gore, Platinum Metals Rev., 1983, 27, ( 3 ), 111
  54. 54
    E. S. Gore, in “Chemistry of the Platinum Group Metals: Recent Developments”, ed. by F. R. Hartley, Elsevier, Amsterdam, to be published
  55. 55
    P. H. J. Carlsen,, T. Katsuki,, V. S. Martin and K. B. Sharpless, J. Org. Chem., 1981, 46, 3936
  56. 56
    K. Januskiewicz and H. Alper, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 5159
  57. 57
    A. Harada,, Y. Hu and S. Takahashi, Chem. Lett. Jpn., 1986, 2083
  58. 58
    H. Alper,, K. Januskiewicz and D. J. H. Smith, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 2263
  59. 59
    F. Matsuda and K. Kato, Japanese Appl. 61/68439, 1986
  60. 60
    S. G. Kukes and T. K. Shioyama, U.S. Patent 4,448, 892, 1984
  61. 61
    W. H. Clement and C. M. Selwitz, J. Org. Chem., 1964, 29, 241
  62. 62
    T. P. Murtha and T. K. Shioyama, U.S. Patent 4,434,082, 1984
  63. 63
    J. Tsuji, Org. Synth., 1984, 62, 9
  64. 64
    C. M. Starks and P. W. Washecheck, U.S. Patent 3,547,962, 1970
  65. 65
    T. A. Foglia,, P. A. Barr and A. J. Malloy, J. Am. OU Chem. Soc., 1977, 54, 858A
  66. 66
    G. Barak and Y. Sasson, J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., 1987, 1266
  67. 67
    J. C. Dobson,, W. K. Seek and T. J. Meyer, In-org. Chem., 1986, 25, 1514
  68. 68
    Y. Sasson,, G. D. Zappi and R. Neumann, J. Org. Chem., 1986, 51, 2880
  69. 69
    G. Barak and Y. Sasson, J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., 1988, 637
  70. 70
    E. S. Olson and B. W. Farnum, Prep. Pap. ACS., Div. Fuel Chem., 1981, 26, 60
  71. 71
    P. E. Morris, Jr. and D. E. Kiely, J. Org. Chem., 1987, 52, 1149
  72. 72
    Y. Yamamoto,, H. Suzuki, and Y. Moro-oka, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 2107
  73. 73
    S. Giddings and A. Mills, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 1103
  74. 74
    G. Barak and Y. Sasson, J. Org. Chem., 1988, 53, 3553 ; J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., 1987, 1266
  75. 75
    B. M. Choudary,, N. P. Reddy,, M. L. Kantam and Z. Jamil, Tetrahedron Lett., 1985, 26, 6257
  76. 76
    Y. Sasson,, H. Wiener and S. Bashir, J. Chem. Soc, Chem. Commun., 1987, 1574
  77. 77
    M. J. H. Russell and B. A. Murrer, European Appl. 61,337, 1982
  78. 78
    Y. Dror and J. Manassen, J. Mol. Catal., 1977, 2, 219
  79. 79
    K. R. Januszkiewicz and H. Alper, Organometallics, 1983, 2, 1055
  80. 80
    J. Blum,, I. Amer,, A. Zoran and Y. Sasson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1983, 24, 4139
  81. 81
    E. N. Marvell and T. Li, Synthesis, 1973, 457
  82. 82
    J. Azran,, O. Buchman,, I. Amer and J. Blum, J. Mol. Catal., 1986, 34, 229
  83. 83
    C. J. Longley,, T. J. Goodwin and G. Wilkinson, Polyhedron, 1986, 5, 1625
  84. 84
    R. Bar and Y. Sasson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1981, 22, 1709
  85. 85
    R. Bar,, Y. Sasson and J. Blum, J. Mol. Catal, 1984, 26, 327 ; R. Bar,, L. K. Bar,, Y. Sasson and J. Blum, J. Mol. Catal, 1985, 33, 161
  86. 86
    A. Zoran and Y. Sasson, J. Mol. Catal, 1984, 27, 349
  87. 87
    R. Bar,, Y. Sasson and J. Blum, J. Mol. Catal, 1982, 16, 175
  88. 88
    T. Okano,, M. Iwahara,, T. Suzuki,, H. Konishi and J. Kiji, Chem. Lett. Jpn., 1986, 1467
  89. 89
    H. Alper and S. Amaratunga, Tetrahedron Lett., 1980, 21, 2603
  90. 90
    K. E. Hashem,, J. F. Petrignani and H. Alper, J. Mol. Catal., 1984, 26, 285
  91. 91
    K. Janusckiewicz and H. Alper, J. Mol. Catal., 1983, 19, 139
  92. 92
    T. Okano,, M. Yamamoto,, T. Noguchi,, H. Konishi and J. Kiji, Chem. Lett. Jpn., 1982, 977
  93. 93
    H. Alper,, K. Hachem and S. Gambarotta, Can. J. Chem., 1980, 58, 1599
  94. 94
    N. M. Chistovalova,, I. S. Akhrem,, V. F. Sizoi,, V. V. Bardin and M. E. Vol ’pin, lzv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Khim., 1988, 1180
  95. 95
    M. Miura,, H. Hashimoto,, K. Itoh and M. Nomura, Tetrahedron Lett., 1989, 30, 975
  96. 96
    P. N. Rylander, “Catalytic Hydrogenation in Organic Syntheses”, Academic Press, Orlando, 1979

Find an article