Journal Archive

Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2017, 61, (4), 279
doi: 10.1595/205651317X696207

Radiolytic Conversion of Platinum, Rhodium, Osmium and Palladium Salts into Metal Coatings and Metal Nanoparticles

Using intense gamma ray irradiation of precious metal salts to synthesise nanoparticles

  • Takalani Cele*
  • UNESCO-UNISA Africa Chair in Nanosciences- Nanotechnology, College of Graduate Studies, University of South Africa, Muckleneuk Ridge, PO Box 392, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa; and iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, PO Box 722, Somerset West, 7129, South Africa
  • *Email:
  • Philip Beukes
  • iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, PO Box 722, Somerset West, 7129, South Africa
  • Thomas Beuvier
  • L’Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (L’UNAM), Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans (IMMM UMR 6283 CNRS), Avenue Oliver Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans, Cedex 9, France
  • Elvia Chavez
  • L’Université Nantes Angers Le Mans (L’UNAM), Institut des Molécules et Matériaux du Mans (IMMM UMR 6283 CNRS), Avenue Oliver Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans, Cedex 9, France
  • Malik Maaza
  • UNESCO-UNISA Africa Chair in Nanosciences- Nanotechnology, College of Graduate Studies, University of South Africa, Muckleneuk Ridge, PO Box 392, Pretoria, 0001, South Africa; and iThemba LABS-National Research Foundation, PO Box 722, Somerset West, 7129, South Africa
  • Alain Gibaud**
  • L’UNAM, IMMM UMR 6283 CNRS, Avenue Oliver Messiaen, 72085 Le Mans, Cedex 9, France
  • **Email:

Article Synopsis

We herein report on the effect of gamma ray radiation on platinum, osmium, rhodium and palladium salt solutions for synthesis of nanoparticles. Pt, Os, Rh and Pd salt solutions were exposed to intense gamma ray irradiation with doses varying from 70 to 120 kGy. The metal ion salt solutions were easily converted into metal nanoparticles using this radiolysis method. The radiolytic conversion effect produced metal nanoparticles suspended in solution. For Pt, Pd and Rh a metal coating on the edges of the polypropylene tube used as a container was unexpectedly observed but not for the Os solution. X-Ray diffraction (XRD) and high resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) analyses confirmed that both the coating and the metal nanoparticles correspond to the pure metal coming from the reduction of the initial salt. Quantitative analysis of the XRD patterns shows information about the size and stress of the converted metals. The production of a metal coating on polypropylene plastic tubes by gamma ray irradiation presents an interesting alternative to conventional techniques of metal deposition especially for coating the inner part of a tube.

1. Introduction

Plastic materials are omnipresent in our daily life and are used in many industrial areas such as packaging, microelectronics, medical devices, automobile parts or simply as plastic bags. In many high technology applications, plastics cannot be used on their own as they do not meet the necessary requirements for expected applications. Metallisation is a way to modify the surface of plastics for aesthetic, mechanical, biocidal and electrical purposes (1). The packaging and microelectronics industries are major users of metal-coated plastics. Metallisation can increase their gloss and reflectivity but also provide barriers for ultraviolet (UV) light degradation and enhance plastics’ physical properties. Properties, such as abrasion resistance and electric conductivity, which are not innate characteristics of plastic, can be produced through metallisation. To metalise a piece of plastic common methods such as vacuum metallisation, arc and flame spraying or plating are utilised (25).

In this paper, we present an alternative method based on the use of intense gamma ray irradiation of metal salt aqueous solutions using a radiolysis method. This method was initiated in the 1980s by the pioneering work of Belloni and Delcourt’s group using the reducing radicals produced in water radiolysis and the method was applied to some noble metals (69). Deposits of metal clusters were also obtained on smooth transparent tin(IV) oxide (SnO2) and indium tin oxide (ITO) electrodes (10).

This study is focused on the radiolysis of platinum group metals (pgms) that are far less studied given their high price compared to gold or silver. Four metals were chosen in this group: Pt, Os, Rh and Pd (1113). The radiolytic conversion of metal salt solutions into metal nanoparticles is a very well-known process of great interest as it does not necessitate the use of polluting solvents (14). It is indeed a versatile and powerful way to synthesise metal nanoparticles of controlled size and shape with the possibility to synthesise bimetallic nanoparticles and composite materials (1520). The main advantage of radiolysis is that it operates in very simple physico-chemical conditions (room temperature, absence of contaminants, diluted aqueous solutions). During radiolysis the reducing agents are either radicals or solvated electrons that are generated by solvent excitation. The choice of the absorbed dose is critical in order to control the cluster size and crystal structure by precise modification of nucleation and growth steps particularly for multi-metal clusters (2123). The primary effects of the interaction of high-energy gamma photons with a solution of metal ions are the excitation and ionisation of the solvent. The different reactions that are observed are well explained (24, 25). In particular, water can produce upon irradiation a series of reducing and oxidising agents as shown in Equation (i):


To produce metal nanoparticles from metal salt solutions, the well-known reducing agents are eaq and H•. Unfortunately, the production of hydroxyl radicals OH• hampers the efficiency unless some specific hydroxyl scavenger such as isopropanol is used. Note that as pointed out in the early research studies (25, 26), the free radical (CH3)2C•OH produced by scavenging has the peculiar property of being a strong reducing agent and also contributes to the reduction of metal ions (27).

Radiolysis has been widely used to produce gold and silver nanoparticles. A number of studies have been conducted to investigate these metal nanoparticles using UV-visible spectroscopy with the aim of analysing their plasmonic absorption band (2830). In other studies, gamma ray irradiation was used to trap metal nanoparticles inside polymers or porous frameworks, for instance mesoporous silica (3133). There has also been a study of the catalytic properties of Pt nanoparticles on a glass support prepared by radiolysis (34).

However, this technique has not been reported to fabricate thick coated films on the surface of vessels in which solutions are gamma irradiated and almost nothing has been published on the reduction of Os and Rh salts by this technique (3537). In addition, the literature on the use of highly concentrated solutions is also quite sparse very likely because of the very expensive cost of the precursors.

In this paper, we report on the reduction of metal salts solutions of precious metals (Pt, Rh, Os and Pd) which were stored inside polypropylene sealed tubes during gamma irradiation. It was observed that above a threshold of 5.0 × 10–3 M, Pt and Rh solutions yielded a shiny metal deposit on the surface of polypropylene tubes below the air-solution surface. For Os solutions, the entire propylene tube was covered with a black deposit and the intensity of the deposit increased with the concentration of the solution. This deposit is reminiscent of osmium oxide which is black and volatile (38). Pd solutions also yielded some deposit on the surface of the tubes but not as shiny as those for Rh and Pt. We present in the following the details of this experiment with some characterisation of the materials formed after gamma irradiation.

2. Materials and Methods

The salts used in this study were potassium tetrachloroplatinate (K2PtCl4), osmium tetroxide (OsO4) and palladium(II) chloride (PdCl2) purchased from BDH Laboratory Chemical Division, UK, and rhodium trichloride hydrate (RhCl3.x H2O) obtained from Chemica in South Africa. Isopropyl alcohol (IPA) 95% that was used in the experiment was obtained from BDH Laboratory Chemical Division, UK, and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was obtained from Merck (Pty) Ltd South Africa.

Ionic solutions of metal salts (Pt, Rh, Os and Pd) were prepared at different concentrations (1.0 × 10–3 M, 2.5 × 10–3 M, 5.0 × 10–3 M, 7.5 × 10–3 M and 1.0 × 10–2 M).

Isopropanol was added at a concentration of 2.0 × 10–1 M in each solution to prevent OH• radicals and counterbalance the effect of solvated electrons in radiolysis. Isopropanol is a very good scavenger of such radicals. In some experiments a surfactant (SDS) was added at a weight fraction of 2%. Solutions were then poured into polypropylene tubes and sealed for irradiation with gamma rays. The tubes were 13 mm inner diameter and 100 mm long. In all experiments the amount of the prepared solutions inside each tube was fixed at 5 ml. In order to avoid the presence of dissolved dioxygen inside the solutions, each tube was further flushed with nitrogen gas for 1 min prior to the gamma ray irradiation. Irradiation was conducted using a 60Co source of activity 600 Gy min–1. Solutions were irradiated with 70, 90 and 120 kGy doses for a duration of about 2 to 3.3 h.

XRD experiments were performed on a PANalytical θ/θ Bragg-Brentano Empyrean diffractometer (CuKα1+2 radiations) equipped with a Pixe detector. XRD patterns were collected in reflection geometry either on powder spread out on a glass substrate or directly on the coated surface of the polypropylene. The X-ray tube was working at 40 kV and 30 mA. Raman spectra were recorded at room temperature in the backscattering configuration on a T64000 Jobin-Yvon (Horiba) spectrometer under a microscope with a 50× objective focusing the 514 nm line from an argon-krypton (Ar-Kr) ion laser (Coherent, Innova). HRTEM experiments were carried out on a Fei Tecnai G220 operated at 200 kV. HRTEM samples were prepared by placing a drop of irradiated solution on a copper and nickel grid, followed by drying under light for 5 min at room temperature.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1 Visual Observations

Figure 1(a) shows the tubes with different concentrations of Rh solutions after irradiation at a dose of 90 kGy. One can easily observe the remarkable appearance of a shiny metal deposit on the surface of the polypropylene tubes as soon as the concentration of Rh solution is above 5.0 × 10–3 M (tube (iii)). It is thus obvious that with the increase in concentration, there is an increase of metal deposits. The deposit is very likely the result of the conversion of Rh metal ions into metallic Rh. A threshold concentration of about c = 5.0 × 10–3 M is the limit above which the deposit seems to be continuous and complete to the naked eye. The plastic tubes did not change their colour under the effect of gamma irradiation unlike glass tubes which darkened when irradiated. At the bottom of the tubes one can see that the solutions are slightly dark evidencing the presence of small particles. There was also no evidence of any modification of the tubes when irradiated although they were likely to be sensitive to gamma irradiation.

Fig. 1.

Effect of irradiation on solutions of: (a) Rh and (b) Pt ions with concentrations (i) 1.0 × 10–3 M, (ii) 2.5 × 10–3 M, (iii) 5.0 × 10–3 M, (iv) 7.5 × 10–3 M and (v) 1.0 × 10–2 M irradiated at 90 kGy. Tubes are photographed vertically, head down

The particles appeared not to be strongly aggregated. A similar effect was observed in the case of Pt solutions, where above 5.0 × 10–3 M, the tubes were covered with a shiny metal deposit as shown in Figure 1(b), tube (iii). In addition, the interior of the tubes contained a small amount highly agglomerated black particles (Pt black). At the two lowest concentrations (1 × 10–3 M and 2.5 × 10–3 M), the solutions were observed to contain suspended particles which were certainly quite small in size and could be considered as a colloidal solution.

In order to estimate the maximum thickness of the coating, a rough calculation was made of the surface of the coating on the tube walls. In the case of the 10–2 M Pt solution, which was the most concentrated, it can be assumed that the thickness of the coating would be more intense. The maximum thickness of the coating (Pt film) was estimated to be 3.5 μm assuming that all the Pt was converted into the shiny deposit (which is not exactly the case as a few Pt particles were still in the solution).

It is worth noting that the solutions of Os and Pd behave very differently from those of Pt and Rh. The solutions of Os were prepared in the same volume as those of Pt and Rh. They nevertheless produced a very significant effect during irradiation. Instead of yielding a metal film located below the air-liquid interface as is the case for Pt and Rh, Os solutions with a concentration above 5.0 × 10–3 M tubes were coated from top to bottom with a deep black deposit as shown in Figure 2(a), tube (iii). This coating is very likely to be osmium(IV) oxide (OsO2) which is known to be a dark compound and which would be a reduced form of the initial precursor since its valence is downgraded from 6 to 4 (3941).

Fig. 2.

Effect of irradiation on: (a) Os and (b) Pd solutions of concentrations (i) 1.0 × 10–3 M, (ii) 2.5 × 10–3 M, (iii) 5.0 × 10–3 M, (iv) 7.5 × 10–3 M and (v) 1.0 × 10–2 M irradiated at 90 kGy

In the case of Pd solutions, the behaviour is again different from the other pgms, as shown in Figure 2(b). It can be seen that a slight deposit formed on the part of the tube which contained the solution. However, the solution was observed to be colloidal at c = 2.5 × 10–3 M and very dark in colour. Above this concentration there was a yellow transparent solution forming which contained black particles. At c = 1.0 × 10–2 M the solution was transparent and contained aggregated black particles.

In all the above experiments, it was found that the deposit on the tube walls was extremely stable either with or without the solution kept inside the tube. Deposits were fully preserved a year after the irradiation.

The same experiments were also conducted on 5.0 × 10–3 M solutions of these metal salts, in which the SDS was added as a surfactant in order to reduce the aggregation of metal particles. As seen in Figure 3, the addition of SDS to the solution was observed to have a prominent effect. In all cases colloidal solutions were obtained with a weak deposit on the walls of the propylene tube in the case of Rh and Os. It is thus straightforward to state from a visual point of view that the effect of adding the surfactant was quite drastic. For instance Pd solutions without the surfactant yielded a yellowish colour at this concentration, in marked contrast with the dark colouration in presence of the surfactant. Similar effects were observed for Rh and Pt, while for Os it appeared that the blackening of the polypropylene tube was reduced.

Fig. 3.

Effect of irradiation on solutions (a) Pt, (b) Rh, (c) Os and (d) Pd with concentrations of 5.0 × 10—3 M with SDS added at 2% w/w and irradiated at 90 kGy

Note that in agreement with our observations, in the absence of any surfactant, the precursor metal ions were mostly adsorbed on the polyethylene walls, as is known for porous supports. The low dose rate and the long irradiation time used here favour the diffusion of ions towards the walls. Moreover, it is likely that the irradiation of the support induces electrons that contribute to the reduction of adsorbed ions in contact. Then supplementary ions adsorb on the initial reduced metal layer and are also reduced in situ. In contrast, when the solution contains SDS, the ion binding with the surfactant is stronger than the adsorption on the polyethylene and mostly inhibits the deposit.

3.2 X-Ray Diffraction and High Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy Analysis

The polypropylene tubes and their contents were further analysed using Raman and XRD to identify the nature of the phases formed upon irradiation. Raman scattering using a confocal microscope was performed in situ (in the solution) and ex situ (on dried particles). No special effect of the gamma irradiation was seen on the polypropylene tube itself.

As expected from the cubic structure of these noble metals, no clear signal was measurable from either the inner part of the tube or the black particles located inside the solution in the Raman analysis.

XRD patterns of the coatings and metal nanoparticles after irradiation with gamma rays clearly revealed their metallic nature, except for Os, as shown in Figure 4. One can clearly see in Figure 4 that the diffraction patterns are fully consistent with the Fm3m structures of bulk pgm except for the case of Os. The diffraction peaks are extremely broad in the case of Pt evidencing the fact that the size of the particles that coherently diffract is quite small. The broadening is less for Rh and even less for Pd, which might be due to the fact that in the order Pd < Rh < Pt, it is easier to reduce the ions because of four chloride ligands on [PtCl4]2− that are able to stabilise small size particles (21). In the case of Os, the XRD pattern did not reveal any features showing that the deposit was mainly amorphous. A fit to the data was carried out with the Materials Analysis Using Diffraction (MAUD) program developed by Lutterrotti (42). Very good agreement can be seen between the calculated and the observed patterns. The advantage of using this program is that it allows the size of the crystallites that scatter coherently to be determined, together with the strain of the lattice. The parameters obtained reveal that the lattice parameter for Pt is very close to that of the bulk. The size of the particles corresponding in this case to the size of the domains which coherently scatter the beam is about 8.8 nm and the lattice is clearly strained.

Fig. 4.

XRD patterns of Pt, Rh, Pd and Os particles

The Pt deposit on the tube walls was also analysed by XRD. The tube was cut along its principal axis and the inner part of the tube was mounted on the stage of the XRD. It was observed that this deposit was shiny and quite fragile when subjected to scratches with tweezers. The shiny aspect of the deposit was a clear signature of its metallic nature. However when a scan in conventional θ-θ geometry was carried out, no measurable signal of the Pt deposit was obtained. The main reason was attributed to the very small thickness of this deposit that was precluding the measurement of a correct signal over noise ratio. For this reason a 2θ scan (detector scan) was performed at a fixed grazing incident angle of about 0.9° using a parallel beam coming from a W-C mirror (Empyrean diffractometer PANalytical). It was thus possible to identify all the reflections of the Fm3m structure, clearly evidencing that the thickness of the deposit was extremely small and that the deposit was pure Pt (see Figure 5). Similar conclusions could be drawn for Rh and Pd.

Fig. 5.

Comparison between the X-ray powder diffraction patterns collected on Pt powder and on the coating of the polypropylene tube

Note that in the case of the coating, experiments were carried out at grazing incidence and that the scattering by the tube itself was subtracted. One can see clearly the perfect concordance between the two patterns.

Table I gathers some typical information concerning the metals studied hereafter together with the values measured for some of the parameters (i.e. lattice parameters, size and strain) after refining the measurements using the MAUD Software (42).

Table I

Space Groups of Platinum, Palladium, Rhodium and Osmium Together with Bulk Lattice Parameters and the Measured Values of the Lattice Parameters in this Study, the Size of the Particles in Powder and the Strain

Metal Space group Bulk lattice parameter, a, nm Measured lattice parameter, a*, nm Size of particles, nm Measured strain
Pt Fm3m 0.39242 0.39222 (0.0001) 8.8 (0.2) 0.0057 (0.0002)
Rh Fm3m 0.38034 0.38066 (0.0005) 16.9 (0.6) 0.0038 (0.004)
Pd Fm3m 0.3807 0.38947 (0.0001) 41.7 (1.1) 0.0015 (0.0001)
Os P63/mmc a = 0.27311 c = 0.43173 N.A. N.A. N.A.

As shown in Figures 68, HRTEM analysis of the metal nanoparticles present in the solution also complement the XRD results. It can clearly be observed in these images that particles are agglomerated.

Fig. 6.

(a) HRTEM image of Pt particles synthesised by gamma irradiation at a dose of 120 kGy; (b) selected area electron diffraction (SAED) of Pt nanoparticles

Fig. 7.

(a) HRTEM image of Rh particles synthesised by gamma irradiation at a dose of 120 kGy; (b) SAED of Rh nanoparticles

Fig. 8.

(a) HRTEM image of Pd particles synthesised by gamma irradiation at a dose of 120 kGy; (b) SAED of Pd nanoparticles

The rings observed in the electron diffraction scattering patterns are in good agreement with the calculated d spacing values from Pt, Pd and Rh diffraction data from the literature. The set of hkl indices corresponding to these rings are shown in Figures 6(b), 7(b) and 8(b).

From this present study it can be confirmed that gamma ray irradiation of salt solutions containing Pt and Rh ions at dose rates above 70 kGy can be used to convert the pgm salts into metal nanoparticles in the bulk and produce a shiny metal coating on polypropylene tubes. The Pd salt solution did not yield such a shiny coating whereas the Os solution produced an intense black coating, the structure of which was found to be amorphous.

4. Conclusion

The noble metal salt solutions of Pt, Os, Rh and Pd were successfully reduced into metal nanoparticles using gamma ray irradiation at doses ranging from 70 to 120 kGy and even into a metal coating of the propylene tubes, except for Pd solutions. The structure of the metal nanoparticles and the coating was ascertained by a quantitative analysis of the XRD patterns. It is shown that these patterns are fully consistent with the Fm3m structure of these noble metals except for Os for which it was impossible to define any crystalline structure. This study revealed that gamma irradiation can be used to produce beautiful shiny metal coatings with Pt and Rh on the inner surface of plastic tubes provided that the concentration of the initial solution is high enough (in this case >5 × 10–3 M). Such an effect was unexpected and is of clear interest as an alternative to other deposition techniques such as metal evaporation or sputtering. The coating was found to be extremely stable in solution since no modification was observed even one year after irradiation. However when the tubes were cut, the coating could be easily scratched with tweezers. This was showed clearly that although the coating was stable as a function of time, the adhesion of the metal particles to the tube was not extremely good. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) studies of the coating are planned in the future to evidence the quality of the adhesion.


  1. 1.
    “Processing and Finishing of Polymeric Materials”, in 2 volumes, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New Jersey, USA, 2011, 1488 pp
  2. 2.
    T. Volova, “Polyhydroxyalkanoates – Plastic Materials of the 21st Century: Production, Properties and Applications”, Nova Science Publishers Inc, New York, USA, 2004, 282 pp
  3. 3.
    R. Klein, “Laser Welding of Plastics: Materials, Processes and Industrial Applications”, Wiley-VCH Verlag & Co KGaA, Weinheim, Germany, 2012, 260 pp LINK
  4. 4.
    “Handbook of Polyethylene Pipe”, 2nd Edn., Plastics Pipe Institute, Texas, USA, 2009, 620 pp LINK
  5. 5.
    R. J. Crawford, ‘General Properties of Plastics’, in “Plastics Engineering”, 3rd Edn., Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1998, 522 pp LINK
  6. 6.
    M.-O. Delcourt, J. Belloni, J.-L. Marignier, C. Mory and C. Colliex, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 1984, 23, (4), 485 LINK
  7. 7.
    J. L. Marignier, J. Belloni, M. O. Delcourt and J. P. Chevalier, Nature, 1985, 317, (6035), 344 LINK
  8. 8.
    J. Belloni, (née Cofler), J.-L. Marignier, M.-O. Delcourt (née Euverte) and M. Minana (née Lourseau), National Center for Scientific Research, ‘Non-noble Metal Micro-aggregates, Process for their Manufacture and their Use in the Catalysis of the Photoreduction of Water’, French Patent 8,409,196; 1985
  9. 9.
    A. J. Swallow, “Radiation Chemistry: An Introduction”, Longman Group Ltd, London, UK, 1973, 275 pp
  10. 10.
    J. Bruneaux, H. Cachet, M. Froment, J. Amblard, J. Belloni and M. Mostafavi, Electrochim. Acta, 1987, 32, (10), 1533 LINK
  11. 11.
    ‘Platinum-Group Metals’, in “Mineral Commodities Summaries 2006”, US Geological Survey (USGS), Reston, Virginia, USA, 2006, p. 126 LINK
  12. 12.
    L. B. Hunt and F. M. Lever, Platinum Metals Rev., 1969, 13, (4), 126 LINK
  13. 13.
    T. J. Colacot, Platinum Metals Rev., 2002, 46, (2), 82 LINK
  14. 14.
    K. Roy and S. Lahiri, Anal. Chem., 2008, 80, (19), 7504 LINK
  15. 15.
    J. Amblard, O. Platzer, J. Ridard and J. Belloni, J. Phys. Chem., 1992, 96, (5), 2341 LINK
  16. 16.
    M. Treguer, C. de Cointet, H. Remita, J. Khatouri, M. Mostafavi, J. Amblard, J. Belloni and R. de Keyzer, J. Phys. Chem. B, 1998, 102, (22), 4310 LINK
  17. 17.
    C. M. Doudna, M. F. Bertino, F. D. Blum, A. T. Tokuhiro, D. Lahiri-Dey, S. Chattopadhyay and J. Terry, J. Phys. Chem. B., 2003, 107, (13), 2966 LINK
  18. 18.
    M. Mirdamadi-Esfahani, M. Mostafavi, B. Keita, L. Nadjo, P. Kooyman and H. Remita, Gold Bull., 2010, 43, (1), 49 LINK
  19. 19.
    Y. Yang, P. Cheng and S. Huang, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 688, (Part A), 1172 LINK
  20. 20.
    T.-E. Fan, T.-D. Liu, J.-W. Zheng, G.-F. Shao and Y.-H. Wen, J. Alloys Compd., 2016, 685, 1008 LINK
  21. 21.
    J. Belloni, M. Mostafavi, H. Remita, J.-L. Marignier and M.-O. Delcourt, New J. Chem., 1998, 22, (11), 1239 LINK
  22. 22.
    B. Soroushian, I. Lampre, J. Belloni and M. Mostafavi, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2005, 72, (2–3), 111 LINK
  23. 23.
    J. Belloni, Catal. Today, 2006, 113, (3–4), 141 LINK
  24. 24.
    K. Roy and S. Lahiri, Green Chem., 2006, 8, (12), 1063 LINK
  25. 25.
    M. K. Temgire, J. Bellare and S. S. Joshi, Adv. Phys. Chem., 2011, 249097 LINK
  26. 26.
    A. Henglein, Chem. Rev., 1989, 89, (8), 1861 LINK
  27. 27.
    S. Choofong, P. Suwanmala and W. Pasanphan, ‘Water-Soluble Chitosan-Gold Composite Nanoparticles: Preparation by Radiolysis Method’, The 18th International Conference on Composite Materials, Jeju, Korea, 21st–26th August, 2011, 6 pp LINK
  28. 28.
    Y. N. Rao, D. Banerjee, A. Datta, S. K. Das, R. Guin and A. Saha, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2010, 79, (12), 1240 LINK
  29. 29.
    J. Biswal, S. P. Ramnani, R. Tewari, G. K. Dey and S. Sabharwal, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2010, 79, (4), 441 LINK
  30. 30.
    E. Gachard, H. Remita, J. Khatouri, B. Keita, L. Nadjo and J. Belloni, New J. Chem., 1998, 22, (11), 1257 LINK
  31. 31.
    A. Krklješ, “Radiolytic Synthesis of Nanocomposites Based on Noble Metal Nanoparticles and Natural Polymer, and their Application as Biomaterial”, Report No. IAEA–RC–1207.1, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 2011, 12 pp LINK
  32. 32.
    Q. Chen, J. Shi, R. Zhao and X. Shen, “Radiolytic Syntheses of Nanoparticles and Inorganic-Polymer Hybrid Microgels”, Report No. IAEA–RC–1124.2, International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Vienna, Austria, 2010, 10 pp LINK
  33. 33.
    V. Hornebecq, M. Antonietti, T. Cardinal and M. Treguer-Delapierre, Chem. Mater., 2003, 15, (10), 1993 LINK
  34. 34.
    A. D. Belapurkar, S. Kapoor, S. K. Kulshreshtha and J. P. Mittal, Mater. Res. Bull., 2001, 36, (1–2), 145 LINK
  35. 35.
    J. V. Rojas and C. H. Castano, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem., 2014, 302, (1), 555 LINK
  36. 36.
    X. Zhang, Y. Ye, H. Wang and S. Yao, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2010, 79, (10), 1058 LINK
  37. 37.
    J. V. Rojas and C. H. Castano, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 2012, 81, (1), 16 LINK
  38. 38.
    W. P. Griffith, Q. Rev. Chem. Soc., 1965, 19, (3), 254 LINK
  39. 39.
    J. W. Arblaster, Platinum Metals Rev., 1989, 33, (1), 14 LINK
  40. 40.
    J. W. Arblaster, Platinum Metals Rev., 1995, 39, (4), 164 LINK
  41. 41.
    I. C. Smith, B. L. Carson and T. L. Ferguson, Environ. Health Perspect., 1974, 8, 201 LINK
  42. 42.
    L. Lutterotti, S. Matthies and H. R. Wenk, ‘MAUD: A Friendly Java Program for Material Analysis Using Diffraction’, Newsletter, No. 21, International Union of Crystallography, Commission on Powder Diffraction, Stuttgart, Germany, 1999, p. 14 


The authors are particularly grateful to the iThemba LABS, National Research Foundation (NRF), French embassy in Pretoria for their support and to the Protea programme for funding.

The Authors

Takalani Cele has an MSc in Physical Science from University of the Western Cape. She is currently doing her PhD in nanotechnology at the University of South Africa. Her research interest is pgm nanoparticles by radiolysis, jointly supported by iThemba Laboratory for Accelerator Based Science, South Africa, and Université du Maine, Le Mans, France. She is also working on other projects in the South African Department of Trade and Industry’s Innovation and Technology unit.

Philip Beukes obtained an M(med)Sc in Nuclear Medicine at the Stellenbosch University, South Africa. He is currently head of the Radiation Safety Division at iThemba Laboratory for Accelerator Based Science. His research interest lies in radiation biodosimetry with a focus on quality factors for high energy neutron sources.

Thomas Beuvier completed his PhD in Material Science in 2009 at Université de Nantes, France, and at the Institut des Matériaux de Nantes (IMN), France. His post-doctoral research is focused on polymer thin films, inorganic materials and biomimetic/biogenic mineralisation using synchrotron X-rays.

Elvia Anabela Chavez Panduro received her PhD in Physics from Université du Maine, Le Mans, Institut des Molécules et des Matériaux du Mans (IMMM), France, in collaboration with the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), France. Currently she is working at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Norway, in collaboration with SINTEF Petroleum, Norway, on the CO2PLUG project which is financed by the Norwegian Research Council. Some of her research topics in this project are on the nano and micro scale study of cements (using X-ray imaging techniques) and on the problems of cement integrity when exposed to CO2-brine at high pressure and temperature.

Malik Maaza is a Professor, a Senior Scientist and staff member of the National Research Foundation of South Africa. He holds a PhD in neutron quantum optics from Université Pierre et Marie Curie, France, and an MSc in Photonics and lasers from Université Pierre et Marie Curie and Université Paris-Sud, France. He is the current holder of the UNESCO Africa Chair in Nanosciences and Nanotechnology. He pioneered world-class nanoscience research within the continent and at the international level. He has scientific expertise in the fields of surface and interface two-dimensional (2D)-phenomena, solar energy, neutron quantum optics specifically and neutron and X-ray scattering in general. He has authored and coauthored about 350 international peer reviewed ISI-CSI publications in reputable journals. He is the sole African author who has been invited to publish in Physics Report (2016 Journal Impact Factor 17.425, Clarivate Analytics 2017) and has recently coauthored a publication in Nature’s Scientific Reports (Nature group series). He is one of the rare African scientists serving on several editorial committees of ISI-CSI international journals such as the Journal of Materials Chemistry A and the International Journal of Nanotechnology.

Alain Gibaud is a Professor at Université du Maine, France. He received his PhD in Physics and an MSc in Acoustics at Université du Maine Le Mans. His research interest is in the multidisciplinary fields of nanoscience and X-ray physics.

Related articles

Biofilm Formation of Escherichia coli on Hydrophobic Steel Surface Provided by Laser-Texturing

Investigation of the Usage Characteristics of Environmentally Friendly Water-Repellent Chemicals on Cotton Fabrics

Find an article