Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 64, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 64, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The circular economy (CE) is an important approach and current trend in environmental sustainability. The implementation of the CE depends on the adoption of sustainable practices from the planning stages of new product development (NPD). Although the literature recognises the need to apply CE practices into NPD, few studies have tried to provide support for the issues based on real case studies. This article aims to identify and analyse practices, barriers and drivers to the development of circular products. To achieve this objective, a multiple case study was carried out in three medium and large Brazilian companies that have environmental concerns and, at the same time, are continuously involved in NPD activities. The results show that the companies’ circular product designs already foresee waste and recycled components as raw materials. In addition, it was found that infrastructural aspects and low awareness of customers regarding sustainability are challenges to overcome. Finally, for the adoption of CE practices, regulatory legislation stood out as a significant driver. This article contributes to theory and practice by providing empirical evidence of how companies have planned to build circular products by incorporating circular practices into the NPD process.

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15706349546439
2020-01-01
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/64/1/Jugend_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15706349546439&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. McAloone T. C., Pigosso D. C. A., Seliger G., and Bonvoisin J. ‘From Ecodesign to Sustainable Product/Service-Systems: A Journey Through Research Contributions over Recent Decades’, in “Sustainable Manufacturing. Sustainable Production, Life Cycle Engineering and Management”, eds. Stark R., Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2017, pp. 99–111 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-48514-0_7 [Google Scholar]
  2. Pinheiro M. A. P., Seles B. M. R. P., De Camargo Fiorini P., Jugend D., Lopes de Sousa Jabbour A. B., da Silva H. M. R., and Latan H. Manag. Decis., 2019, 57, (4), 840 LINK https://doi.org/10.1108/md-07-2018-0782 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bailey A. A., Mishra A., and Tiamiyu M. F. J. Consum. Mark., 2016, 33, (7), 562 LINK https://doi.org/10.1108/jcm-12-2015-1632 [Google Scholar]
  4. “Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development”, A/42/427 82e Environment, World Commission on Environment and Development, United Nations, New York, USA, 4th August, 1987, 374 pp LINK https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811 [Google Scholar]
  5. “Growth Within – A Circular Economy Vision for a Competitive Europe”, Ellen MacArthur Foundation, Cowes, Isle of Wight, 25th June, 2015, 98 pp LINK https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications/growth-within-a-circular-economy-vision-for-a-competitive-europe [Google Scholar]
  6. Lieder M., and Rashid A. J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 115, 36 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.042 [Google Scholar]
  7. Jaca C., Prieto-Sandoval V., Psomas E. L., and Ormazabal M. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 181, 201 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.182 [Google Scholar]
  8. Kasulaitis B. V., Babbitt C. W., and Krock A. K. J. Ind. Ecol., 2019, 23, (1), 119 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12756 [Google Scholar]
  9. Sousa-Zomer T. T., and Cauchick Miguel P. A. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 171, S119 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.063 [Google Scholar]
  10. Tukker A. Bus. Strateg. Environ., 2004, 13, (4), 246 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.414 [Google Scholar]
  11. Singh J., and Ordoñez I. J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 134, (Part A), 342 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.020 [Google Scholar]
  12. Prieto-Sandoval V., Ormazabal M., Jaca C., and Viles E. Bus. Strateg. Environ., 2018, 27, (8), 1525 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2210 [Google Scholar]
  13. Subramanian N., Gunasekaran A., Wu L., and Shen T. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2019, 57, (8), 1525 LINK https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00207543.2018.1530467 [Google Scholar]
  14. Tiwari M. K., Chang P.-C., and Choudhary A. Int. J. Prod. Econ., 2015, 164, 193 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.02.008 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bressanelli G., Adrodegari F., Perona M., and Saccani N. Sustainability, 2018, 10, (3), 639 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030639 [Google Scholar]
  16. Lopes de Sousa Jabbour A. B., Jabbour C. J. C., Godinho Filho M., and Roubaud D. Ann. Oper. Res., 2018, 270, (1–2), 273 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2772-8 [Google Scholar]
  17. Bocken N. M. P., de Pauw I., Bakker C., and van der Grinten B. J. Ind. Prod. Eng., 2016, 33, (5), 308 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124 [Google Scholar]
  18. Kirchherr J., Reike D., and Hekkert M. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2017, 127, 221 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.09.005 [Google Scholar]
  19. Kjaer L. L., Pigosso D. C. A., Niero M., Bech N. M., and McAloone T. C. J. Ind. Ecol., 2019, 23, (1), 22 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12747 [Google Scholar]
  20. de Jesus A., and Mendonça S. Ecol. Econ., 2018, 145, 75 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  21. Govindan K., and Hasanagic M. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2018, 56, (1–2), 278 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2017.1402141 [Google Scholar]
  22. Shahbazi S., Wiktorsson M., Kurdve M., Jönsson C., and Bjelkemyr M. J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 127, 438 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.03.143 [Google Scholar]
  23. Ritzén S., and Sandström G. Ö. Procedia CIRP, 2017, 64, 7 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.005 [Google Scholar]
  24. Bressanelli G., Perona M., and Saccani N. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2019, 57, (23), 7395 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1542176 [Google Scholar]
  25. den Hollander M. C., Bakker C. A., and Hultink E. J. J. Ind. Ecol., 2017, 21, (3), 517 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12610 [Google Scholar]
  26. Geng Y., and Doberstein B. Int. J. Sustain. Dev. World Ecol., 2008, 15, (3), 231 LINK https://doi.org/10.3843/susdev.15.3:6 [Google Scholar]
  27. Pinheiro M., and Jugend D. ‘Minding the Gap: The Road to Circular Business Models’, Research Perspectives in the Era of Transformations, 18th–21st June 2019, Academy for Design Innovation Management, London, UK, 13 pp [Google Scholar]
  28. Ghisellini P., Cialani C., and Ulgiati S. J. Clean. Prod., 2016, 114, 11 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 [Google Scholar]
  29. Vanegas P., Peeters J. R., Cattrysse D., Tecchio P., Ardente F., Mathieux F., Dewulf W., and Duflou J. R. Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2018, 135, 323 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2017.06.022 [Google Scholar]
  30. Olsen M. C., Slotegraaf R. J., and Chandukala S. R. J. Mark., 2014, 78, (5), 119 LINK https://doi.org/10.1509/jm.13.0387 [Google Scholar]
  31. Stahel W. R. ‘The Performance Economy: Business Models for the Functional Service Economy’, in “Handbook of Performability Engineering”, Springer-Verlag London Ltd, London, UK, 2008, pp. 127–138 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84800-131-2_10 [Google Scholar]
  32. Baines T., Ziaee Bigdeli A., Bustinza O. F., Shi V. G., Baldwin J., and Ridgway K. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 2017, 37, (2), 256 LINK https://doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-06-2015-0312 [Google Scholar]
  33. Lieder M., Asif F. M. A., Rashid A., Mihelič A., and Kotnik S. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 2017, 93, (5–8), 1953 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0610-9 [Google Scholar]
  34. Sanchez B., and Haas C. Constr. Manag. Econ., 2018, 36, (6), 303 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2018.1435895 [Google Scholar]
  35. Bodova E. Modern Machinery Sci. J., 2017, 1700 LINK https://doi.org/10.17973/mmsj.2017_02_2016145 [Google Scholar]
  36. González P., Sarkis J., and Adenso-Díaz B. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manag., 2008, 28, (11), 1021 LINK https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570810910179 [Google Scholar]
  37. Yin R. K. “Case Study Research – Design and Methods”, Sage Publications Inc, Thousand Oaks, USA, 2014, 282 pp [Google Scholar]
  38. Eisenhardt K. M. Acad. Manag. Rev., 1989, 14, (4), 532 LINK https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4308385 [Google Scholar]
  39. Heyes G., Sharmina M., Mendoza J. M. F., Gallego-Schmid A., and Azapagic A. J. Clean. Prod., 2018, 177, 621 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.168 [Google Scholar]
  40. Mendoza J. M. F., Sharmina M., Gallego-Schmid A., Heyes G., and Azapagic A. J. Ind. Ecol., 2017, 21, (3), 526 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12590 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kirchherr J., Piscicelli L., Bour R., Kostense-Smit E., Muller J., Huibrechtse-Truijens A., and Hekkert M. 2018, Ecol. Econ., 150, 264 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.04.028 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hofmann F. J. Clean. Prod., 2019, 224, 361 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.115 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jabbour C. J. C., Jugend D., de Sousa Jabbour A. B. L., Govindan K., Kannan D., and Leal Filho W. J. Environ. Manage., 2018, 206, 236 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.10.019 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15706349546439
Loading
Building Circular Products in an Emerging Economy: An Initial Exploration Regarding Practices, Drivers and Barriers
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 64, 59 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651320X15706349546439
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15706349546439
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15706349546439
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error