Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 66, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 66, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the interactions between collagen and tanning processes performed by ecol-tan®, phosphonium, EasyWhite Tan®, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde-free replacement synthetic tannin (syntan), condensed (mimosa) and hydrolysed (tara) vegetable tanning agents as alternatives to conventional basic chromium sulfate, widely used in the leather industry. Collagen stabilisation with tanning agents was determined by comparative thermal analysis methods: differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and conventional shrinkage temperature () measurement. Analysis techniques and tanning agents were compared and bonding characteristics were ranked by the thermal stabilisation they provided. Chromium tanning agent was also compared with the alternative tanning systems. The results provide a different perspective than the conventional view to provide a better understanding of the relationship between tanning and thermal stability of leather materials.

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651322X16225583463559
2021-06-01
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/66/2/Karavana_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651322X16225583463559&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Sathish M., Dhathathreyan A., and Rao J. R. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2019, 7, (4), 3875 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b04876 [Google Scholar]
  2. Covington T. “Tanning Chemistry: The Science of Leather”, The Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK, 2009 [Google Scholar]
  3. Onem E., Yorgancioglu A., Karavana H. A., and Yilmaz O. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2017, 129, (1), 615 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-017-6175-x [Google Scholar]
  4. Covington A. D., and Thomson R. ‘The Chemistry of Tanning Materials’, in “Conservation of Leather and Related Materials”, eds. Kite M., Elsevier Ltd, Abingdon, UK, 2006, pp. 22–35 LINK https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080454665-11 [Google Scholar]
  5. Yao Q., Wang Y., Chen H., Huang H., and Liu B. ChemistrySelect, 2019, 4, (2), 670 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/slct.201802952 [Google Scholar]
  6. Örk N., Özgünay H., Mutlu M. M., and Öndoğan Z. Tekst. Konf., 2014, 24, (4), 413 LINK https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tekstilvekonfeksiyon/issue/23646/251881 [Google Scholar]
  7. “Future Trends in the World Leather and Leather Products Industry and Trade”, United Nations Industrial Development Organization, Vienna, Austria, 2010, 120 pp LINK https://leatherpanel.org/sites/default/files/publications-attachments/future_trends_in_the_world_leather_and_leather_products_industry_and_trade.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. Scopel B. S., Baldasso C., Dettmer A., and Santana R. M. C. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2018, 113, (4), 122 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/1522 [Google Scholar]
  9. Renner M., Weidner E., and Geihsler H. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2013, 108, (8), 289 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3485 [Google Scholar]
  10. Krishnamoorthy G., Sadulla S., Sehgal P. K., and Mandal A. B. J. Cleaner Prod., 2013, 42, 277 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.11.004 [Google Scholar]
  11. Karavana H. A., Baüaran B., Aslan A., Bitlisli B. O., and Gülümser G. Tekst. Konf., 2011, 21, (3), 305 [Google Scholar]
  12. Dilek Y., Baüaran B., Sancakli A., Bitlisli B. O., and Yorgancioğlu A. J. Soc. Leath. Tech. Chem., 2019, 103, (3), 129 [Google Scholar]
  13. Aravindhan R., Madhan B., and Rao J. R. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2015, 110, (3), 80 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3599 [Google Scholar]
  14. Beghetto V., Agostinis L., Gatto V., Samiolo R., and Scrivanti A. J. Clean. Prod., 2019, 220, 864 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.034 [Google Scholar]
  15. Sreeram K. J., Aravindhan R., Rao J. R., and Nair B. U. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2010, 105, (12), 401 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3237 [Google Scholar]
  16. Sundar V. J., and Muralidharan C. Environ. Process., 2020, 7, (1), 255 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00422-x [Google Scholar]
  17. Williams J. M. V. J. Soc. Leath. Tech. Chem., 2000, 84, 359 [Google Scholar]
  18. Bosch T., Manich A. M., Carilla J., Cot J., Marsal A., Kellert H. J., and Germann H. P. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2002, 97, (11), 441 [Google Scholar]
  19. Budrugeac P., Trandafir V., and Albu M. G. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2003, 72, (2), 581 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024533801497 [Google Scholar]
  20. Wang Y., Guo J., Chen H., and Shan Z. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2010, 99, (1), 295 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-009-0561-y [Google Scholar]
  21. Carüote C., Badea E., Miu L., and Della Gatta G. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2016, 124, (3), 1255 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5344-7 [Google Scholar]
  22. Yang L., Liu Y., Wu Y., Deng L., Liu W., Ma C., and Li L. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2016, 123, (1), 413 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4873-9 [Google Scholar]
  23. Budrugeac P. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2015, 120, (1), 103 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-014-4252-y [Google Scholar]
  24. Nalyanya K. M., Rop R. K., Onyuka A. S., Kilee T., Migunde P. O., and Ngumbu R. G. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2016, 126, (2), 725 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5535-2 [Google Scholar]
  25. Xu W., Li J., Liu F., Jiang Y., Li Z., and Li L. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2017, 128, (2), 1107 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5974-9 [Google Scholar]
  26. Rosu L., Varganici C.-D., Crudu A.-M., and Rosu D. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2018, 134, (1), 583 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7076-3 [Google Scholar]
  27. Yang P., He X., Zhang W., Qiao Y., Wang F., and Tang K. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2017, 127, (3), 2005 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-016-5813-z [Google Scholar]
  28. ‘Leather – Physical and Mechanical Tests – Determination of Shrinkage Temperature up to 100oC’, BS EN ISO 3380:2015, British Standards Institution, London, UK, 30th September, 2015 LINK https://doi.org/10.3403/02730702u [Google Scholar]
  29. Gustavson K. H. “The Chemistry and Reactivity of Collagen”, Academic Press, New York, USA, 1956 [Google Scholar]
  30. Li Y., Shan Z. H., Shao S. X., and Shi K. Q. J. Soc. Leath. Tech. Chem., 2006, 90, (5), 214 [Google Scholar]
  31. Shao S., Shi K., Li Y., Jiang L., and Ma C. Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 2008, 16, (3), 446 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/S1004-9541(08)60103-2 [Google Scholar]
  32. Li R., Wang Y. Z., Shan Z. H., Yang M., Li W., and Zhu H. L. J. Soc. Leath. Tech. Chem., 2016, 100, (1), 19 [Google Scholar]
  33. Plavan V., Koliada M., and Valeika V. J. Soc. Leath. Tech. Chem., 2017, 101, (5), 260 [Google Scholar]
  34. Capparucci C., Gironi F., and Piemonte V. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng., 2011, 6, (4), 606 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/apj.455 [Google Scholar]
  35. Sebestyén Z., Jakab E., Badea E., Barta-Rajnai E., Şendrea C., and Czégény Z. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 2019, 138, 178 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2018.12.022 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kanth S. V., Jayakumar G. C., Ramkumar S. C., Chandrasekaran B., Rao J. R., and Nair B. U. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2012, 107, (5), 106 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3398 [Google Scholar]
  37. Onem E., Gulumser G., Renner M., and Yesil-Celiktas O. J. Supercrit. Fluids, 2015, 104, 259 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.supflu.2015.07.002 [Google Scholar]
  38. Saleem R., Adnan A., and Qureshi F. A. Indian J. Chem. Technol., 2015, 22, (1–2), 48 LINK http://nopr.niscair.res.in/handle/123456789/32338 [Google Scholar]
  39. Budrugeac P., Cucos A., and Miu L. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim., 2014, 116, (1), 141 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-013-3414-7 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1595/205651322X16225583463559
Loading
Interactions Between Collagen and Alternative Leather Tanning Systems to Chromium Salts by Comparative Thermal Analysis Methods
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 66, 215 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651322X16225583463559
/content/journals/10.1595/205651322X16225583463559
/content/journals/10.1595/205651322X16225583463559
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error