Journal Archive

Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2017, 61, (2), 87
doi: 10.1595/205651317X694894

Aspects of Battery Legislation in Recycling and Re-use

Perspectives from the UK and EU regulatory environment



Batteries are present in all areas of life, from electronic devices to electric cars, fork lift trucks and more. But there is a lack of awareness that runs even to the highest levels of the complexities in the battery industry: the chemistries; the applications; the cell sizes; the risks; the legislation. As uptake of batteries grows across many applications there will inevitably be growth in the numbers of battery packs reaching their end-of-life. The challenges of re-use or recycling will become increasingly important.

A number of grant-funded projects that have been trying to develop novel recycling or remanufacturing processes have been surprised, and even hampered by legislation or by the way the waste battery market operates commercially. This article will try to outline some of the ways in which legislation impacts (either positively or negatively) the re-use and recycling of batteries that reach the end of their life in an application.

One key issue that has come to the fore in recent years is that whilst the technological developments of batteries (new chemistries and applications) and the development of markets for them move very quickly, legislative changes to provide necessary controls move extremely slowly – to the extent that there is a risk that technological innovation could be stifled by slow-moving inappropriate legislation.

In the UK there are more than 14 separate pieces of legislation that may impact those who work with batteries on a professional basis at some level, but three of these are more battery-focused than the others, and it is these I will focus on. They are:

  • The Batteries Directive (1) (There have been a number of further directives since this first one that have refined and amended the initial legislation (25))

  • The Hazardous Waste Regulations (611)

  • European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road (ADR) and the Carriage of Dangerous Goods Regulations (1217).

Battery legislation varies widely across the world, and even within Europe where the Batteries Directive set out to unify the environmental aims across all Member States, there are differences in legislation from country to country. There is insufficient space in this article to provide any insight into the very many different regimes of battery regulation, and so I will focus mainly on Europe-wide requirements, and in particular how the UK has addressed these.

The Batteries Directive

The principles of the Batteries Directive are quite straightforward:

  • it applies the principles of Producer Responsibility – so that the producers of batteries are made responsible for meeting any costs of collection and recycling when the batteries they produce become waste

  • it sets targets for the collection of (portable) batteries

  • it sets targets for the quality of recycling that must be achieved when waste batteries are processed – known as the Recycling Efficiency.

These broad aims are universal across the European Community, but how those requirements are met was left up to the individual Member States when the Directive was transposed into each member’s national law. Therefore, each Member State has approached its compliance with the Directive in its own way, and so if a company has a system to deal with waste batteries which works perfectly adequately in one European Member State, it does not necessarily follow that same system would work in another – it is still necessary to understand the detail of how the legislation has been transposed in each country and comply with those requirements.

The directive initially classifies batteries by application into:

  • automotive batteries

  • industrial batteries

  • portable batteries.

and has slightly differing requirements for the collection of waste batteries in each of these categories.

Once collected as waste, all batteries must be sent through a recycling process (landfill and incineration are prohibited), and the Recycling Efficiency target must be met. These targets are based on the chemistry of the batteries (rather than the application), with three targets:

  • 75% for nickel cadmium batteries

  • 65% for lead acid batteries

  • 50% for all other batteries (including lithium-ion, lithium metal, NiMH, alkaline, etc.).

Broadly speaking the Directive is achieving its aims – it is certainly true that many more batteries are being collected and recycled than before its introduction (see Table I) (1821). However, despite the generally positive results, there do remain a number of issues that, if resolved, could make the environmental achievement of the Directive even better, as well as potentially encouraging battery development and the application of technological developments.

Table I

Portable Battery Collection Rates in the UK (Proportion of Waste Batteries Collected Against New Batteries put on the Market)

Year Collection rate, % Quantity, tonnes Source
2009a <10 (18)
2010 9.45% 4325.534 (19)
2012 28.34% 10,873.577 (20)
2015 40.08% 15,238.203 (21)

aPrior to the introduction of the legislation

An example of such issues could be the emergence of a potential market for second life batteries, or other re-use alternatives. Maybe understandably, vehicle manufacturers are concerned about still having full producer responsibility and being asked to pick up the bill for an electric vehicle battery that has had a second life in, say, a stand-by power application. The issue of producer responsibility becomes even cloudier if there is an element of remanufacture before the battery enters its second (or third) life application. If a cell or module in a battery pack is changed as part of a refurbishment, is it still the same battery that it was before, and who is the producer after the re-work has taken place?

Also there is no legal definition for, amongst other things, remanufacture, and whilst a recent set of proposals from the European Commission on the Circular Economy (2234) encourages the re-use of batteries, the lack of legal definition of their activity is a problem for businesses wishing to get involved in the emerging market for extending the life of batteries (through refurbishment, remanufacture, repair, etc.).

When a battery does get to the end of its useful life, and is sent for recycling the Recycling Efficiency target is somewhat problematic. Firstly, the calculation of the Recycling Efficiency is very complex (35), so much so that, in some research undertaken into views of the reporting requirements of the Recycling Efficiency, every European trade association and compliance organisation asked, thought that the information being supplied to the European Commission by Member States was incorrect (36). European battery trade associations are generally calling for a level playing field for Recycling Efficiency calculation and reporting.

There is an opportunity to address some of these issues, as the Batteries Directive is due to be reviewed, and potentially recast in a process that starts at the end of 2016, but that might take several years to achieve any changes.

Hazardous Waste Regulations

The point at which a battery becomes waste is determined by the last user of that battery – and if the user says it’s waste then it is waste, no matter what condition it is in.

Once a battery is declared waste, the way it is handled is governed in the UK by the Waste or Hazardous Waste regulations. Again these are rooted in, and aligned with, European legislation for waste.

Some batteries are deemed to be Hazardous when waste, and some are not (see Table II). UK waste regulations say how waste batteries should be handled when they enter the waste stream. For example, batteries that are Hazardous Waste must be moved by a company with an appropriate carriers’ licence, can only be taken to a site with a suitable waste management licence, every movement must be accompanied by a consignment note that describes the batteries, gives details of the movement, and for which a fee is payable to the Environment Agency. It is also worth noting that since devolution there are slightly different rules about moving hazardous waste in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. The three regions have different consignment note requirements, and if moving waste between regions (say, from Glasgow to Manchester within the UK), Environment Agencies in both regions may need to be notified.

Table II

Categorisation of Battery Types by Hazardousness and Dangerousness

Battery type Hazardous when waste Dangerous (whether new or old) – subject to ADR
Alkaline No No
NiMH No No
Lead acid Yes Yes
NiCad Yes Yes
Lithium and lithium-ion No Yes
Damaged and defective lithium and lithium-ion No Yes

If we consider as an example an electric vehicle battery that the user of the vehicle has decided needs to be changed, then the user will declare the old battery waste, and so it is as far as he is concerned. However, a company operating second-life EV batteries in a stand-by power application may regard that battery as being perfectly adequate for their needs. However, the battery has been declared waste, and it is not necessarily a straightforward process to stop it being waste and get it back into use again. There is a way to achieve this that involves getting approval from the Environment Agency, but in the case of batteries this end of waste process is in its infancy. Re-use of batteries is starting to attract a good deal of interest, and so one might expect to see many more operators taking waste batteries back into use in the near future.

If we are to make the most of the possibilities for re-use, it would certainly help if there was an attitude shift from waste being something that we really don’t care for, and treat accordingly, which not only can reduce the scope for re-use if battery packs are damaged in the disposal process, but also a lack of care in the disposal process can be quite dangerous, leading to an increased risk of fire or pollution from batteries that are leaking or thrown together with a possibility of short circuit (Figure 1).

Fig. 1.

Thoughtlessly discarded batteries can pose a risk

ADR – Transport of Dangerous Goods

The final piece of legislation I will touch on concerns the Transport of Dangerous Goods. Here it is important to distinguish between the hazardous waste regulations categorisation of some batteries as hazardous when waste, and the ADR classification of batteries as Dangerous Goods (for transport), which apply whether batteries are new, used or waste.

Table II shows that some batteries can be Dangerous Goods, but not Hazardous (when waste), some are both Hazardous (when waste) and Dangerous, and some are neither.

The ADR regulations are mainly concerned with how batteries should be packed when being transported. These regulations move quite slowly, with an update adopted internationally every two years. With the emergence of lithium-ion batteries, the safe packing regulations have been running to catch up with the technological advancement. Still today, industry is grappling with how to safely pack and move a full electric vehicle battery that may weigh over 500 kg, and that may have become damaged in an accident. The packing requirements are quite onerous, but this is better than moving potentially flammable or explosive damaged lithium-ion batteries without addressing the risks adequately.

Conclusions

The variety of regulations in force in the UK for batteries are serving a great need, they are in principal necessary and proving broadly effective. However, it is vital that the legislating authorities (whoever they may be in the future) recognise not only the commercial requirements of supporting innovation and technological advancement, so that development is not stifled, but also the environmental and safety requirements that mean batteries can be dealt with without causing damage to people or the environment. This is a balance that is quite difficult to achieve, but that could be too costly either commercially or environmentally if it is not.

References

  1. 1.
    ‘Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6th September 2006 on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators and repealing Directive 91/157/EEC (Text with EEA relevance)’, Official Journal of the European Union, L266/1, 26th September, 2006 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/en/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32006L0066
  2. 2.
    ‘Directive 2008/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2008 amending Directive 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, as regards the implementing powers conferred on the Commission’, Official Journal of the European Union, L76/39, 19th March, 2008 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1484903784603&uri=CELEX:32008L0012
  3. 3.
    ‘Directive 2008/103/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 amending Directive 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators as regards placing batteries and accumulators on the market (Text with EEA relevance)’, Official Journal of the European Union, L327/7, 5th December, 2008 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1484904130866&uri=CELEX:32008L0103
  4. 4.
    ‘Commission Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 of 11 June 2012 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste batteries and accumulators (Text with EEA relevance)’, Official Journal of the European Union, L151/9, 12th June, 2012 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1484904278625&uri=CELEX:32012R0493
  5. 5.
    ‘Directive 2013/56/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators as regards the placing on the market of portable batteries and accumulators containing cadmium intended for use in cordless power tools, and of button cells with low mercury content, and repealing Commission Decision 2009/603/EC (Text with EEA relevance)’, Official Journal of the European Union, L329/5, 10th December, 2013 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?qid=1484904544415&uri=CELEX:32013L0056
  6. 6.
    ‘The Hazardous Waste (England and Wales) Regulations 2005’, SI 2005 No. 894, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, 16th April, 2005 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2005/894/contents/made
  7. 7.
    ‘The Special Waste Regulations 1996’, SI 1996 No. 972, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, 1st September, 1996 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1996/972/made
  8. 8.
    ‘The Special Waste Amendment (Scotland) Regulations 2004’, Scottish SI 2004 No. 112, The Stationery Office Limited, Edinburgh, UK, 1st April, 2004 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2004/112/made
  9. 9.
    ‘The Special Waste Amendment (Scotland) Amendment Regulations 2004’, Scottish SI, 2004 No. 204, The Stationery Office Limited, Edinburgh, UK, 21st May, 2004 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2004/204/made
  10. 10.
    ‘The Waste (Scotland) Regulations 2011’, Scottish SI, 2011 No. 226, The Stationery Office Limited, Edinburgh, UK, 27th March, 2011 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ssi/2011/226/made
  11. 11.
    ‘The Hazardous Waste Regulations (Northern Ireland) 2005’, Statutory Rules of Northern Ireland, 2005 No. 300, The Stationery Office Limited, Belfast, UK, 16th July, 2005 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/nisr/2005/300/made
  12. 12.
    ‘European Agreement concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road’, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, Switzerland, 30th September, 1957 LINK http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/adr/adr_e.html
  13. 13.
    ‘Health and Safety, The Carriage of Dangerous Goods and Use of Transportable Pressure Equipment Regulations 2009’, SI 2009 No. 1348, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, 1st July, 2009 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2009/1348/made
  14. 14.
    ‘Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on classification, labelling and packaging of substances and mixtures, amending and repealing Directives 67/548/EEC and 1999/45/EC and amending Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (Text with EEA relevance)’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 353/1, 31st December, 2008 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:32008R1272
  15. 15.
    ‘Environmental Protection, The Transfrontier Shipment of Waste Regulations 2007’, SI 2007 No. 1711, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, 5th February, 2008 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/1711/contents
  16. 16.
    ‘Environmental Protection, The Transfrontier Shipment of Waste (Amendment) Regulations, 2008’, 2008 No. 9, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, 5th February, 2008 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2008/9/contents
  17. 17.
    ‘Environmental Protection, Customs, The Transfrontier Shipment of Waste (Amendment) Regulations 2014’, 2014 No. 861, The Stationery Office Limited, London, UK, 1st May, 2014 LINK http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2014/861/contents
  18. 18.
    G & P Batteries, private communication, December, 2009
  19. 19.
    ‘UK Portable Batteries Data Summary for the 2010 Compliance Period: Final’, National Packaging Waste Database, The Environment Agency, Rotherham, UK, 30th August, 2012 LINK https://npwd.environment-agency.gov.uk/FileDownload.ashx?FileId=37a409fd-6938-4d49-99b3-0c949ee8119a
  20. 20.
    ‘UK Portable Batteries Data Summary for the 2012 Compliance Period: Final’, National Packaging Waste Database, The Environment Agency, Rotherham, UK, 26th July, 2013 LINK https://npwd.environment-agency.gov.uk/FileDownload.ashx?FileId=0862dd11-a77e-4ebd-8b27-bf9af9fe8147
  21. 21.
    ‘UK Portable Batteries Data Summary for the 2015 Compliance Period: Final’, National Packaging Waste Database, The Environment Agency, Rotherham, UK, 28th June, 2016
  22. 22.
    ‘Commission Staff Working Document Ex-post evaluation of Five Waste Stream Directives Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council reviewing the targets in Directives 2008/98/EC on waste, 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste, and 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste, amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment - Fitness check of five Waste Stream Directives’, SWD(2014) 209 final, 2nd July, 2014 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:52014SC0209
  23. 23.
    ‘Commission Staff Working Document Implementation Plan Accompanying the document Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on waste Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 94/62/EC on packaging and packaging waste Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the landfill of waste Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EC on waste electrical and electronic equipment’, SWD/2015/0260 final, 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015SC0260
  24. 24.
    ‘Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Closing the Loop - An EU action plan for the Circular Economy’, COM(2015) 614 final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614
  25. 25.
    ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2008/98/EC on Waste’, COM/2015/0595 final - 2015/0275 (COD) European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015PC0595
  26. 26.
    ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directives 2000/53/EC on end-of-life vehicles, 2006/66/EC on batteries and accumulators and waste batteries and accumulators, and 2012/19/EU on waste electrical and electronic equipment, Brussels (Text with EEA relevance)’, COM(2015) 593 final, 2015/0272 (COD), 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015PC0593
  27. 27.
    ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 94/62/EC on Packaging and Packaging Waste (Text with EEA relevance)’, COM(2015) 596 final, 2015/0276(COD), 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015PC0596
  28. 28.
    ‘Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Amending Directive 1999/31/EC on the Landfill of Waste (Text with EEA relevance)’, COM(2015) 594 final, 2015/0274(COD), 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015PC0594
  29. 29.
    ‘Circular Economy, Closing the Loop, An Ambitious EU Circular Economy Package’, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2nd December, 2015 LINK https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/ambitious-eu-circular-economy-package_en
  30. 30.
    ‘Circular Economy, Closing the Loop, Helping Consumers Choose Sustainable Products and Services’, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 7th December, 2015 LINK https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/helping-consumers-choose-sustainable-products-and-services_en
  31. 31.
    ‘Circular Economy, Closing the Loop, The Production Phase of the Circular Economy’, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 7th December, 2015 LINK https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/production-phase-circular-economy_en
  32. 32.
    ‘Circular Economy, Closing the Loop, Clear Targets and Tools for Better Waste Management’, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2nd December, 2015 LINK https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/clear-targets-and-tools-better-waste-management_en
  33. 33.
    ‘Circular Economy, Closing the Loop, From Waste to Resources’, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 2nd December, 2015 LINK https://ec.europa.eu/priorities/publications/waste-resources_en
  34. 34.
    ‘European Commission - Fact Sheet, Circular Economy Package: Questions & Answers’, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, MEMO/15/6204, 2nd December, 2015 LINK http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-15-6204_en.htm
  35. 35.
    ‘Commission Regulation (EU) No 493/2012 of 11 June 2012 laying down, pursuant to Directive 2006/66/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council, detailed rules regarding the calculation of recycling efficiencies of the recycling processes of waste batteries and accumulators (Text with EEA relevance)’, Official Journal of the European Union, L 151/9, 12th June, 2012 LINK http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32012R0493
  36. 36.
    M. Green, “Battery Recycling Efficiency – A Review of Progress in Europe”, AS Batteriretur, Borgenhaugen, Norway, October, 2015

Supplementary Information

Information on projects supported by UK Innovate and EU Funding during the present study

LINK https://www.gov.uk/government/organisations/innovate-uk

Reconif - Recovery of Nickel From Filter Cake (Reconif)

Recovery of Nickel From Filter Cake (Reconif) Acknowledges Innovate UK

Recharge

http://www.augeanplc.com/recharge/default.aspx

Abacus - innovAtive Business models and design Approaches for extending the in-serviCe battery life of fUture low carbon vehicleS (ABACUS)

Colabats - Cobalt and Lanthanide Recovery from Batteries


Guidelines for the Waste Directives

Waste – Review of Waste Policy and Legislation, European Commission

LINK http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/target_review.htm

D. Hogg, T. Vergunst, T. Elliott, L. Elliott, and M. Corbin, ‘Support to the Waste Target Reviews: Analysis of New Policy Options’, Report for the European Commission, Bristol, UK, 19th October, 2015

LINK http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/pdf/Analysis%20of%20New%20Policy%20Options%20Eunomia%20report%202015.pdf

Guidelines on the Application of Commission Regulation EU 493/2012 Laying Down Detailed Rules Regarding the Calculation of Recycling Efficiencies of the Recycling Processes of Waste Batteries and Accumulators, European Commission, Environment

LINK http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/batteries/legislation.htm

LINK http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/batteries/pdf/Guidelines%20on%20RE.pdf

The Author


Michael Green was Managing Director of G & P Batteries Ltd for 18 years. In 2015 he left G & P to become an independent consultant to the waste battery industry. In addition to project work covering topics such as battery, hazardous waste and transport legislation and the remanufacture of electric vehicle batteries, Michael has also undertaken consultancy work both in the UK and further afield. Such work has included research into attitudes towards legislation, and a detailed analysis of legal shipment methods for lithium-ion batteries and the ADR regulations. He is also a member of the Steering Committee of the International Congress for Battery Recycling, a conference held annually in Europe.

Related articles

Johnson Matthey Highlights

Guest Editorial: Industrial Biotechnology

Find an article

ArticleSearch