Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 64, Issue 2
  5. Article
Volume 64, Issue 2
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The adsorption and diffusion of species in activated carbons is fundamental to many processes in catalysis and energy storage. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) gives an insight into the molecular-level mechanisms of these phenomena thanks to the unique magnetic shielding properties of the porous carbon structure, which allows adsorbed (in-pore) species to be distinguished from those in the bulk (ex-pore). In this work we investigate exchange dynamics between ex-pore and in-pore solvent species in microporous carbons using a combination of one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) NMR experiments. We systematically compare the effects of four variables: particle size, porosity, solvent polarity and solvent viscosity to build up a picture of how these factors influence the exchange kinetics. We show that exchange rates are greater in smaller and more highly activated carbon particles, which is expected due to the shorter in-pore–ex-pore path length and faster diffusion in large pores. Our results also show that in-pore–ex-pore exchange of apolar solvents is slower than water, suggesting that the hydrophobic chemistry of the carbon surface plays a role in the diffusion kinetics, and that increased viscosity also reduces the exchange kinetics. Our results also suggest the importance of other parameters, such as molecular diameter and solvent packing in micropores.

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15747624015789
2020-01-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/64/2/Griffin_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15747624015789&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Harris R. K., Thompson T. V., Norman P. R., and Pottage C. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1996, 92, (14), 2615 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9969202615 [Google Scholar]
  2. von Ragué Schleyer P., Maerker C., Dransfeld A., Jiao H., and van Eikema Hommes N. J. R. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1996, 118, (26), 6317 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/ja960582d [Google Scholar]
  3. Borchardt L., Oschatz M., Paasch S., Kaskel S., and Brunner E. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, (36), 15177 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp52283k [Google Scholar]
  4. Forse A. C., Griffin J. M., Wang H., Trease N. M., Presser V., Gogotsi Y., Simon P., and Grey C. P. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2013, 15, (20), 7722 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cp51210j [Google Scholar]
  5. Forse A. C., Griffin J. M., Presser V., Gogotsi Y., and Grey C. P. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2014, 118, (14), 7508 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jp502387x [Google Scholar]
  6. Xing Y.-Z., Luo Z.-X., Kleinhammes A., and Wu Y. Carbon, 2014, 77, 1132 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2014.06.031 [Google Scholar]
  7. Hwang S., and Kaärger J. Magn. Reson. Imaging, 2019, 56, 3 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mri.2018.08.010 [Google Scholar]
  8. Furtado F., Galvosas P., Gonçalves M., Kopinke F.-D., Naumov S., Rodríguez-Reinoso F., Roland U., Valiullin R., and Kärger J. Micro. Meso. Mater., 2011, 141, (1–3), 184 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2010.11.015 [Google Scholar]
  9. Alam T. M., and Osborn Popp T. M. Chem. Phys. Lett., 2016, 658, 51 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2016.06.014 [Google Scholar]
  10. Forse A. C., Griffin J. M., Merlet C., Carretero-Gonzalez J., Raji A.-R. O., Trease N. M., and Grey C. P. Nature Energy, 2017, 2, (3), 16216 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/nenergy.2016.216 [Google Scholar]
  11. Macura S., Huang Y., Suter D., and Ernst R. R. J. Magn. Reson., 1981, 43, (2), 259 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-2364(81)90037-8 [Google Scholar]
  12. Levitt M. H. “Spin Dynamics – Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance”, John Wiley and Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2001, 686 pp [Google Scholar]
  13. Bain A. D. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc., 2003, 43, (3–4), 63 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnmrs.2003.08.001 [Google Scholar]
  14. Griffin J. M., Forse A. C., Wang H., Trease N. M., Taberna P.-L., Simon P., and Grey C. P. Faraday Discuss., 2014, 176, 49 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/c4fd00138a [Google Scholar]
  15. Fulik N., Hippauf F., Leistenschneider D., Paasch S., Kaskel S., Brunner E., and Borchardt L. Energy Storage Mater., 2018, 12, 183 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2017.12.008 [Google Scholar]
  16. Cervini L., Lynes O. D., Akien G. R., Kerridge A., Barrow N. S., and Griffin J. M. Energy Storage Mater., 2019, 21, 335 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.05.010 [Google Scholar]
  17. Merlet C., Forse A. C., Griffin J. M., Frenkel D., and Grey C. P. J. Chem. Phys., 2015, 142, (9), 094701 LINK https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4913368 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cansado I. P. P., Gonçalves F. A. M. M., Carrott P. J. M., and Ribeiro Carrott M. M. L. Carbon, 2007, 45, (12), 2454 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2007.07.004 [Google Scholar]
  19. Anderson R. J., McNicholas T. P., Kleinhammes A., Wang A., Liu J., and Wu Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, (25), 8618 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/ja9109924 [Google Scholar]
  20. Luo Z.-X., Xing Y.-Z., Ling Y.-C., Kleinhammes A., and Wu Y. Nature Commun., 2015, 6, 6358 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms7358 [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang H., Forse A. C., Griffin J. M., Trease N. M., Trognko L., Taberna P.-L., Simon P., and Grey C. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, (50), 18968 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/ja410287s [Google Scholar]
  22. Vold R. L., and Hoatson G. L. J. Magn. Reson., 2009, 198, (1), 57 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmr.2009.01.008 [Google Scholar]
  23. Diallo S. O. Phys. Rev. E, 2015, 92, (1), 012312 LINK https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.92.012312 [Google Scholar]
  24. Cadar C., and Ardelean I. Magn. Reson. Chem., 2019, 57, (10), 829 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/mrc.4819 [Google Scholar]
  25. Tsimpanogiannis I. N., Moultos O. A., Franco L. F. M., de M. B., Spera M., Erdős M., and Economou I. G. Mol. Simul., 2019, 45, (4–5), 425 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2018.1511903 [Google Scholar]
  26. Holz M., Heil S. R., and Sacco A. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2000, 2, (20), 4740 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/b005319h [Google Scholar]
  27. Fomin Y. D., Ryzhov V. N., and Tsiok E. N. J. Chem. Phys., 2015, 143, (18), 184702 LINK https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4935197 [Google Scholar]
  28. Shimoyama T., Tashima K., and Ruike M. Coll. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2017, 533, 255 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2017.08.040 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fukano M., Fujimori T., Ségalini J., Iwama E., Taberna P.-L., Iiyama T., Ohba T., Kanoh H., Gogotsi Y., Simon P., and Kaneko K. J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, (11), 5752 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jp311896q [Google Scholar]
  30. Griffin J. ‘Observing Solvent Dynamics in Porous Carbons by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance’, Dataset, Research Directory, Lancaster University, UK, 2019 LINK https://dx.doi.org/10.17635/lancaster/researchdata/314 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15747624015789
Loading
Observing Solvent Dynamics in Porous Carbons by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 64, 152 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651320X15747624015789
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15747624015789
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15747624015789
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error