Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 66, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 66, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Since the early 2010s, less than a handful of studies have been communicated to the hydrogen and fuel cell communities that special care should be adopted, and a systematic approach should be applied, when homogenising catalyst ink slurries using ultrasound in the form of either a laboratory-grade ultrasonic cleaning bath, or an ultrasonic probe (sonifier). In these studies, it was demonstrated that the use of power ultrasound for the homogenisation of catalyst inks can be detrimental if not used appropriately. Unfortunately, and to this day, literature still indicates that ultrasound is still used for the homogenisation of fuel cell and electrolyser catalyst ink slurries and little or even no experimental conditions are given. To what extent is this approach acceptable? This short review paper discusses the importance of using ultrasound adequately to avoid catalyst dissolution and ionomer degradation induced by acoustic cavitation as well as metallic contamination originating from the ultrasonic probe. It also sheds some light on the important aspects and effects of power ultrasound in liquids and surfaces and presents some recommendations on how to use ultrasound adequately for mixing catalyst ink formulations.

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16196162869695
2021-04-28
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/66/1/Pollet_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16196162869695&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Mustain W. E., Chatenet M., Page M., and Kim Y. S. Energy Environ. Sci., 2020, 13, (9), 2805 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee01133a [Google Scholar]
  2. Kocha S. S., Yokokawa H., and Gasteiger H. A. ‘Principles of MEA Preparation: Fuel Cell Technology and Applications: Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells and Systems (PEMFC): Membrane-electrode-assembly (MEA): Principles of MEA Preparation’, in “Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals Technology and Applications”, eds. Vielstich W., 3, Part 3, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, Chichester, UK, 2009 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470974001.f303047 [Google Scholar]
  3. Millington B., Whipple V., and Pollet B. G. J. Power Sources, 2011, 196, (20), 8500 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2011.06.024 [Google Scholar]
  4. Felix C., Jao T.-C., Pasupathi S., and Pollet B. G. J. Power Sources, 2013, 243, 40 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.06.006 [Google Scholar]
  5. Pollet B. G. Catalysts, 2019, 9, (3), 246 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/catal9030246 [Google Scholar]
  6. Kuroki H., Onishi K., Asami K., and Yamaguchi T. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2019, 58, (42), 19545 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b02111 [Google Scholar]
  7. Takahashi I., and Kocha S. S. J. Power Sources, 2010, 195, (19), 6312 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2010.04.052 [Google Scholar]
  8. Pollet B. G. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2010, 35, (21), 11986 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.021 [Google Scholar]
  9. Momand H. ‘The Effect of Ultrasound on Nafion® Polymer in Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cells (PEMFCs)’, MRes Thesis, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, The University of Birmingham, UK, 2013, 118 pp LINK http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/id/eprint/4025 [Google Scholar]
  10. Pollet B. G., and Goh J. T. E. Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 128, 292 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2013.09.160 [Google Scholar]
  11. Pollet B. G. Electrocatalysis, 2014, 5, (4), 330 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s12678-014-0211-4 [Google Scholar]
  12. Shinozaki K., Zack J. W., Richards R. M., Pivovar B. S., and Kocha S. S. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2015, 162, (10), F1144 LINK https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1071509jes [Google Scholar]
  13. Jacobs C. J. ‘Influence of Catalyst Ink Mixing Procedures on Catalyst Layer Properties and In-Situ PEMFC Performance’, MSc thesis, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Cape Town, South Africa, March, 2016, 117 pp LINK http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22932 [Google Scholar]
  14. Wang M., Park J. H., Kabir S., Neyerlin K. C., Kariuki N. N., Lv H., Stamenkovic V. R., Myers D. J., Ulsh M., and Mauger S. A. ACS Appl. Energy Mater., 2019, 2, (9), 6417 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.9b01037 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bapat S., Giehl C., Kohsakowski S., Peinecke V., Schäffler M., and Segets D. ChemRxiv, February, 2020, unpublished preprint Version 3 LINK https://doi.org/10.26434/chemrxiv.13125401.v3 [Google Scholar]
  16. Adamski M., Peressin N., Holdcroft S., and Pollet B. G. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2020, 60, 104758 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104758 [Google Scholar]
  17. Safronova E. Y., Pourcelly G., and Yaroslavtsev A. B. Polym. Degrad. Stab., 2020, 178, 109229 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2020.109229 [Google Scholar]
  18. Safronova E. Y., and Yaroslavtsev A. B. Membr. Membr. Technol., 2021, 3, (1), 8 LINK https://doi.org/10.1134/s2517751621010078 [Google Scholar]
  19. Garsany Y., Baturina O. A., Swider-Lyons K. E., and Kocha S. S. Anal. Chem., 2010, 82, (15), 6321 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/ac100306c [Google Scholar]
  20. Garsany Y., Singer I. L., and Swider-Lyons K. E. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2011, 662, (2), 396 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2011.09.016 [Google Scholar]
  21. Garsany Y., Ge J., St-Pierre J., Rocheleau R., and Swider-Lyons K. E. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2014, 161, (5), F628 LINK https://doi.org/10.1149/2.036405jes [Google Scholar]
  22. Shinozaki K., Zack J. W., Pylypenko S., Pivovar B. S., and Kocha S. S. J. Electrochem. Soc.>, 2015, 162, (12), F1384 LINK https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0551512jes [Google Scholar]
  23. Martens S., Asen L., Ercolano G., Dionigi F., Zalitis C., Hawkins A., Bonastre A. M., Seidl L., Knoll A. C., Sharman J., Strasser P., Jones D., and Schneider O. J. Power Sources, 2018, 392, 274 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.04.084 [Google Scholar]
  24. Song C.-H., and Park J.-S. Energies, 2019, 12, (3), 549 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/en12030549 [Google Scholar]
  25. Guo Y., Pan F., Chen W., Ding Z., Yang D., Li B., Ming P., and Zhang C. Electrochem. Energy Rev., 2021, 4, (1), 67 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s41918-020-00083-2 [Google Scholar]
  26. Anderson G. C., Pivovar B. S., and Alia S. M. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2020, 167, (4), 044503 LINK https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ab7090 [Google Scholar]
  27. Tovini M. F., Hartig-Weiß A., Gasteiger H. A., and El-Sayed H. A. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2021, 168, (1), 014512 LINK https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abdcc9 [Google Scholar]
  28. Inaba M., Kamitaka Y., and Kodama K. J. Electroanal. Chem., 2021, 886, 115115 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2021.115115 [Google Scholar]
  29. Li W., Bi X., Luo M., and Sui P.-C. J. Electrochem. Soc., 2021, 168, (3), 034502 LINK https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/abe725 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pollet B. G., Ashokkumar M., and Ashokkumar M. “Introduction to Ultrasound, Sonochemistry and Sonoelectrochemistry”, SpringerBriefs in Molecular Science: Ultrasound and Sonochemistry Series, Eds. Pollet B. G., Springer Nature Switzerland AG, Cham, Switzerland, 2019, 39 pp LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25862-7 [Google Scholar]
  31. Islam M. H., Paul M. T. Y., Burheim O. S., and Pollet B. G. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2019, 59, 104711 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104711 [Google Scholar]
  32. Islam M. H., Burheim O. S., and Pollet B. G. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2019, 51, 533 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.08.024 [Google Scholar]
  33. Mason T. J., ‘Sonochemistry: Uses of Ultrasound in Chemistry and Related Disciplines’, in “Ultrasound Angioplasty”, ed. R. and Siegel J. 187, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, USA, 1990, pp. 25–54 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-1243-7_2 [Google Scholar]
  34. Suslick K. S. Science, 1990, 247, (4949), 1439 LINK https://doi.org/10.1126/science.247.4949.1439 [Google Scholar]
  35. Armstrong D. A., Huie R. E., Lymar S., Koppenol W. H., Merényi G., Neta P., Stanbury D. M., Steenken S., and Wardman P. Bioinorg. React. Mech., 2014, 9, (1–4), 59 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/irm-2013-0005 [Google Scholar]
  36. Mawson R., Rout M., Ripoll G., Swiergon P., Singh T., Knoerzer K., and Juliano P. Ultrason. Sonochem., 2014, 21, (6), 2122 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultsonch.2014.04.005 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hansen H. E., Seland F., Sunde S., Burheim O. S., and Pollet B. G. Mater. Adv., 2021, 2, (6), 1962 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ma00909a [Google Scholar]
  38. Ashokkumar M., Sunartio D., Kentish S., Mawson R., Simons L., Vilkhu K., and Versteeg C. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol., 2008, 9, (2), 155 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifset.2007.05.005 [Google Scholar]
  39. Curnick O. J., Pollet B. G., and Mendes P. M. RSC Adv., 2012, 2, (22), 8368 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ra21071a [Google Scholar]
  40. Skrabalak S. E. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 2009, 11, (25), 4930 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/b823408f [Google Scholar]
  41. Sesis A., Hodnett M., Memoli G., Wain A. J., Jurewicz I., Dalton A. B., Carey J. D., and Hinds G. J. Phys. Chem. B, 2013, 117, (48), 15141 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jp410041y [Google Scholar]
  42. Weissler A. J. Appl. Phys., 1950, 21, (2), 171 LINK https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699618 [Google Scholar]
  43. Basedow A. M., and Ebert K. H. ‘Ultrasonic Degradation of Polymers in Solution’, in “Physical Chemistry”, Advances in Polymer Science Series, Vol. 22, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, 1977, pp. 83–148 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-07942-4_6 [Google Scholar]
  44. Price G. J., and Smith P. F. Polym. Int., 1991, 24, (3), 159 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.4990240306 [Google Scholar]
  45. Price G. J., West P. J., and Smith P. F. Ultrason. Sonochem., 1994, 1, (1), S51 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/1350-4177(94)90028-0 [Google Scholar]
  46. Price G. J., White A. J., and Clifton A. A. Polymer, 1995, 36, (26), 4919 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0032-3861(96)81616-8 [Google Scholar]
  47. Sun X., Liu J., Ji L., Wang G., Zhao S., Yoon J. Y., and Chen S. Sci. Total Environ., 2020, 737, 139606 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139606 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gogate P. R., Pandit A. B., and Ashokkumar M. ‘Cavitation Generation and Usage Without Ultrasound: Hydrodynamic Cavitation’, in “Theoretical and Experimental Sonochemistry Involving Inorganic Systems”, eds. Pankaj, Springer Science and Business Media BV, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2011, pp. 69–106 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-3887-6_3 [Google Scholar]
  49. Shah Y. T., Pandit A. B., Moholkar V. S., ‘Energy Efficiency and the Economics of the Cavitation Conversion Process’, in “Cavitation Reaction Engineering”, ed. and Luss D. Springer Science and Business Media, New York, USA, 1999, pp. 277–312 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4787-7_8 [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16196162869695
Loading
Using Ultrasound to Effectively Homogenise Catalyst Inks: Is this Approach Still Acceptable?
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 66, 61 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651321X16196162869695
/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16196162869695
/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16196162869695
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error