Stability and Applicability of Retinyl Palmitate Loaded Beeswax Microcapsules for Cosmetic Use
Journal Archive
doi: 10.1595/205651322X16225611489810
Stability and Applicability of Retinyl Palmitate Loaded Beeswax Microcapsules for Cosmetic Use
Material properties and stability of microencapsulated actives
Article Synopsis
In our previous study, retinyl palmitate was successfully encapsulated by melt dispersion using waxes as shell materials. Herein, the objective of the present research is to evaluate the shelf life and kinetic release of the developed microcapsules. The study was conducted by measuring actual loading capacity over a period of time using spectroscopic analysis. The transfer percentage of particles from nonwoven facial wipes to skin-like surfaces was also investigated by simulating the rubbing mechanism with a robotic transfer replicator. Although particles stored as powder form under room temperature showed only eight days of shelf-life, particles stored as a dispersion in a refrigerator maintained 60% of the theoretical loading capacity after one month. The kinetic release profile of the particles in ethanol with shaking at 100 rpm and 37±2°C showed an initial burst in the first half an hour, followed by a sustained release. It also showed that 98% of the retinyl palmitate content released within 4 h. Particles incorporated into wet nonwoven wipes gave approximately 22% transfer to skin-like fabric. Thus, the study shows potentials of delivering skincare properties by means of retinyl palmitate capsule loaded textile substrates.
1. Introduction
In cosmetic science and technology, retinoids are widely recognised to address skin concerns such as acne, rosacea, pigmentation and symptoms of photoageing (1). Retinoids are chemical compounds of vitamin A, which include retinoic acid, retinal, retinol and retinol derivatives. Retinoic acid has been well researched and found to be effective as a topical treatment for photoageing, hyperpigmentation, wrinkles and dry skin (2–5). However, many patients suffer from retinoid dermatitis as a side effect of the aggressive reaction of retinoic acid (6). Therefore, researchers have been studying retinol and its derivatives for cosmetic applications to impart the benefits by minimising the irritation on the skin (7–10). After being topically absorbed by the skin, retinol, retinal and their derivatives need to enzymatically convert into a biologically active form, i.e. retinoic acid, through oxidative processes (11). The chemical structures of the retinoids and their mechanism of skin treatment is discussed in our previous work (12).
Many studies revealed that topically applied retinoids, including retinyl palmitate (a lipophilic, ester derivative of retinol), are effective in skin penetration, percutaneous absorption, metabolisation to retinol and retinoic acid and skin treatment (13–20). However, instability has been a challenge to incorporate retinoids into cosmetics due to oxidation of retinol over time and its sensitivity to heat and light (21, 22). Microencapsulation can solve this problem by protecting active ingredients from reactive compounds in formulations as well as releasing them when applied on to the skin (23). In the perspective of cosmetic formulations, retinoids have been reported to be successfully encapsulated. Torrado et al. demonstrated encapsulation of retinol palmitate in albumin by emulsion method, where coagulation of the emulsion followed by decantation facilitated the isolation of albumin microspheres (24). Jenning et al. encapsulated vitamin A into glyceryl behenate through dispersion of hot lipid phase and high-pressure homogenisation (25). Retinol-chitosan microparticles were prepared by Kim et al., using ultrasonication and evaporation of solvent (26). Gangurde and his group reported microencapsulation of vitamin A palmitate in maltodextrin/modified starches using spray drying method (27). We have explored the potential of the melt dispersion method to successfully encapsulate retinyl palmitate (12). The employed melt dispersion method is an inexpensive, environment-friendly method with minimum use of synthetic chemicals.
In order to assess the quality of topical products containing active substances, tests include content uniformity analysis, pH measurement, the content of water and preservatives, particle size analysis and assays (28). Gangurde and Amin (27) described the separation of oil and water phases, change in colour, inconsistency of formulation and development of unpleasant odour as some indications of the instability for vitamin A palmitate microcapsules. In this study, we evaluated the visual change in colour and retention of retinyl palmitate content to understand the stability as well as the shelf life of prepared microcapsules.
In vitro kinetic release studies are performed to understand the release rate of active ingredients in the body and also to understand the storage stability. The mechanism of the controlled release of active ingredients can be broadly categorised into physical and chemical mechanisms. According to Acharya and Park (29), the physical mechanisms may involve diffusion of the drug through the polymer matrix, degradation or dissolution of the polymer layer, osmotic pressure or use of ion exchange for ionised drugs. On the contrary, the chemical mechanism involves the alteration of active molecules (30). In the case of waxy materials as matrix components, the most significant release mechanisms of active ingredients are the diffusion of the active core through the matrix and erosion of wax matrix through ester hydrolysis reaction (31).
Topically applied active ingredients are often incorporated into a carrier such as creams, gels or textile substrates to ensure targeted transdermal delivery. Microcapsules can be incorporated into textile substrate by means of coating, impregnation or immersion, spraying or printing (32). Several studies have investigated the application of microencapsulation in cosmetic textiles. Yamato et al. formulated treatment liquids containing microcapsules of skincare substances and binding agents and incorporated them into textile structure through spraying (33). Wang and Chen prepared aromatherapeutic textile with fragrance-loaded cyclodextrin inclusion compound by conventional pad-thermo fixing method (34). Koenig formulated a cleansing composition with microencapsulated delivery vehicle comprised of active agents that can be introduced into wet wipes by various means (35). Cheng et al. developed vitamin C-loaded gelatin microcapsules using emulsion hardening process that can be grafted into textiles to impart skincare benefits (36). Alonso reported the preparation of polyamide cosmetotextile comprising of gallic acid (GA)-loaded poly-ɛ-caprolactone (PCL) microspheres to impart antioxidant effect to skin (37). Fiedler et al. incorporated aloe vera-cornstarch microcapsules obtained through coacervation into cotton nonwoven fabric, where impregnation mechanism was applied by using butane tetracarboxylic acid (BTCA) as a binding agent (38).
Textile-based substrates as delivery vehicles have their benefits due to flexibility and ease of application (30). The open, permeable structure, as well as large surface area, make the textile structure ideal support for topical drug delivery applications (39). Therefore, we aim to explore nonwoven facial wipe as a mean to incorporate microcapsules containing retinoids and evaluate the transfer of microparticles from the substrate to skin.
In our previous work, we successfully encapsulated retinyl palmitate using waxes as shell material (12). Natural waxes such as beeswax are skin-friendly and popular as cosmetic additives. Beeswax has antiinflammatory and antimicrobial properties, suitable for topical treatment (40, 41). Besides, beeswax is also efficient to improve the barrier function of the skin (42).
The overall objective of the present study was to evaluate the shelf life and kinetic release of the developed microparticles by measuring the loaded content of retinyl palmitate over time and also to investigate the simulated transfer of microparticles from the wet nonwoven substrate to skin-like fabric by using a robotic transfer replicator.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1 Materials
Refined, white beeswax pearls and retinyl palmitate (vitamin A) of 1.7 MIU g–1 (MIU = milli-international units) were purchased from Bulk Apothecary (Aurora, OH, USA) and Fisher Scientific USA (Pittsburg, PA, USA), respectively. Ethanol was obtained from Decon Laboratories, Inc (King of Prussia, PA, USA). Compression fabric (warp knit: 77% nylon and 23% spandex) was obtained from the Marena Group (Lawrenceville, GA, USA). Pampers® Aqua PureTM nonwoven wipes were also used as a carrier to transfer microparticles from the substrate to skin.
2.2 Microencapsulation of Retinyl Palmitate and Effect of Process Variables
We microencapsulated retinyl palmitate by melt dispersion technique and investigated the effect of four process variables on the produced microcapsules, such as different theoretical loading capacity (10%, 15%, 25%), types of wax (beeswax, carnauba wax, paraffin wax), emulsifier concentrations (0%, 1%, 2%) and stirring speeds (180 rpm, 230 rpm, 280 rpm) in our previous study (12). The statistical analysis showed that theoretical loading capacity and surfactant (%) were the most significant factors and we were able to determine that the highest theoretical loading (25%) and highest surfactant (2%) selected in that study can provide us high actual loading with the small size of the particles. There was no significant difference found among the effects of type of wax on loading capacity, encapsulation efficiency, antioxidant activity or mean size of particles. Hence we decided to conduct further study selecting beeswax as the shell material because of its natural skincare benefits as well as operational convenience due to low melting point (65°C). We selected 280 rpm stirring speed to facilitate dispersion of the oil-in-water emulsion and formation of small size particles.
2.3 Thermal characterisation by Differential Scanning Calorimetry
Thermal analysis of the beeswax, retinyl palmitate and retinyl palmitate-loaded beeswax microcapsules was carried out by using Mettler-Toledo GmbH DSC821e (Greifensee, Switzerland) instrument, where a standard empty aluminium pan was used as the reference. The weight of the samples was within 2–9 mg, and the samples were scanned from 25°C to 100°C under nitrogen atmosphere with a heating rate of 10°C min–1.
2.4 Shelf Life Study
After preparing the microcapsules with 25% theoretical loading, we looked into the shelf life of microcapsules by measuring the actual loading percentage, i.e. the content of retinyl palmitate in a fixed amount of capsules over a period of time, both in powder and dispersion forms. We evaluated the shelf life of the beeswax microcapsules (approximately 71% encapsulation efficiency) in powder form, where they were filtered and dried before storing in an enclosed petri dish under room temperature; and also in dispersion form (approximately 75% encapsulation efficiency), where the particles were kept dispersed within the emulsion during preparation, stored inside dark vials in refrigerator and a portion was filtered on each day of measurement (Day 1, Day 4, Day 8, Day 15 and Day 31).
An extraction from 0.1 g of microcapsules was performed, by heating the capsule in 20 ml of ethanol solution to release the vitamin content and then filtering the wax residue. The concentration of supernatant aliquots was measured at 327 nm by a Shimadzu Corporation UV-2401PC spectrophotometer (Kyoto, Japan). The amount of retinyl palmitate was determined from a standard curve of known concentrations.
2.5 Kinetic Release study
We conducted an in vitro kinetic release study similar to prior literature (27, 43) with some modification based on particle content, solvent type and machine parameters. The retinyl palmitate release profile from 3 g of suspended particles (approximately 77% encapsulation efficiency) was examined in 600 ml of pure ethanol. The study was performed in a New Brunswick Scientific C24 (Eppendorf, Germany) incubator shaker with a speed of 100 rpm and temperature set at 37±2°C. Supernatant aliquots of 2 ml were withdrawn and replaced by the fresh medium at appropriate time intervals (1 min, 5 min, 15 min, 30 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h). The supernatants containing dissolved retinyl palmitate were diluted and analysed by ultraviolet-visible (UV–vis) spectroscopy at 327 nm. The results were compared with a standard to calculate the vitamin A concentration and to evaluate the release ratio.
2.6 Simulated Transfer Study from the Textile Substrate to Skin
We used a robotic transfer replicator (Figure 1) to simulate the transfer of microparticles from a nonwoven wipe to the skin and evaluate the transfer percentage, by means of a similar method as described by Yu et al. (44). 1 g of microparticles was spread as evenly as possible by a spatula over a commercial nonwoven wipe containing 99% water that acted as a donor surface with a diameter of 133 mm. The receptor material was a compression fabric, i.e. a warp knit with a composition of 77% nylon/23% spandex (fabric weight 276 g cm–2). This fabric was chosen because the study by Yu et al. (44) regarding transfer of particulates from carpet surface to human skin-like receptors revealed that this fabric replicated the human skin, particularly finger pads best as a receptor material. The receptor fabric was attached to an aluminium nose piece with the help of O-ring made of rubber. After the activation of the replicator, the nose piece descended the receptor fabric onto the donor surface and rubbed the receptor against the donor by executing a certain number of motions (imitating an hourglass pattern) under a constant pressure maintained by the programmed hydraulic system. After performing this rub cycle, the nose piece was raised and delivered onto a glass jar containing 20 ml of ethanol. The fabric was released into ethanol and shaken vigorously, followed by sonication for 2 h so that all the particle content is released into ethanol. Then aliquots were removed for assay in an UV–vis spectrophotometer to measure the content of retinyl palmitate. Finally, the amount of transfer of retinyl palmitate was calculated in percentage.
Fig. 1.
Robotic transfer replicator for simulating the transfer of microparticles from nonwoven wipe to skin-like fabric: nonwoven moisturising wipe containing 1 g of microcapsules acted as a donor surface, whereas a compression fabric (warp knit; 77% nylon/23% spandex) was the receptor material. The replicator clutched the nose piece and descended the receptor fabric onto the donor surface and rubbed the receptor against the donor by executing programmed motion. After performing this rub cycle, the nose piece was raised and delivered onto a glass jar containing ethanol
2.7 Statistical Analysis
All the measurements for shelf life study were performed in triplicates, whereas the measurements of kinetic release study and simulated transfer study were performed in duplicates. The results have been reported as the mean values and their corresponding standard deviations.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1 Thermal Analysis
Figure 2 shows differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) scans of beeswax, retinyl palmitate and beeswax microcapsules with 25% theoretical loading capacity. In the thermogram of retinyl palmitate, a sharp endothermic peak is observed at 34.33°C, which corresponds to its melting point. However, it is observed that the microcapsules show no endotherms corresponding to the melting point of retinyl palmitate. This implies that retinyl palmitate dissolved within the matrix of beeswax when the temperature reached its melting point (45). This observation was consistent with the result found by Milanovic et al. (46), where encapsulated ethyl vanillin dissolved in the carnauba wax matrix. Untreated beeswax and retinyl palmitate-loaded beeswax microcapsules show their melting peaks at 65.67°C and 63°C, respectively. The slight decrease in the melting point of the particle should be due to the mixing of retinyl palmitate and wax because of plasticisation. A second peak is observed for microcapsules at higher temperature (slightly higher than melting temperature), which could be because of fraction of large crystallites formed after encapsulation process that showed higher melting.
Fig. 2.
DSC thermogram of untreated beeswax, retinyl palmitate and retinyl palmitate-loaded beeswax microcapsules (25% w/w theoretical loading capacity): retinyl palmitate shows a sharp endothermic at 34.33°C, which corresponds to its melting point. retinyl palmitate-beeswax microcapsules show no endotherms corresponding to the melting point of retinyl palmitate, implying that retinyl palmitate dissolved within the matrix of beeswax when the temperature reached its melting point. Untreated beeswax and retinyl palmitate-loaded beeswax microcapsules showed their melting peaks at 65.67°C and 63°C, respectively. The slight decrease in the melting point of the particle resulted from the mixing of the retinyl palmitate and the beeswax matrix
3.2 Shelf Life
Figure 3 shows the shelf life study of the beeswax microcapsules in: (a) powder form stored under room temperature; (b) dispersion form stored in a refrigerator. When the particles were evaluated in powder form under room temperature, the microcapsules lost their active content within 8 days (Figure 3(a)). This phenomenon can be attributed to the diffusion of retinyl palmitate through the wax shell. The high compatibility between lipophilic, low molecular weight active ingredients with wax is the major cause of diffusion (47). Diffusion can be accelerated in small-sized particles due to the availability of larger contact areas as well as due to pores existing in the shell matrix (48).
Fig. 3.
Shelf life study of: (a) retinyl palmitate loaded beeswax microparticles stored as powder under room temperature. The particles in powder form under room temperature lost their active content within 8 days; (b) retinyl palmitate loaded beeswax microparticles stored as a dispersion in a refrigerator. The particles stored as dispersion in the refrigerator showed no significant decrease in retinyl palmitate content until the 15th day
Djordjević et al. (31) described the internal structure of particles produced by melt dispersion with the wax shell to be nonhomogeneous with matrix or hollow-shell morphology. Therefore in the prepared microcapsules, retinyl palmitate is distributed within the wax shell matrix. With the course of time, the core content comes up to the surface and diffuse through the shell. From Figure 4(a), the gradual change in the colour of beeswax microcapsules supports the phenomenon of diffusion as a plausible explanation. The particles stored as powder form appear to be bright yellow after the retinyl palmitate diffuses to the surface and they turn white (beeswax) when almost all of the core content leaches out.
Fig. 4.
Gradual change in colour observed for: (a) retinyl palmitate-beeswax microparticles stored as powder under room temperature; (b) retinyl palmitate-beeswax microparticles stored in dispersion
On the other hand, when the retinyl palmitate-beeswax particles were stored in the dispersed aqueous emulsion in a refrigerator, they retained the core material and showed no significant decrease in retinyl palmitate content until the 15th day (Figure 3(b)). The variability in size distribution of different batches of filtered particles may account for the slight increase observed in actual loading capacity (Figure 3(b)). After 30 days, a decrease in loading was observed, which can be explained by ester hydrolysis of the beeswax while stored in aqueous emulsion resulting in the release of the content (49). retinyl palmitate-beeswax particles stored in the dispersed aqueous emulsion in the refrigerator do not show a significant visual difference in colour when filtered (Figure 4(b)).
3.3 Kinetic Release study
The release profile (Figure 5) of retinyl palmitate-beeswax microcapsule showed an initial burst followed by a slower release of the vitamin entrapped inside the beeswax matrix. Due to the initial burst effect, 7% of the retinyl palmitate released at the first minute, leading to around 55% release in the first half an hour. After the initial rapid release, the release profile showed a sustained release over time. Within 4 h, approximately 98% of retinyl palmitate was released. A similar pattern of release was found by Kheradmandnia et al. (49) from ketoprofen-loaded solid lipid nanoparticles incorporated in the matrix of beeswax-carnauba wax mixture. Zigoneanu et al. (50) described the phenomenon of such initial burst as the result of the cumulative effect of diffusion of the core through the matrix, penetration of dissolution medium into the particle, and degradation of the shell matrix. As retinyl palmitate is soluble in ethanol, this explanation is agreeable to our result. Permeation of ethanol through the pores of the shell matrix and simultaneous diffusion of retinyl palmitate through the matrix facilitated the fast dissolution of the vitamin into ethanol. Duclairoir et al. has reported similar release profile for α-tocopherol from wheat gliadin nanoparticles, where mathematical models were demonstrated for the bistep release, i.e. the burst effect and the slower diffusion process (51). While the initial burst could not be described by their model, the time-dependent slow release showed a good fit (R2 = 0.90) for the model in Equation (i):
Fig. 5.
The kinetic release profile of retinyl palmitate-beeswax microcapsules (25% w/w theoretical loading) showed an initial burst followed by a slower release of the vitamin entrapped inside the beeswax matrix. Due to the initial burst effect, 7% of the retinyl palmitate released at the first minute, leading to around 55% release in the first half an hour. After the burst effect, the release profile showed a sustained release over time. Within 4 h, approximately 98% of retinyl palmitate was released
Here, M0 is the amount of active content incorporated, Mt is the amount of release core at time t, D is the diffusion coefficient and R is the radius of the particle. Thus the sustained release was related to the diffusivity of the active core inside the matrix system, the surface area of the particle and the loaded content.
From this result, we can understand that alcohol-based cosmetic formulations will not be stable over time as the core content would be released in the carrier substrate during the storage period, making retinyl palmitate susceptible to oxidation and degradation. On the contrary, as we already observed in the shelf life study, an aqueous medium prevents the active content from releasing from the capsule because of having no affinity to the lipophilic content. As a result, a water-based formulation would be suitable to contain the particles for cosmetic applications.
3.4 Simulated Transfer Study from the Textile Substrate to Skin
From the transfer study, we found that 21.7±0.02% of retinyl palmitate was transferred to the receptor material from the donor surface of wet nonwoven wipe after the preprogrammed rubbing cycle. The percentage falls within the range reported by Yu et al. in their study of transfer of particulates from carpet surfaces to human skin. Although this amount may vary depending on encapsulation efficiency, method of particle incorporation, and the amount of particle incorporated, this study demonstrates the potential of using such microparticles into facial wipes to impart skincare properties. Knaggs, in his skin-ageing handbook, mentioned that 0.05–0.1% tretinoin (retinoic acid) was effective to reduce signs of ageing in Asians (52). Oliveira et al. demonstrated in their study that topical application 1% retinyl palmitate has promising results for the treatment of skin ageing (53). According to Gangurde et al., the recommended concentration for topical semisolid formulation of vitamin A palmitate is 0.05%–0.3% (27). Thus, considering the approved dosage of retinoids, absorption and conversion rate of retinyl palmitate to retinoic acid within the skin, a proper formulation has to be developed in further study.
4. Future Studies
For a better understanding of the storage conditions on the stability, our next research focus will be on the following studies:
-
(a) Comparative study between the shelf life of microscapsules in powdered forms of retinyl palmitate-carnauba wax and retinyl palmitate-beeswax microcapsules in a refrigerator, as well as the stability of the same forms at room temperature
-
(b) Comparative study between the shelf life of microcapsules in dispersion forms of retinyl palmitate-carnauba wax and retinyl palmitate-beeswax stored: (i) in a refrigerator; and (ii) at room temperature
-
(c) Study the effect of temperature on the diffusion of active retinyl palmitate core through the shell materials for retinyl palmitate-carnauba wax and retinyl palmitate-beeswax microcapsules of the same forms (powder as well as dispersion) in storage
-
(d) Conduct release study on water-based formulations of retinyl palmitate-loaded microcapsules using Franz cell diffusion test with a method similar to Salamanca et al. (54) and thus determine the appropriate cosmetic formulation.
Conclusion
This research contributes to the study of stability, release profile and potentiality of incorporating retinyl palmitate-beeswax microcapsules in facial wipes as a means to transfer active ingredient to the skin. It was determined from the shelf study that the microcapsules in dispersion form could maintain active content for 30 days compared to 8 days for the powder form under room temperature. Hence water-based formulations would preserve the stability of the capsules better than the powdered form. The kinetic release study showed that ethanol would accelerate the release of the content. Further study on release in different mediums and storage conditions will help to determine suitable formulation of retinyl palmitate-loaded cosmetics. The simulated transfer study showed around 22% transfer of retinyl palmitate from nonwoven to receptor fabric, thus demonstrated potentials for successful transfer from retinyl palmitate-loaded facial wipes to skin to impart skincare properties. Future study with appropriate dosage and formulation will contribute to develop innovative cosmeceutical and cosmetotextile products containing retinyl palmitate.
References
- 1.
L. Baumann, ‘The Baumann Skin-Type Indicator: A Novel Approach to Understanding Skin Type’, in “Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology”, 3rd Edn., eds. A. O. Barel, M. Paye, H. I. Maibach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2010 LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/b15273-6
- 2.
L. H. Kligman, C. H. Duo and A. M. Kligman, Connect. Tissue Res., 1984, 12, (2), 139 LINK https://doi.org/10.3109/03008208408992779
- 3.
M. J. Connor, and N. J. Lowe, ‘Retinoid Stimulation of Epidermal Cell Growth in Vivo’, in “Retinoids: New Trends in Research and Therapy”, ed. J.-H. Saurat, Retinoid Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland, September, 1984, Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland, 1985, pp. 198–201 LINK https://doi.org/10.1159/000429403
- 4.
P. M. Elias, and M. L. Williams, ‘Retinoid Effects on Epidermal Differentiation. Supramolecular versus Molecular Observations’, in “Retinoids: New Trends in Research and Therapy”, ed. J.-H. Saurat, Retinoid Symposium, Geneva, Switzerland, September, 1984, Karger AG, Basel, Switzerland, 1985, pp. 138–158 LINK https://doi.org/10.1159/000429395
- 5.
A. A. Haas and K. A. Amdt, J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., 1986, 15, (4), 870 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0190-9622(86)70244-2
- 6.
“Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology”, 4th Edn., eds. A. O. Barel, M. Paye, H. I. Maibach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2014 LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/b16716
- 7.
S. Mordon, J. M. Lagarde, M. P. Vienne, T. Nocera, F. Verriere and S. Dahan, J. Cosmet. Laser Ther., 2004, 6, (1), 5 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/14764170310016388
- 8.
C. Bertin, C. Robert, M. Jousselin, N. Issachar and E. Camel, ‘Treating Wrinkles with Dimethylaminoethanol, Retinol and Mineral Salts’, Cosmetics and Toiletries, 3rd October, 2013 LINK https://www.cosmeticsandtoiletries.com/cosmetic-ingredients/actives/article/21835927/treating-wrinkles-with-dimethylaminoethanol-retinol-and-mineral-salts
- 9.
R. E. B. Watson, S. P. Long, J. J. Bowden, J. Y. Bastrilles, S. P. Barton and C. E. M. Griffiths, Br. J. Dermatol., 2007, 158, (3), 472 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2133.2007.08364.x
- 10.
Y.-S. Song, B.-Y. Chung, M.-Y. Chang, M.-E. Park, S.-J. Lee, W.-G. Cho and S.-H. Kang, J. Soc. Cosm. Sci. Korea, 1999, 25, (4), 145 LINK https://www.koreascience.or.kr/article/JAKO199908813345414.view
- 11.
S. B. Kurlandsky, J.-H. Xiao, E. A. Duell, J. J. Voorhees and G. J. Fisher, J. Biol. Chem., 1994, 269, (52), 32821 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9258(20)30065-x
- 12.
A. Nandy, E. Lee, A. Mandal, R. Saremi and S. Sharma, J. Microencapsul., 2020, 37, (3), 205 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/02652048.2020.1720029
- 13.
J. Boehnlein, A. Sakr, J. L. Lichtin and R. L. Bronaugh, Pharm. Res., 1994, 11, 1155 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1018941016563
- 14.
J. Bailly, M. Crettaz, M. H. Schifflers and J. P. Marty, Exp. Dermatol., 1998, 7, (1), 27 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0625.1998.tb00299.x
- 15.
C. Antille, C. Tran, O. Sorg, P. Carraux, L. Didierjean and J.-H. Saurat, J. Invest. Dermatol., 2003, 121, (5), 1163 LINK https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12519.x
- 16.
K. Abdulmajed and C. M. Heard, Int. J. Pharm., 2004, 280, (1–2), 113 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.05.008
- 17.
S. Kang, E. A. Duell, G. J. Fisher, S. C. Datta, Z.-Q. Wang, A. P. Reddy, A. Tavakkol, J. Y. Yi, C. E. M. Griffiths, J. T. Elder and J. J. Voorhees, J. Invest. Dermatol., 1995, 105, (4), 549 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12323445
- 18.
E. A. Duell, F. Derguini, S. Kang, J. T. Elder and J. J. Voorhees, J. Invest. Dermatol., 1996, 107, (2), 178 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/1523-1747.ep12329576
- 19.
T. Tsunoda and K. Takabayashi, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem., 1995, 46, (4), 191
- 20.
A. Vahlquist, Dermatology, 1999, 199, (1), 3 LINK https://doi.org/10.1159/000051371
- 21.
P. Clarys, and A. O. Barel, ‘New Trends in Antiaging Cosmetic Ingredients and Treatments: An Overview’, in “Handbook of Cosmetic Science and Technology”, 3rd Edn., eds. A. O. Barel, M. Paye, H. I. Maibach, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2010 LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/b15273-29
- 22.
E. Andersson, I. Rosdahl, H. Törmä and A. Vahlquist, Melanoma Res., 1999, 9, (4), 339 LINK https://doi.org/10.1097/00008390-199908000-00001
- 23.
S. Hawkins, M. Wolf, G. Guyard, S. Greenberg, and N. Dayan, ‘Microcapsules as a Delivery System’, in “Delivery System Handbook for Personal Care and Cosmetic Products”, ed. M. R. Rosen, William Andrew Inc, Norwich, NY, USA, 2005, pp. 191–213 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-081551504-3.50014-6
- 24.
S. Torrado, J. J. Torrado and R. Cadórniga, Int. J. Pharm., 1992, 86, (2–3), 147 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-5173(92)90191-4
- 25.
V. Jenning, A. Gysler, M. Schäfer-Korting and S. H. Gohla, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 2000, 49, (3), 211 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0939-6411(99)00075-2
- 26.
D.-G. Kim, Y.-I. Jeong, C. Choi, S.-H. Roh, S.-K. Kang, M.-K. Jang and J.-W. Nah, Int. J. Pharm., 2006, 319, (1–2), 130 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.03.040
- 27.
A. B. Gangurde and P. D. Amin, J. Encapsulation Adsorpt. Sci., 2017, 7, (1), 10 LINK https://doi.org/10.4236/jeas.2017.71002
- 28.
C. T. Ueda, V. P. Shah, K. Derdzinski, G. Ewing, G. Flynn, H. Maibach, M. Marques, H. Rytting, S. Shaw, K. Thakker and A. Yacobi, Dissolution Technol., 2010, 17, (4), 12 LINK https://doi.org/10.14227/dt170410p12
- 29.
G. Acharya and K. Park, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 2006, 58, (3), 387 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2006.01.016
- 30.
S. Petrusic, and V. Koncar, ‘Controlled Release of Active Agents from Microcapsules Embedded in Textile Structures’, in “Smart Textiles and Their Applications”, ed. V. Koncar, Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2016, pp. 89–114 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-100574-3.00005-9
- 31.
V. Djordjević, S. Lević, T. Koupantsis, F. Mantzouridou, A. Paraskevopoulou, V. Nedović, and B. Bugarski, ‘Melt-Dispersion Technique for Encapsulation’, in “Handbook of Encapsulation and Controlled Release”, 1st Edn., ed. M. Mishra, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2015 LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/b19038-32
- 32.
B. P. Bojana and S. Marica, Phys. Sci. Rev., 2016, 1, (1), 20150003 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/psr-2015-0003
- 33.
Y. Yamato, T. Yoshida, M. Kikuchi, M. Okamoto, K. Miyoshi, S. Fukuda, T. Fuse, T. Yamauchi, Y. Ogawa, S. Mutagami, S. Shiomura and Y. Mizukami, Kanebo Ltd, Japan, ‘Microcapsule, Treating Liquids Containing the Same, and Textile Structure Having Microcapsules Adhering Thereto’, US Patent 5,232,769; 1993 LINK https://doi.org/10.1177/1528083705049050
- 34.
C. X. Wang and Sh. L. Chen, J. Ind. Text., 2005, 34, (3), 157
- 35.
D. Koenig, M. S. Brunner, D. Hoffman, W. R. Joseph, D. C. Musil, M. A. Daley, A. E. Wright, J. D. Amundson, P. B. Argo, D. G. Krzysik, D. J. Drath, W. A. Hendrikson, H. A. Lafleur III, C. J. Rueb, Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc, USA, ‘Cleansing Composition Including Microencapsulated Delivery Vehicles’, World Appl . 2007/075211 LINK https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm_00000247
- 36.
S. Y. Cheng, M. C. W. Yuen, C. W. Kan, K. K. L. Cheuk, C. H. Chui and K. H. Lam, Int. J. Mol. Med., 2009, 24, (4), 411
- 37.
C. Alonso, M. Martí, C. Barba, M. Lis, L. Rubio and L. Coderch, J. Photochem. Photobiol. B: Biol., 2016, 156, 50 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2016.01.014
- 38.
J. O. Fiedler, Ó. G. Carmona, C. G. Carmona, M. J. Lis, A. M. S. Plath, R. B. Samulewski and F. M. Bezerra, J. Text. Inst., 2020, 111, (1), 68 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2019.1625607
- 39.
V. A. Nierstrasz, ‘Textile-Based Drug Release Systems’, in “Smart Textiles for Medicine and Healthcare”, ed. L. Van Langenhove, Woodhead Publishing Series in Textiles, Elsevier, The Netherlands, 2007, pp. 50–73 LINK https://doi.org/10.1533/9781845692933.1.50
- 40.
N. S. Al-Waili, Complement. Ther. Med., 2003, 11, (4), 226 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0965-2299(03)00120-1
- 41.
E. Gans, S. Nacht and D. Yeung, Richardson-Vicks Inc, USA, ‘Topical Treatment of Skin Inflammatory Disorders’, US Patent 4,623,667; 1986 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00749.x
- 42.
A. Teichmann, U. Jacobi, E. Waibler, W. Sterry and J. Lademann, Contact Dermatitis, 2006, 54, (1), 5
- 43.
T. Borodina, D. Grigoriev, E. Markvicheva, H. Möhwald and D. Shchukin, Adv. Eng. Mater., 2011, 13, (3), B123 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.201080047
- 44.
H. Yu, M. S. Brewer, K. K. Leonas, J. A. Knopp and P. A. Annis, Text. Res. J., 2018, 88, (19), 2234 LINK https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517517718191
- 45.
M. E. Carlotti, S. Sapino, M. Trotta, L. Battaglia, D. Vione and E. Pelizzetti, J. Dispers. Sci. Technol., 2005, 26, (2), 125 LINK https://doi.org/10.1081/dis-200045403
- 46.
J. Milanovic, V. Manojlovic, S. Levic, N. Rajic, V. Nedovic and B. Bugarski, Sensors, 2010, 10, (1), 901 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/s100100901
- 47.
“Handbook of Encapsulation and Controlled Release”, 1st Edn., ed. M. Mishra, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2015 LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/b19038
- 48.
P. B. Deasy, “Microencapsulation and Related Drug Processes”, Marcel Dekker Inc, New York, USA, 1984
- 49.
S. Kheradmandnia, E. Vasheghani-Farahani, M. Nosrati and F. Atyabi, Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med., 2010, 6, (6), 753 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nano.2010.06.003
- 50.
I. G. Zigoneanu, C. E. Astete and C. M. Sabliov, Nanotechnology, 2008, 19, (10), 105606 LINK https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/19/10/105606
- 51.
C. Duclairoir, A. M. Orecchioni, P. Depraetere and E. Nakache, J. Microencapsul., 2002, 19, (1), 53 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/02652040110055207
- 52.
H. Knaggs, ‘Skin Aging in the Asian Population’, in “Skin Aging Handbook”, ed. N. Dayan, William Andrew Inc, Norwich, NY, USA, 2009, pp. 177–201 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-8155-1584-5.50013-2
- 53.
M. B. Oliveira, A. H. do Prado, J. Bernegossi, C. S. Sato, I. L. Brunetti, M. V. Scarpa, G. R. Leonardi, S. E. Friberg and M. Chorilli, Biomed Res. Int., 2014, 632570 LINK https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/632570
- 54.
C. H. Salamanca, A. Barrera-Ocampo, J. C. Lasso, N. Camacho and C. J. Yarce, Pharmaceutics, 2018, 10, (3), 148 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics10030148
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists (AATCC) Foundation Student Research Support Grant 2019. We would like to thank Rebecca Kirkland and her team (Department of Foods and Nutrition, University of Georgia, Athens) for helping us with the New Brunswick C24 incubator shaker in their laboratory.
Declaration of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.