Skip to content
1887
Volume 63, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2056-5135

Abstract

A catalyst support is often used to disperse a catalyst material to enhance the contact area for reaction. In catalytic converters, a coating called the catalyst layer contains both the catalyst support and catalytically active material. Given the role of the catalyst layer in catalytic converters, its mechanical strength is of great importance as it determines the service life of catalytic converters. This review paper therefore summarises a number of methods which are currently used in the literature to measure the strength of a catalyst layer. It was identified that the methods applied at present could be divided into two groups. All methods regardless of the group have been successfully used to investigate the effect of a range of formulation and process parameters on the strength of a catalyst layer. In terms of measurement principles, Group 1 methods measure the strength based on mass loss after the layer sample is subjected to a destructive environment of choice. Group 2 methods tend to give more direct measurements on the strength of bonding between particles in a catalyst layer. Therefore, strength data generated by Group 2 methods are more reproducible between different researchers as the results are less dependent on the testing environment. However, methods in both groups still suffer from the fact that they are not designed to separately measure the cohesive and the adhesive strength of a catalyst layer. Two new methods have been recently proposed to solve this problem; with these methods, the cohesive and adhesive strength of a catalyst layer can be measured separately.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651319X15475632460410
2019-01-01
2024-06-25
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/63/3/Jiankai_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651319X15475632460410&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Kuhn T. S. Philos. Sci., 1982, (2), 669 LINK https://doi.org/10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1982.2.192452 [Google Scholar]
  2. Berger A., Hatling O., and Rodriguez-Ortiz D. ‘Three Way Catalytic Converter: Background – Catcon’, University of California, Berkley, USA, 2009 LINK http://www.cchem.berkeley.edu/molsim/teaching/fall2009/catalytic_converter/bkgcatcon.html [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang J., Holt E. M., Blanco-García P., Wagland A., Hounslow M. J., and Salman A. D. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2016, 110, 108 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2016.02.024 [Google Scholar]
  4. Yang J., Holt E. M., Huang K., Blanco-García P., Wagland A., Hounslow M. J., and Salman A. D. Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 2018, 132, 1117 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cherd.2018.01.052 [Google Scholar]
  5. Yang J., Blanco-García P., Holt E. M., Wagland A., Huang K., and Salman A. D. Powder Technol., 2018, 340, 465 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.044 [Google Scholar]
  6. Agrafiotis C., and Tsetsekou A. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2000, 20, (7), 815 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0955-2219(99)00218-6 [Google Scholar]
  7. Jia L., Shen M., and Wang J. Surf. Coatings Technol., 2007, 201, (16–17), 7159 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2007.01.023 [Google Scholar]
  8. Giani L., Cristiani C., Groppi G., and Tronconi E. Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 2006, 62, (1–2), 121 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2005.07.003 [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang J. ‘Measuring Adhesion between Particles’, PhD Thesis, Chemical and Biological Engineering, University of Sheffield, UK, 16th October, 2018 LINK http://etheses.whiterose.ac.uk/id/eprint/21276 [Google Scholar]
  10. Avila P., Montes M., and Miró E. E. Chem. Eng. J., 2005, 109, (1–3), 11 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2005.02.025 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bennett R. B., and Niesz D. E. ‘Effect of Surface Chemical Reactions During Wet Milling of Alumina’, Technical Report No. 3, Contract Number N00014–68–C–0342 NR 032–511, Presented at 74th Annual Meeting of the American Ceramic Society, Washington, USA, 9th May, 1972, Battelle, Columbus, USA, October, 1972, 28 pp LINK https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/750399.pdf [Google Scholar]
  12. Nijhuis T. A., Beers A. E. W., Vergunst T., Hoek I., Kapteijn F., and Moulijn J. A. Catal. Rev.: Sci. Eng., 2001, 43, (4), 345 LINK https://doi.org/10.1081/cr-120001807 [Google Scholar]
  13. Agrafiotis C., and Tsetsekou A. J. Mater. Sci., 2000, 35, (4), 951 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1004762827623 [Google Scholar]
  14. Agrafiotis C., and Tsetsekou A. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 2000, 20, (7), 825 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0955-2219(99)00231-9 [Google Scholar]
  15. Adegbite S. A. ‘Coating of Catalyst Supports: Links Between Slurry Characteristics, Coating Process and Final Coating Quality’, PhD Thesis, School of Chemical Engineering, University of Birmingham, UK, June, 2010, 264 pp LINK http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/920/ [Google Scholar]
  16. Cybulski A., and Moulijn J. A. “Structured Catalysts and Reactors”, 2nd Edn., Taylor and Francis Group LLC, Boca Raton, USA, 2005, 856 pp LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420028003 [Google Scholar]
  17. Boix A. V., Zamaro J. M., Lombardo E. A., and Miró E. E. Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 2003, 46, (1), 121 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-3373(03)00216-9 [Google Scholar]
  18. Housecroft C. E., and Constable E. C. “Chemistry: An Introduction to Organic, Inorganic and Physical Chemistry”, 2nd Edn., Prentice Hall, New York, USA, 2002, 1184 pp [Google Scholar]
  19. Zhao S., Zhang J., Weng D., and Wu X. Surf. Coatings Technol., 2003, 167, (1), 97 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0257-8972(02)00859-9 [Google Scholar]
  20. Valentini M., Groppi G., Cristiani C., Levi M., Tronconi E., and Forzatti P. Catal. Today, 2001, 69, (1–4), 307 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(01)00383-2 [Google Scholar]
  21. Sun H., Quan X., Chen S., Zhao H., and Zhao Y. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2007, 253, (6), 3303 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2006.07.044 [Google Scholar]
  22. Germani G., Stefanescu A., Schuurman Y., and van Veen A. C. Chem. Eng. Sci., 2007, 62, (18–20), 5084 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.02.034 [Google Scholar]
  23. Jia J., Zhou J., Zhang J., Yuan Z., and Wang S. Appl. Surf. Sci., 2007, 253, (23), 9099 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2007.05.034 [Google Scholar]
  24. Jiang P., Lu G., Guo Y., Guo Y., Zhang S., and Wang X. Surf. Coatings Technol., 2005, 190, (2–3), 314 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2004.05.029 [Google Scholar]
  25. Agrafiotis C., Tsetsekou A., and Ekonomakou A. J. Mater. Sci. Lett., 1999, 18, (17), 1421 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1006675524692 [Google Scholar]
  26. Ruhi G., Modi O. P., Singh I. B., Jha A. K., and Yegneswaran A. H. Surf. Coatings Technol., 2006, 201, (3–4), 1866 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2006.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  27. Roth T., Kloos K. H., and Broszeit E. Thin Solid Films, 1987, 153, (1–3), 123 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-6090(87)90176-3 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1595/205651319X15475632460410
Loading
/content/journals/10.1595/205651319X15475632460410
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error