Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 64, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 64, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Antibacterial resistant bacteria are a significant problem in the hide or skin soaking process due to their destructive properties on finished leather. Lichens may be a solution to overcome this resistance problem. (99.86%) was isolated from soak liquor samples. For screening of possible antibacterial effects of lichen acetone extracts, six lichen species ( and sp.) were examined by nine-fold dilution against and extracts showed antibacterial effects at the concentrations of 240 μg ml−1, 120 μg ml−1 and 60 μg ml−1 whereas the extracts of had an antibacterial effect at 240 μg ml−1 and 120 μg ml−1. On the other hand, had no antibacterial effect. The most successful lichen extract was determined to be sp. at the concentrations of 240 μg ml−1, 120 μg ml−1, 60 μg ml−1, 30 μg ml−1 and 15 μg ml−1. In conclusion, lichen extracts seem to have potential antibacterial efficacies against

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
2020-01-01
2024-05-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/64/4/Berber_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Dahl S. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1956, 51, 103 [Google Scholar]
  2. Solaiman D., Ashby R., Birbir M., and Caglayan P. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2016, 111, (10), 358 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3644 [Google Scholar]
  3. Birbir M., and Ilgaz A. J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 1996, 80, (5), 147 [Google Scholar]
  4. Birbir Y., Dolek N., Birbir M., and Caglayan P. Rom. Biotechnol. Lett., 2015, 20, (1), 10123 LINK https://e-repository.org/rbl/vol.20/iss.1/12.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. Rangarajan R., Didato T. D., and Bryant S. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2003, 98, (12), 477 [Google Scholar]
  6. Orlita A. Int. Biodet. Biodeg., 2004, 53, (3), 157 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00089-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. Birbir M., Birbir Y., Yilmaz E., and Caglayan P. Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinform., 2016, 6, (4), 121 LINK https://doi.org/10.17706/ijbbb.2016.6.4.121-129 [Google Scholar]
  8. Wu J., Zhao L., Liu X., Chen W., and Gu H. J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 148, 158 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.113 [Google Scholar]
  9. Berber D., and Birbir M. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2010, 105, (10), 320 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3224 [Google Scholar]
  10. Veyselova C., Birbir M., and Berber D. J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2013, 97, (4), 166 [Google Scholar]
  11. Caglayan P., Birbir M., Sánchez-Porro C., Ventosa A., and Birbir Y. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2018, 113, (2), 41 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3790 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bailey D. G., and Birbir M. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1993, 88, 285 [Google Scholar]
  13. Anderson H. J. Soc. Leather Trade. Chem., 1949, 33, 250 [Google Scholar]
  14. Haines B. M. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1984, 79, (8), 319 [Google Scholar]
  15. Tancous J. J., Roddy W. T., and O’Flaherty F. “Skin, Hide and Leather Defects”,The Western Hills Publishing Company, Ohio, USA, 1959 [Google Scholar]
  16. ‘Antibiotic Resistance’, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 31st July, 2020 LINK https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance [Google Scholar]
  17. Birbir M., Ulusoy K., and Caglayan P. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2016, 111, (9), 334 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3704 [Google Scholar]
  18. Birbir Y., Uğur G., and Birbir M. J. Electrostat., 2008, 66, (7–8), 355 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2008.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. Berber D., Birbir M., and Hacioglu H. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2010, 105, (11), 354 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3229 [Google Scholar]
  20. Birbir M., Yazici E., and Çağlayan P. J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2019, 103, 6 [Google Scholar]
  21. Türkan M. F., Aslan A., Yapıcı A. N., Meriçli Yapıcı B., and Bilgi S. T. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 2013, 23, (2), 176 LINK https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tekstilvekonfeksiyon/issue/23820/253769 [Google Scholar]
  22. Nash T. H. III “Lichen Biology”, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008, p. 303 LINK https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790478 [Google Scholar]
  23. Molnár K., and Farkas E. Z. Naturforsch. C., 2010, 65, (3–4), 157 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2010-3-401 [Google Scholar]
  24. Paudel B., Bhattarai H. D., Lee J. S., Hong S. G., Shin H. W., and Yim J. H. Phytother. Res., 2008, 22, (9), 1269 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2445 [Google Scholar]
  25. Çobanoğlu G., Sesal C., Gökmen B., and Çakar S. South West. J. Hortic. Biol. Environ., 2010, 1, (2), 153 LINK http://biozoojournals.ro/swjhbe/v1n2/05.swjhbe.v1n2.Cobanoglu.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. Çobanoğlu G., Sesal C., Açıkgöz B., and Karaltı İ. Mod. Phytomorphol., 2016, 10, 19 LINK https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155349 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gökalsın B., Berber D., Özyiğitoğlu G. Ç., Yeşilada E., and Sesal N. C. Plant Biosyst., 2019 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2019.1701117 [Google Scholar]
  28. Berber D. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2020, 115, (3), 96 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/1627 [Google Scholar]
  29. Caglayan P., Birbir M., Sánchez-Porro C., and Ventosa A. Turk. J. Biochem., 2018, 43, (3), 312 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2017-0127 [Google Scholar]
  30. Caglayan P., Birbir M., Sánchez-Porro C., and Ventosa A. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2017, 112, (6), 207 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3763 [Google Scholar]
  31. McLaughlin G. D., and Highberger J. H. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1926, 21, 280 [Google Scholar]
  32. Birbir M. J. Turk. Microbiol. Soc., 1997, 27, 68 [Google Scholar]
  33. Bitlisli B. O., Karavana H. A., Basaran B., Sarı O., Yasa I., and Birbir M. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2004, 99, (12), 494 [Google Scholar]
  34. Aslan E., and Birbir M. J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2011, 106, (12), 372 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3303 [Google Scholar]
  35. Fluckey W. M., Loneragan G. H., Warner R. D., Echeverry A., and Brashears M. M. J. Food Protect., 2009, 72, (4), 766 LINK https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.4.766 [Google Scholar]
  36. Shepard B. D., and Gilmore M. S. Microb. Infect., 2002, 4, (2), 215 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01530-1 [Google Scholar]
  37. Amaral D. M. F., Silva L. F., Casarotti S. N., Nascimento L. C. S., and Penna A. L. B. J. Dairy Sci., 2017, 100, (2), 933 LINK https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11513 [Google Scholar]
  38. Frazzon A. P. G., Gama B. A., Hermes V., Bierhals C. G., Pereira R. I., Guedes A. G., d’Azevedo P. A., and Frazzon J. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2010, 26, (2), 365 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0160-x [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
Loading
Antibacterial Potential of Six Lichen Species against Enterococcus durans from Leather Industry
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 64, 480 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error