Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 64, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 64, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

  • oa Antibacterial Potential of Six Lichen Species against from Leather Industry

    Evaluation of acetone extracts obtained from several lichen species as alternative natural antibacterial agents

  • Authors: Didem Berber1,2, İpek Türkmenoğlu3 and Nüzhet Cenk Sesal4
  • Affiliations: 1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Marmara UniversityIstanbul, Turkey 2 Gastronomy and Culinary Arts Department, Faculty of Fine Arts, Maltepe University, Marmara Eğitim KöyüIstanbul, Turkey 3 Biology Department, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Marmara UniversityIstanbul, Turkey 4 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Marmara UniversityIstanbul, Turkey
  • Source: Johnson Matthey Technology Review, Volume 64, Issue 4, Oct 2020, p. 480 - 488
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
    • Published online: 01 Jan 2020

Abstract

Antibacterial resistant bacteria are a significant problem in the hide or skin soaking process due to their destructive properties on finished leather. Lichens may be a solution to overcome this resistance problem. (99.86%) was isolated from soak liquor samples. For screening of possible antibacterial effects of lichen acetone extracts, six lichen species ( and sp.) were examined by nine-fold dilution against and extracts showed antibacterial effects at the concentrations of 240 μg ml−1, 120 μg ml−1 and 60 μg ml−1 whereas the extracts of had an antibacterial effect at 240 μg ml−1 and 120 μg ml−1. On the other hand, had no antibacterial effect. The most successful lichen extract was determined to be sp. at the concentrations of 240 μg ml−1, 120 μg ml−1, 60 μg ml−1, 30 μg ml−1 and 15 μg ml−1. In conclusion, lichen extracts seem to have potential antibacterial efficacies against

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
2020-01-01
2024-12-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/64/4/Berber_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. S. Dahl, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1956, 51, 103 [Google Scholar]
  2. D. Solaiman, R. Ashby, M. Birbir, P. Caglayan, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2016, 111, (10), 358 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3644 [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Birbir, A. Ilgaz, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 1996, 80, (5), 147 [Google Scholar]
  4. Y. Birbir, N. Dolek, M. Birbir, P. Caglayan, Rom. Biotechnol. Lett., 2015, 20, (1), 10123 LINK https://e-repository.org/rbl/vol.20/iss.1/12.pdf [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Rangarajan, T. D. Didato, S. Bryant, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2003, 98, (12), 477 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Orlita, Int. Biodet. Biodeg., 2004, 53, (3), 157 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/S0964-8305(03)00089-1 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Birbir, Y. Birbir, E. Yilmaz, P. Caglayan, Int. J. Biosci. Biochem. Bioinform., 2016, 6, (4), 121 LINK https://doi.org/10.17706/ijbbb.2016.6.4.121-129 [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Wu, L. Zhao, X. Liu, W. Chen, H. Gu, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 148, 158 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.113 [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Berber, M. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2010, 105, (10), 320 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3224 [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Veyselova, M. Birbir, D. Berber, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2013, 97, (4), 166 [Google Scholar]
  11. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, Y. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2018, 113, (2), 41 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3790 [Google Scholar]
  12. D. G. Bailey, M. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1993, 88, 285 [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Anderson, J. Soc. Leather Trade. Chem., 1949, 33, 250 [Google Scholar]
  14. B. M. Haines, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1984, 79, (8), 319 [Google Scholar]
  15. J. J. Tancous, W. T. Roddy, F. O’Flaherty, “Skin, Hide and Leather Defects”,The Western Hills Publishing Company, Ohio, USA, 1959 [Google Scholar]
  16. ‘Antibiotic Resistance’, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland, 31st July, 2020 LINK https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/antibiotic-resistance [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Birbir, K. Ulusoy, P. Caglayan, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2016, 111, (9), 334 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3704 [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Birbir, G. Uğur, M. Birbir, J. Electrostat., 2008, 66, (7–8), 355 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2008.03.002 [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Berber, M. Birbir, H. Hacioglu, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2010, 105, (11), 354 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3229 [Google Scholar]
  20. M. Birbir, E. Yazici, P. Çağlayan, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2019, 103, 6 [Google Scholar]
  21. M. F. Türkan, A. Aslan, A. N. Yapıcı, B. Meriçli Yapıcı, S. T. Bilgi, Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon, 2013, 23, (2), 176 LINK https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tekstilvekonfeksiyon/issue/23820/253769 [Google Scholar]
  22. T. H. Nash III, “Lichen Biology”, 2nd Edn., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 2008, p. 303 LINK https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790478 [Google Scholar]
  23. K. Molnár, E. Farkas, Z. Naturforsch. C., 2010, 65, (3–4), 157 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-2010-3-401 [Google Scholar]
  24. B. Paudel, H. D. Bhattarai, J. S. Lee, S. G. Hong, H. W. Shin, J. H. Yim, Phytother. Res., 2008, 22, (9), 1269 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/ptr.2445 [Google Scholar]
  25. G. Çobanoğlu, C. Sesal, B. Gökmen, S. Çakar, South West. J. Hortic. Biol. Environ., 2010, 1, (2), 153 LINK http://biozoojournals.ro/swjhbe/v1n2/05.swjhbe.v1n2.Cobanoglu.pdf [Google Scholar]
  26. G. Çobanoğlu, C. Sesal, B. Açıkgöz, İ. Karaltı, Mod. Phytomorphol., 2016, 10, 19 LINK https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.155349 [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Gökalsın, D. Berber, G. Ç. Özyiğitoğlu, E. Yeşilada, N. C. Sesal, Plant Biosyst., 2019 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2019.1701117 [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Berber, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2020, 115, (3), 96 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/1627 [Google Scholar]
  29. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, Turk. J. Biochem., 2018, 43, (3), 312 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2017-0127 [Google Scholar]
  30. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2017, 112, (6), 207 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3763 [Google Scholar]
  31. G. D. McLaughlin, J. H. Highberger, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1926, 21, 280 [Google Scholar]
  32. M. Birbir, J. Turk. Microbiol. Soc., 1997, 27, 68 [Google Scholar]
  33. B. O. Bitlisli, H. A. Karavana, B. Basaran, O. Sarı, I. Yasa, M. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2004, 99, (12), 494 [Google Scholar]
  34. E. Aslan, M. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2011, 106, (12), 372 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3303 [Google Scholar]
  35. W. M. Fluckey, G. H. Loneragan, R. D. Warner, A. Echeverry, M. M. Brashears, J. Food Protect., 2009, 72, (4), 766 LINK https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-72.4.766 [Google Scholar]
  36. B. D. Shepard, M. S. Gilmore, Microb. Infect., 2002, 4, (2), 215 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/S1286-4579(01)01530-1 [Google Scholar]
  37. D. M. F. Amaral, L. F. Silva, S. N. Casarotti, L. C. S. Nascimento, A. L. B. Penna, J. Dairy Sci., 2017, 100, (2), 933 LINK https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2016-11513 [Google Scholar]
  38. A. P. G. Frazzon, B. A. Gama, V. Hermes, C. G. Bierhals, R. I. Pereira, A. G. Guedes, P. A. d’Azevedo, J. Frazzon, World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2010, 26, (2), 365 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-009-0160-x [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
Loading
Antibacterial Potential of Six Lichen Species against Enterococcus durans from Leather Industry
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 64, 480 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
/content/journals/10.1595/205651320X15942856494595
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test