Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 68, Issue 4
  5. Article
Volume 68, Issue 4
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

Heterogeneous Cu/ZnO-based catalysts are widely used for CO hydrogenation to methanol, but limitations remain for industrial applications. These include achieving high methanol selectivity and conversion and mitigating deactivation by water poisoning. Part I of this review explores the role of active sites on Cu/ZnO-based catalysts in CO conversion. The synergistic interaction between copper and zinc oxide is emphasised, particularly regarding interfacial effects on carbon monoxide activation and formate formation. The discussion covers theoretical and experimental perspectives on active site characteristics, including defects, vacancies, steps and strain. Additionally, the review explores the connection between Cu/ZnO-based catalysts properties and methanol synthesis activity.

© 2024 Johnson Matthey
This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Conflicts of Interests: Author declares no conflict of interest.
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651324X17104276393919
2024-10-01
2024-09-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/68/4/Alsalmi4_16b_Imp_Pt1.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651324X17104276393919&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. A. Mikhaylov, , N. Moiseev, , K. Aleshin, , T. Burkhardt, , Entrep. Sustain. Issues, 2020, 7, (4), 2897 LINK https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.7.4(21)
    [Google Scholar]
  2. H.-K. Lo, , C. Copéret, , ChemCatChem, 2018, 11, (1), 430 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201801368
    [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Al-Ghussain, , Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy, 2018, 38, (1), 13 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13041
    [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Garcia-Cuerva, , E. Z. Berglund, , A. R. Binder, , Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 2016, 113, 106 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.06.006
    [Google Scholar]
  5. P. Friedlingstein, , M. W. Jones, , M. O’Sullivan, , R. M. Andrew, , J. Hauck, , G. P. Peters, , W. Peters, , J. Pongratz, , S. Sitch, , C. Le Quéré, , D. C. E. Bakker, , J. G. Canadell, , P. Ciais, , R. B. Jackson, , P. Anthoni, , L. Barbero, , A. Bastos, , V. Bastrikov, , M. Becker, , L. Bopp, , E. Buitenhuis, , N. Chandra, , F. Chevallier, , L. P. Chini, , K. I. Currie, , R. A. Feely, , M. Gehlen, , D. Gilfillan, , T. Gkritzalis, , D. S. Goll, , N. Gruber, , S. Gutekunst, , I. Harris, , V. Haverd, , R. A. Houghton, , G. Hurtt, , T. Ilyina, , A. K. Jain, , E. Joetzjer, , J. O. Kaplan, , E. Kato, , K. Klein Goldewijk, , J. I. Korsbakken, , P. Landschützer, , S. K. Lauvset, , N. Lefèvre, , A. Lenton, , S. Lienert, , D. Lombardozzi, , G. Marland, , P. C. McGuire, , J. R. Melton, , N. Metzl, , D. R. Munro, , J. E. M. S. Nabel, , S.-I. Nakaoka, , C. Neill, , A. M. Omar, , T. Ono, , A. Peregon, , D. Pierrot, , B. Poulter, , G. Rehder, , L. Resplandy, , E. Robertson, , C. Rödenbeck, , R. Séférian, , J. Schwinger, , N. Smith, , P. P. Tans, , H. Tian, , B. Tilbrook, , F. N. Tubiello, , G. R. van der Werf, , A. J. Wiltshire, , S. Zaehle, , Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 2019, 11, (4), 1783 LINK https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-11-1783-2019
    [Google Scholar]
  6. K. B. Karnauskas, , S. L. Miller, , A. C. Schapiro, , GeoHealth, 2020, 4, (5), e2019GH000237 LINK https://doi.org/10.1029/2019GH000237
    [Google Scholar]
  7. J. H. Edwards, , Catal. Today, 1995, 23, (1), 59 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(94)00081-c
    [Google Scholar]
  8. M. K. Sanghvi, , R. R. Judkins, , W. Fulkerson, , Sci. Am., 1990, 263, (3), 128 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0990-128
    [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Sheldon, , Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2017, 61, (3), 172 LINK https://doi.org/10.1595/205651317x695622
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Z. Arab Aboosadi, , A. H. Jahanmiri, , M. R. Rahimpour, , Appl. Energy, 2011, 88, (8), 2691 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.017
    [Google Scholar]
  11. G. H. Graaf, , J. G. M. Winkelman, , Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2016, 55, (20), 5854 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b00815
    [Google Scholar]
  12. P. Potočnik, , I. Grabec, , M. Šetinc, , J. Levec, , Neural Process. Lett., 2000, 11, (3), 219 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009615710515
    [Google Scholar]
  13. J. G. van Bennekom, , R. H. Venderbosch, , J. G. M. Winkelman, , E. Wilbers, , D. Assink, , K. P. J. Lemmens, , H. J. Heeres, , Chem. Eng. Sci., 2013, 87, 204 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2012.10.013
    [Google Scholar]
  14. A. Hamnett, , Catal. Today, 1997, 38, (4), 445 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0920-5861(97)00054-0
    [Google Scholar]
  15. M. D. Porosoff, , B. Yan, , J. G. Chen, , Energy Environ. Sci., 2016, 9, (1), 62 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee02657a
    [Google Scholar]
  16. C. Murkin, , J. Brightling, , Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2016, 60, (4), 263 LINK https://doi.org/10.1595/205651316x692923
    [Google Scholar]
  17. U. J. Etim, , Y. Song, , Z. Zhong, , Front. Energy Res., 2020, 8, 545431 LINK https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2020.545431
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Y. Li, , S. H. Chan, , Q. Sun, , Nanoscale, 2015, 7, (19), 8663 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/c5nr00092k
    [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Kattel, , B. Yan, , Y. Yang, , J. G. Chen, , P. Liu, , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2016, 138, (38), 12440 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b05791
    [Google Scholar]
  20. T. Kubota, , I. Hayakawa, , H. Mabuse, , K. Mori, , K. Ushikoshi, , T. Watanabe, , M. Saito, , Appl. Organomet. Chem., 2001, 15, (2), 121 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0739(200102)15:2<121::aid-aoc106>3.0.co;2-3
    [Google Scholar]
  21. F. Nestler, , A. R. Schütze, , M. Ouda, , M. J. Hadrich, , A. Schaadt, , S. Bajohr, , T. Kolb, , Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 394, 124881 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124881
    [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Wang, , M. Ghoussoub, , H. Wang, , Y. Shao, , W. Sun, , A. A. Tountas, , T. E. Wood, , H. Li, , J. Y. Y. Loh, , Y. Dong, , M. Xia, , Y. Li, , S. Wang, , J. Jia, , C. Qiu, , C. Qian, , N. P. Kherani, , L. He, , X. Zhang, , G. A. Ozin, , Joule, 2018, 2, (7), 1369 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.03.007
    [Google Scholar]
  23. S. Kyrimis, , M. E. Potter, , R. Raja, , L.-M. Armstrong, , Faraday Discuss., 2021, 230, 100 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/d0fd00136h
    [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Kuczynski, , W. I. Browne, , H. J. Fontein, , K. R. Westerterp, , Chem. Eng. Process. Process Intensif., 1987, 21, (4), 179 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0255-2701(87)80015-6
    [Google Scholar]
  25. M. Aresta, , A. Dibenedetto, , Dalton Trans., 2007, (28), 2975 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/b700658f
    [Google Scholar]
  26. O. Mäyrä, , K. Leiviskä, , ‘Modeling in Methanol Synthesis’, in “Methanol: Science and Engineering”, eds. A. Basile, , F. Dalena, , Ch. 17, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018, pp. 475–492 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-444-63903-5.00017-0
    [Google Scholar]
  27. S. C. Kang, , K.-W. Jun, , Y.-J. Lee, , Energy Fuels, 2013, 27, (11), 6377 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/ef401177k
    [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Yoshihara, , C. T. Campbell, , J. Catal., 1996, 161, (2), 776 LINK https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1996.0240
    [Google Scholar]
  29. F. Studt, , I. Sharafutdinov, , F. Abild-Pedersen, , C. F. Elkjær, , J. S. Hummelshøj, , S. Dahl, , I. Chorkendorff, , J. K. Nørskov, , Nat. Chem., 2014, 6, (4), 320 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1873
    [Google Scholar]
  30. S. Kattel, , P. J. Ramírez, , J. G. Chen, , J. A. Rodriguez, , P. Liu, , Science, 2017, 355, (6331), 1296 LINK https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal3573
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Y.-F. Zhao, , Y. Yang, , C. Mims, , C. H. F. Peden, , J. Li, , D. Mei, , J. Catal., 2011, 281, (2), 199 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2011.04.012
    [Google Scholar]
  32. F. Liao, , Y. Huang, , J. Ge, , W. Zheng, , K. Tedsree, , P. Collier, , X. Hong, , S. C. Tsang, , Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, (9), 2162 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201007108
    [Google Scholar]
  33. J. Abu-Dahrieh, , D. Rooney, , A. Goguet, , Y. Saih, , Chem. Eng. J., 2012, 203, 201 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.07.011
    [Google Scholar]
  34. A. Bansode, , A. Urakawa, , J. Catal., 2014, 309, 66 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2013.09.005
    [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Urakawa, , A. Bansode, , R. V. Gaikwad, , ‘Methanol Production Process’, World Patent Appl. 2017/140800, 24th August, 2017
     [Google Scholar]
  36. M. M. Günter, , T. Ressler, , B. Bems, , C. Büscher, , T. Genger, , O. Hinrichsen, , M. Muhler, , R. Schlögl, , Catal. Lett., 2001, 71, (1/2), 37 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1016696022840
    [Google Scholar]
  37. T. Shishido, , Y. Yamamoto, , H. Morioka, , K. Takaki, , K. Takehira, , Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2004, 263, (2), 249 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2003.12.018
    [Google Scholar]
  38. T. I. Barry, , R. Roberts, , Nature, 1959, 184, (4692), 1061 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/1841061a0
    [Google Scholar]
  39. P. Davies, , F. F. Snowdon, , G. W. Bridger, , D. O. Hughes, , P. W. Young, , ICI Ltd, ‘Water-Gas Conversion and Catalysts Therefor’, British Patent 1,010,871, 24th November, 1965
     [Google Scholar]
  40. H. Yang, , P. Gao, , C. Zhang, , L. Zhong, , X. Li, , S. Wang, , H. Wang, , W. Wei, , Y. Sun, , Catal. Commun., 2016, 84, 56 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2016.06.010
    [Google Scholar]
  41. K. K. Bando, , K. Sayama, , H. Kusama, , K. Okabe, , H. Arakawa, , Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 1997, 165, (1–2), 391 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(97)00221-4
    [Google Scholar]
  42. N. J. van Eck, , L. Waltman, , Scientometrics, 2010, 84, (2), 523 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
    [Google Scholar]
  43. L. C. Grabow, , M. Mavrikakis, , ACS Catal., 2011, 1, (4), 365 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/cs200055d
    [Google Scholar]
  44. M. Behrens, , F. Studt, , I. Kasatkin, , S. Kühl, , M. Hävecker, , F. Abild-Pedersen, , S. Zander, , F. Girgsdies, , P. Kurr, , B.-L. Kniep, , M. Tovar, , R. W. Fischer, , J. K. Nørskov, , R. Schlögl, , Science, 2012, 336, (6083), 893 LINK https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1219831
    [Google Scholar]
  45. M. Behrens, , S. Zander, , P. Kurr, , N. Jacobsen, , J. Senker, , G. Koch, , T. Ressler, , R. W. Fischer, , R. Schlögl, , J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2013, 135, (16), 6061 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/ja310456f
    [Google Scholar]
  46. J. Schumann, , T. Lunkenbein, , A. Tarasov, , N. Thomas, , R. Schlögl, , M. Behrens, , ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, (10), 2889 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201402278
    [Google Scholar]
  47. E. Frei, , A. Schaadt, , T. Ludwig, , H. Hillebrecht, , I. Krossing, , ChemCatChem, 2014, 6, (6), 1721 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201300665
    [Google Scholar]
  48. M. Kurtz, , N. Bauer, , C. Büscher, , H. Wilmer, , O. Hinrichsen, , R. Becker, , S. Rabe, , K. Merz, , M. Driess, , R. A. Fischer, , M. Muhler, , Catal. Lett., 2004, 92, (1/2), 49 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/b:catl.0000011085.88267.a6
    [Google Scholar]
  49. J. Xiao, , T. Frauenheim, , J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2012, 3, (18), 2638 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jz301119k
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Y. Choi, , K. Futagami, , T. Fujitani, , J. Nakamura, , Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2001, 208, (1–2), 163 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(00)00712-2
    [Google Scholar]
  51. M. Spencer, , Top. Catal., 1999, 8, 259 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019181715731
    [Google Scholar]
  52. J. Wang, , S. Funk, , U. Burghaus, , Catal. Lett., 2005, 103, (3–4), 219 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-005-7157-3
    [Google Scholar]
  53. S. Fujita, , M. Usui, , H. Ito, , N. Takezawa, , J. Catal., 1995, 157, (2), 403 LINK https://doi.org/10.1006/jcat.1995.1306
    [Google Scholar]
  54. G. J. J. Bartley, , R. Burch, , Appl. Catal., 1988, 43, (1), 141 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-9834(00)80907-0
    [Google Scholar]
  55. R. Burch, , R. J. Chappell, , S. E. Golunski, , Catal. Lett., 1988, 1, (12), 439 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00766204
    [Google Scholar]
  56. C. Yang, , Z. Ma, , N. Zhao, , W. Wei, , T. Hu, , Y. Sun, , Catal. Today, 2006, 115, (1–4), 222 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2006.02.077
    [Google Scholar]
  57. V. D. B. C. Dasireddy, , N. S. Štefančič, , B. Likozar, , J. CO2 Util., 2018, 28, 189 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2018.09.002
    [Google Scholar]
  58. W. X. Pan, , R. Cao, , D. L. Roberts, , G. L. Griffin, , J. Catal., 1988, 114, (2), 440 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(88)90047-4
    [Google Scholar]
  59. S. Natesakhawat, , J. W. Lekse, , J. P. Baltrus, , P. R. Ohodnicki, , B. H. Howard, , X. Deng, , C. Matranga, , ACS Catal., 2012, 2, (8), 1667 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/cs300008g
    [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Saito, , T. Fujitani, , M. Takeuchi, , T. Watanabe, , Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 1996, 138, (2), 311 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0926-860x(95)00305-3
    [Google Scholar]
  61. K. Klier, , Adv. Catal., 1982, 31, 243 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0360-0564(08)60455-1
    [Google Scholar]
  62. G. C. Chinchen, , P. J. Denny, , D. G. Parker, , M. S. Spencer, , D. A. Whan, , Appl. Catal., 1987, 30, (2), 333 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-9834(00)84123-8
    [Google Scholar]
  63. R. Burch, , S. E. Golunski, , M. S. Spencer, , J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans., 1990, 86, (15), 2683 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/ft9908602683
    [Google Scholar]
  64. I. Nakamura, , H. Nakano, , T. Fujitani, , T. Uchijima, , J. Nakamura, , J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 1999, 17, (4), 1592 LINK https://doi.org/10.1116/1.581856
    [Google Scholar]
  65. J. Niu, , H. Liu, , Y. Jin, , B. Fan, , W. Qi, , J. Ran, , Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2022, 47, (15), 9183 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.01.021
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Q. Chen, , X. Chen, , Q. Ke, , Colloid. Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 2022, 638, 128332 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.128332
    [Google Scholar]
  67. F. H. P. M. Habraken, , G. A. Bootsma, , P. Hofmann, , S. Hachicha, , A. M. Bradshaw, , Surf. Sci., 1979, 88, (2–3), 285 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(79)90076-1
    [Google Scholar]
  68. A. Chutia, , I. P. Silverwood, , M. R. Farrow, , D. O. Scanlon, , P. P. Wells, , M. Bowker, , S. F. Parker, , C. R. A. Catlow, , Surf. Sci., 2016, 653, 45 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susc.2016.05.002
    [Google Scholar]
  69. H.-J. Freund, , R. P. Messmer, , Surf. Sci., 1986, 172, (1), 1 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0039-6028(86)90580-7
    [Google Scholar]
  70. T. Fujitani, , J. Nakamura, , Catal. Lett., 1998, 56, 119 LINK https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019000927366
    [Google Scholar]
  71. T. Fujitani, , I. Nakamura, , T. Uchijima, , J. Nakamura, , Surf. Sci., 1997, 383, (2–3), 285 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0039-6028(97)00192-1
    [Google Scholar]
  72. M. Behrens, , D. Brennecke, , F. Girgsdies, , S. Kißner, , A. Trunschke, , N. Nasrudin, , S. Zakaria, , N. F. Idris, , S. B. A. Hamid, , B. Kniep, , R. Fischer, , W. Busser, , M. Muhler, , R. Schlögl, , Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2011, 392, (1–2), 93 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2010.10.031
    [Google Scholar]
  73. S. Poto, , D. V. van Berkel, , F. Gallucci, , M. F. N. d’Angelo, , Chem. Eng. J., 2022, 435, (2), 134946 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.134946
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Y. Slotboom, , M. J. Bos, , J. Pieper, , V. Vrieswijk, , B. Likozar, , S. R. A. Kersten, , D. W. F. Brilman, , Chem. Eng. J., 2020, 389, 124181 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.124181
    [Google Scholar]
  75. A. Pavlišič, , M. Huš, , A. Prašnikar, , B. Likozar, , J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 275, 122958 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122958
    [Google Scholar]
  76. S. Fujita, , M. Usui, , N. Takezawa, , J. Catal., 1992, 134, (1), 220 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(92)90223-5
    [Google Scholar]
  77. T. van Herwijnen, , W. A. de Jong, , J. Catal., 1980, 63, (1), 83 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(80)90061-5
    [Google Scholar]
  78. D. Grenoble, , M. M. Estadt, , D. F. Ollis, , J. Catal., 1981, 67, (1), 90 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9517(81)90263-3
    [Google Scholar]
  79. C.-S. Chen, , W.-H. Cheng, , S.-S. Lin, , Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 2003, 238, (1), 55 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/s0926-860x(02)00221-1
    [Google Scholar]
  80. M. Al Salmi, , Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2024, 68, (2), 184 LINK https://doi.org/10.1595/205651324x16980703569747
    [Google Scholar]
  81. J. Wellendorff, , K. T. Lundgaard, , A. Møgelhøj, , V. Petzold, , D. D. Landis, , J. K. Nørskov, , T. Bligaard, , K. W. Jacobsen, , Phys. Rev. B, 2012, 85, (23), 235149 LINK https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.85.235149
    [Google Scholar]
  82. B. Hammer, , L. B. Hansen, , J. K. Nørskov, , Phys. Rev. B, 1999, 59, (11), 7413 LINK https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.7413
    [Google Scholar]
  83. F. Studt, , F. Abild-Pedersen, , Q. Wu, , A. D. Jensen, , B. Temel, , J.-D. Grunwaldt, , J. K. Nørskov, , J. Catal., 2012, 293, 51 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2012.06.004
    [Google Scholar]
  84. L. Yang, , A. Karim, , J. T. Muckerman, , J. Phys. Chem. C, 2013, 117, (7), 3414 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/jp3114286
    [Google Scholar]
  85. A. A. Tsyganenko, , J. Lamotte, , J. Saussey, , J. C. Lavalley, , J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases, 1989, 85, (8), 2397 LINK https://doi.org/10.1039/f19898502397
    [Google Scholar]
  86. M. Huš, , D. Kopač, , B. Likozar, , ACS Catal., 2019, 9, (1), 105 LINK https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.8b03810
    [Google Scholar]
  87. M. Al Salmi, , Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2024, 68, (4), 477 LINK https://doi.org/10.1595/205651325X17176890228217
    [Google Scholar]
  88. M. Al Salmi, , Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2024, 68, (4), 490 LINK https://doi.org/10.1595/205651325X17176890228226
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1595/205651324X17104276393919
Loading
Active Sites of Cu/ZnO-Based Catalysts for CO2 Hydrogenation to Methanol: Part I
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 68, 465 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651324X17104276393919
/content/journals/10.1595/205651324X17104276393919
/content/journals/10.1595/205651324X17104276393919
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
Keyword(s): active sites; CO2 hydrogenation; Cu/ZnO catalysts; methanol; structure characterisation

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test