Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 65, Issue 3
  5. Article
Volume 65, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

Abstract

The steel industry is one of the most important industry sectors, but also one of the largest greenhouse gas emitters. The process gases produced in an integrated steel plant, blast furnace gas (BFG), basic oxygen furnace gas (BOFG) and coke oven gas (COG), are due to high shares of inert gas (nitrogen) in large part energy poor but also providing a potential carbon source (carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide) for the catalytic hydrogenation to methane by integration of a power-to-gas (P2G) plant. Furthermore, by interconnecting a biomass gasification, an additional biogenic hydrogen source is provided. Three possible implementation scenarios for a P2G and a biomass gasification plant, including mass and energy balances were analysed. The scenarios stipulate a direct conversion of BFG and BOFG resulting in high shares of nitrogen in the feed gas of the methanation. Laboratory experimental tests have shown that the methanation of BFG and BOFG is technically possible without prior separation of CO. The methane-rich product gas can be utilised in the steel plant and substitutes for natural gas (NG). The implementation of these renewable energy sources results in a significant reduction of CO emissions between 0.81 million tonnes CO and 4.6 million tonnes CO per year. However, the scenarios are significantly limited in terms of available electrolysis plant size, renewable electricity and biomass.

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16161444481140
2021-01-01
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/65/3/Medved_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16161444481140&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: A Roadmap for Moving to a Competitive Low Carbon Economy in 2050”,COM(2011) 112 Final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 8th March, 2011 LINK https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=celex%3A52011DC0112 [Google Scholar]
  2. “Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: The European Green Deal 2019”,COM(2019) 640 Final, European Commission, Brussels, Belgium, 11th December, 2019 LINK https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM%3A2019%3A640%3AFIN [Google Scholar]
  3. “Steel Statistical Yearbook 2019: Concise Version”,World Steel Association, Brussels, Belgium, November, 2019 LINK https://www.worldsteel.org/en/dam/jcr:7aa2a95d-448d-4c56-b62b-b2457f067cd9/SSY19%2520concise%2520version.pdf [Google Scholar]
  4. “In-Depth Analysis in Support of the Commission Communication COM(2018) 773: A Clean Planet for All: A European Long-Term Strategic Vision for a Prosperous, Modern, Competitive and Climate Neutral Economy”,European Commission Brussels, Belgium, 28th November, 2018 [Google Scholar]
  5. ‘The Future of Steelmaking: How the European Steel Industry can Achieve Carbon Neutrality”,Roland Berger GmbH, Munich, Germany, April, 2020 LINK https://www.rolandberger.com/publications/publication_pdf/rroland_berger_future_of_steelmaking.pdf [Google Scholar]
  6. Mac Dowell N., Fennell P. S., Shah N., and Maitland G. C. Nat. Clim. Change, 2017, 7, 243 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3231 [Google Scholar]
  7. Remus R., Aguado-Monsonet M. A., Roudier S., and Delgado Sancho L. “Best Available Techniques (BAT) Reference Document for Iron and Steel Production: Industrial Emissions Directive 2010/75/EU (Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control)”,European Union, Luxembourg, 2013 LINK https://doi.org/10.2791/98516 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brickett L. “DOE/NETL Carbon Capture Program: Carbon Dioxide Capture Handbook”,National Energy Technology Laboratory, Albany, OR, USA, August, 2015 LINK https://netl.doe.gov/sites/default/files/netl-file/Carbon-Dioxide-Capture-Handbook-2015.pdf [Google Scholar]
  9. Porzio G. F., Nastasi G., Colla V., Vannucci M., and Branca T. A. Appl. Energy, 2014, 136, 1085 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.06.086 [Google Scholar]
  10. Frey A., Goeke V., and Voss C. Chem. Ing. Techn., 2018, 90, (10), 1384 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800046 [Google Scholar]
  11. Uribe-Soto W., Portha J.-F., Commenge J.-M., and Falk L. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2017, 74, 809 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.03.008 [Google Scholar]
  12. The Carbon2Chem® Project, thyssenkrupp AG, Germany:https://www.thyssenkrupp.com/en/newsroom/content-page-162.html (Accessed on 21st May 2021)
  13. Thonemann N., Maga D., and Petermann C. Chem. Ing. Tech., 2018, 90, (10), 1576 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800025 [Google Scholar]
  14. Schlüter S., and Hennig T. Chem. Ing. Tech., 2018, 90, (10), 1541 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800021 [Google Scholar]
  15. Yildirim Ö., Nölker K., Büker K., and Kleinschmidt R. Chem. Ing. Tech., 2018, 90, (10), 1529 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800019 [Google Scholar]
  16. Stießel S., Berger A., Fernández Sanchis E. M., and Ziegmann M. Chem. Ing. Tech., 2018, 90, (10), 1392 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800030 [Google Scholar]
  17. i3-upgrade,Friedrich-Alexander University, Germany:https://www.i3upgrade.eu/ (Accessed on 9th January 2020)
  18. Wolf-Zöllner P., Krammer A., Medved A. R., Salbrechter K., and Lehner M. ‘Dynamic Methanation of By-product Gases from Integrated Steelworks’,International Conference on Polygeneration Strategies ICPS 2019,Vienna, Austria,18th–19th November, 2019 [Google Scholar]
  19. Rosenfeld D. C., Böhm H., Lindorfer J., and Lehner M. Renew. Energy, 2020, 147, (1), 1511 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.09.053 [Google Scholar]
  20. Müller S., Theiss L., Fleiß B., Hammerschmid M., Fuchs J., Penthor S., Rosenfeld D. C., Lehner M., and Hofbauer H. Biomass Conv. Bioref., 2021, 11, 159 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-01021-4 [Google Scholar]
  21. Hammerschmid M., Müller S., Fuchs J., and Hofbauer H. Biomass Conv. Bioref., 2021, 11, 169 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-020-00939-z [Google Scholar]
  22. Fuchs J., Schmid J. C., Müller S., and Hofbauer H Renew. Sust. Energy Rev., 2019, 107, 212 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.03.013 [Google Scholar]
  23. Hepburn C., Adlen E., Beddington J., Carter E. A., Fuss S., Mac Dowell N., Minx J. C., Smith P., and Williams C. K. Nature, 2019, 575, 87 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6 [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuchs J., Schmid J. C., Müller S., Mauerhofer A. M., Benedikt F., and Hofbauer H. Biomass Conv. Bioref., 2020, 10, 925 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s13399-019-00439-9 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kirchbacher F., Biegger P., Miltner M., Lehner M., and Harasek M. Energy, 2018, 146, 34 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.05.026 [Google Scholar]
  26. Medved A. R. ‘The Influence of Nitrogen on Catalytic Methanation’, Doctoral Thesis, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria, 2021 [Google Scholar]
  27. Rosenfeld D. C. ‘Generation and Application of Renewable Gases as Sustainable Energy Carrier for Industry and Mobility’, Doctoral Thesis, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria, 2020 [Google Scholar]
  28. ‘RenewableSteelGases: Einbindung erneuerbarer Energie in die Stahlproduktion zur Energieeffizienzsteigerung und Reduktion der CO2-Emissionen’,Publizierbarer Endbericht, Projektnummer: 858776, Montanuniversität Leoben, Austria, February, 2020 (in German) LINK https://energieforschung.at/projekt/einbindung-erneuerbarer-energie-in-die-stahlproduktion-zur-energieeffizienzsteigerung-und-reduktion-der-co2-emissionen/ [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16161444481140
Loading
Enrichment of Integrated Steel Plant Process Gases with Implementation of Renewable Energy
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 65, 453 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651321X16161444481140
/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16161444481140
/content/journals/10.1595/205651321X16161444481140
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error