Skip to content
1887
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Johnson Matthey Technology Review
  4. Volume 67, Issue 1
  5. Article
Volume 67, Issue 1
  • ISSN: 2056-5135
file format pdf download PDF

  • oa Evaluation of Antibacterial Potencies of Eight Lichen Extracts Against Gram-Positive Moderately Halophilic Bacteria

    Ecological materials to control moderately halophilic bacteria for leather preservation

  • Authors: Orcun Toksoz1, Ipek Turkmenoglu1, Didem Berber2, Pinar Caglayan3, Meral Birbir3 and Nuzhet Cenk Sesal3
  • Affiliations: 1 Biology Department, Institute of Pure and Applied Sciences, Marmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey 2 Gastronomy and Culinary Arts Department, Faculty of Fine Arts, Maltepe UniversityMarmara Egitim Koyu, IstanbulTurkey 3 Department of Biology, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Marmara UniversityIstanbulTurkey
  • Source: Johnson Matthey Technology Review, Volume 67, Issue 1, Jan 2023, p. 85 - 96
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499
    • Received: 11 Sep 2021
    • Accepted: 20 Jan 2022
    • Published online: 20 Jan 2022

Abstract

The leather sector has global economic importance. Overcoming microbiological problems, especially arising from halophilic bacteria, will greatly reduce product losses. In this study, lichen species including sp., and were examined for their antibacterial efficacies against subsp. (TR5) and (KV3) which are proteolytic and lipolytic Gram-positive moderately halophilic bacteria. The extracts of and had no antibacterial efficacy against the test bacteria. On the other hand, the extracts of , , sp. and had considerable antibacterial effect with varying percentages of inhibition. The maximum inhibition ratios at the tested concentrations of 15–240 μg ml–1 for lichen samples of sp. and were detected as 94.72 ± 0.75%, 76.10 ± 1.85%, 99.36 ± 0.04%, 89.49 ± 2.26% for TR5 and 97.44 ± 0.14%, 95.92 ± 0.29%, 97.97 ± 0.39%, 97.58 ± 0.53% for KV3, respectively. The most remarkable suppression was obtained with sp. extracts against KV3. These results indicate the need for further studies investigating the applicability of these natural resources to control moderately halophilic bacteria in the preservation of raw hides and skins.

© Johnson Matthey
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499
2022-01-20
2024-12-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/67/1/Toksov_16a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. M. A. Moktadir, H. B. Ahmadi, R. Sultana, F.-T. Zohra, J. J. H. Liou, J. Rezaei, J. Clean. Prod., 2020, 251, 119737 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119737 [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Wu, L. Zhao, X. Liu, W. Chen, H. Gu, J. Clean. Prod., 2017, 148, 158 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.113 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. S. Vankar, A. K. Dwivedi, Desalination, 2009, 249, (1), 158 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.08.011 [Google Scholar]
  4. O. Ozyaral, M. Birbir, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2005, 89, (6), 237 [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. Birbir, S. Anik, M. Birbir, P. Caglayan, Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2015, 59, (2), 109 LINK https://technology.matthey.com/article/59/2/109-119/ [Google Scholar]
  6. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2017, 112,(6), 207 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3763 [Google Scholar]
  7. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, Turk. J. Biochem., 2018, 43, (3), 312 LINK https://doi.org/10.1515/tjb-2017-0127 [Google Scholar]
  8. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, A. Ventosa, ‘A Survey Study to Detect Problems on Salted Hides and Skins’, ICAMS 2018: 7th International Conference on Advanced Materials and Systems, Bucharest, Romania, 18th–20th October, 2018, pp. 409–414 LINK https://doi.org/10.24264/icams-2018.viii.4 [Google Scholar]
  9. E. Yilmaz, M. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2019, 114, (4), 118 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/1590 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Birbir, P. Caglayan, Y. Birbir, Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2020, 64, (4), 489 LINK https://technology.matthey.com/article/64/4/489-503/ [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Birbir, K. Kizilkaya, P. Caglayan, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2021, 105, (5), 237 [Google Scholar]
  12. W. E. Kallenberger, R. M. Lollar, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1986, 81, (8), 248 [Google Scholar]
  13. D. G. Bailey, M. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 1993, 88, (8), 291 [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Birbir, J. Turk. Microbiol. Soc., 1997, 27, 68 [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Akpolat, A. Ventosa, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, P. Caglayan, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2015, 110, (07), 211 LINK https://journals.uc.edu/index.php/JALCA/article/view/3622 [Google Scholar]
  16. A. Ramos-Cormenzana, L. I. Hochstein, ‘Ecology of Moderately Halophilic Bacteria’, in “The Biology of Halophilic Bacteria”, eds. R. H. Vreeland, CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton, USA, 1993, 32 pp [Google Scholar]
  17. F. Mohammadipanah, J. Hamedi, M. Dehhaghi, M. Saraf, ‘Halophilic Bacteria: Potentials and Applications in Biotechnology’, in “Halophiles: Biodiversity and Sustainable Exploitation”, eds. D. K. Maheshwari, Springer International Publishing, Dordrecht, Switzerland, 2015, pp. 277–321 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14595-2_11 [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Sanchez-Porro, S. Martin, E. Mellado, A. Ventosa, J. Appl. Microbiol., 2003, 94, (2), 295 LINK https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.01834.x [Google Scholar]
  19. R. Rohban, M. A. Amoozegar, A. Ventosa, J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 2009, 36, (3), 333 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10295-008-0500-0 [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Ventosa, J. J. Nieto, A. Oren, Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev., 1998, 62, (2) LINK https://doi.org/10.1128/mmbr.62.2.504-544.1998 [Google Scholar]
  21. R. R. de la Haba, P. Yilmaz, C. Sánchez-Porro, M. Birbir, A. Ventosa, Syst. Appl. Microbiol., 2011, 34, (6), 435 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2011.04.002 [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Sánchez-Porro, P. Yilmaz, R. R. de la Haba, M. Birbir, A. Ventosa, Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol., 2011, 61, (5), 1206 LINK https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.024778-0 [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Caglayan, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, M. Birbir, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2015, 99, (5), 250 [Google Scholar]
  24. Y. Birbir, M. Birbir, J. Electrostat., 2006, 64, (12), 791 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elstat.2006.01.006 [Google Scholar]
  25. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, A. Ogan, A. Ventosa, C. Sánchez-Porro, Y. Birbir, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2019, 100,(5), 307 [Google Scholar]
  26. S. A. Hussain, M. I. Sarker, H. O. Yosief, Lett. Appl. Microbiol., 2020, 70, (3), 159 LINK https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.13250 [Google Scholar]
  27. D. Berber, İ. Türkmenoğlu, N. C. Sesal, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2020, 115, (10), 365 LINK https://doi.org/10.34314/jalca.v115i10.4174 [Google Scholar]
  28. D. Berber, İ. Türkmenoğlu, N. C. Sesal, Johnson Matthey Technol. Rev., 2020, 64, (4), 480 LINK https://technology.matthey.com/article/64/4/480-488/ [Google Scholar]
  29. D. Berber, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2020, 115, (03), 96 LINK https://doi.org/10.34314/jalca.v115i03.1627 [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Berber, Int. J. Adv. Eng. Pure Sci., 2020, 32, (3), 251 LINK https://doi.org/10.7240/jeps.633056 [Google Scholar]
  31. D. Berber, İ. Türkmenoğlu, M. Birbir, N. C. Sesal, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2020, 115, (6), 222 LINK https://doi.org/10.34314/jalca.v115i6.3820 [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Aptroot, B. J. Coppins, A. Fletcher, O. L. Gilbert, P. W. James, P. A. Wolseley, “The Lichens of Great Britain and Ireland”, eds. C. W. Smith, The British Lichen Society, London, UK, 2009, 1046 pp [Google Scholar]
  33. M. Birbir, S. Eryilmaz, A. Ogan, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2004, 88, (3), 99 [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Birbir, S. Eryilmaz, J. Soc. Leather Technol. Chem., 2007, 91, (2), 69 [Google Scholar]
  35. R. H. Vreeland, D. G. Bailey, R. W. Claunch, The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of Agriculture, Washington, DC, USA and Southeast Applied Research, New Orleans, USA, US Patent 5,945,027; 1999
  36. A. G. Gehring, D. G. Bailey, R. F. Caveng, R. H. Vreeland, J. Liq. Chromatogr. Relat. Technol., 2003, 26, (7), 1041 LINK https://doi.org/10.1081/jlc-120020091 [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Caglayan, Y. Birbir, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, ‘PP 13: Inactivation of Antibiotic-Resistant Species Belonging to Staphylococcus, Bacillus, Gracilibacillus and Idiomarina via Electric Current’, Fourth International Meeting on Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Istanbul, Turkey, 18th–21st September, 2014, Marmara University, Faculty of Pharmacy, Istanbul, Turkey, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  38. P. Caglayan, M. Birbir, C. Sánchez-Porro, A. Ventosa, Y. Birbir, J. Am. Leather Chem. Assoc., 2018, 113, (2), 41 [Google Scholar]
  39. V. Sivakumar, R. Mohan, T. Rangasamy, C. Muralidharan, Indian J. Nat. Prod. Resour., 2016, 7, (1), 65 LINK https://doi.org/10.56042/ijnpr.v7i1.10554 [Google Scholar]
  40. N. Aoussar, F. E. Laasri, M. Bourhia, N. Manoljovic, R. A. Mhand, N. Rhallabi, R. Ullah, A. A. Shahat, O. M. Noman, F. A. Nasr, O. M. Almarfadi, M. El Mzibri, P. Vasiljević, L. Benbacer, F. Mellouki, Evidence-Based Complement. Altern. Med., 2020, 8104538 LINK https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8104538 [Google Scholar]
  41. A. Sepahvand, E. Studzińska-Sroka, P. Ramak, V. Karimian, J. Ethnopharmacol., 2021, 268, 113656 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jep.2020.113656 [Google Scholar]
  42. N. Aoussar, R. Manzali, I. Nattah, N. Rhallabi, P. Vasiljevic, M. Bouksaim, A. Douira, N. Manojlović, F. Mellouki, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 2017, 8, (6), 1968 LINK https://www.jmaterenvironsci.com/Document/vol8/vol8_N6/209-JMES-3212-Aoussar.pdf [Google Scholar]
  43. N. Aoussar, M. Achmit, Y. Es-sadeqy, P. Vasiljević, N. Rhallabi, R. A. Mhand, K. Zerouali, N. Manojlović, F. Mellouki, Arch. Microbiol., 2021, 203, (6), 2887 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-021-02288-5 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499
Loading
Evaluation of Antibacterial Potencies of Eight Lichen Extracts Against Gram-Positive Moderately Halophilic Bacteria
Johnson Matthey Technology Review 67, 85 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499
/content/journals/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499
/content/journals/10.1595/205651323X16426780863499
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Research Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test