Skip to content
1887
Volume 69, Issue 3
  • ISSN: 2056-5135

Abstract

Solar power is the primary renewable energy solution for alleviating power shortages in developing areas. Leveraging this energy faces constraints arising from specific environmental conditions. Challenges in solar tracking systems include maintaining accuracy under varying environmental conditions, such as changes in sunlight, weather shadows and ensuring reliable performance while minimising energy consumption and mechanical wear. To address these challenges, solar tracking technology is employed. Solar trackers are pivotal in optimising power generation from photovoltaic panels, offering a range of drive types and control strategies to enhance efficiency. This review aims to explore various solar tracking systems to improve the efficiency of solar power generation. We compare the tracking approaches, performance, advantages and disadvantages of different tracking systems. Additionally, this review presents and categorises various types of solar tracking systems according to the technologies and methods of operation, focusing primarily on image processing-based solar tracking systems. Utilising image processing technology in solar tracking systems provides innovative approaches to enhance energy generation from photovoltaic panels. These techniques enable precise detection of the sun’s position, even under challenging environmental conditions, ultimately enhancing efficiency and reliability.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license. You are free to: share: copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format; adapt: remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially. Under the following terms: attribution: you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1595/205651325X17271929252761
2025-07-01
2025-05-31
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/jmtr/69/3/Mahalle_13a_Imp.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1595/205651325X17271929252761&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. S. A. S. Eldin, M. S. Abd-Elhady, H. A. Kandil, Renew. Energy, 2016, 85, 228 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.06.051
    [Google Scholar]
  2. A. Barbón, J. A. Fernández-Rubiera, L. Martínez-Valledor, A. Pérez-Fernández, L. Bayón, Appl. Energy, 2021, 285, 116477 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116477
    [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Hadroug, A. Iratni, A. Hafaifa, A. Boudjemline, O. S. Alshammari, H. Jerbi, I. Colak, X. Chen, J. Electr. Eng. Technol., 2023, 18, (4), 2943 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s42835-023-01411-4
    [Google Scholar]
  4. H. Fathabadi, Sol. Energy, 2016, 138, 67 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.09.009
    [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Gora, T. Akkan, Sensors, 2023, 23, (8), 3838 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/s23083838
    [Google Scholar]
  6. R. McCluney, Appl. Opt., 1983, 22, (21), 3433 LINK https://doi.org/10.1364/ao.22.003433
    [Google Scholar]
  7. A. K. Singh, D. B. Singh, A. Mallick, Harender, S. K. Sharma, N. Kumar, V. K. Dwivedi, Sol. Energy, 2019, 185, 146 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2019.04.040
    [Google Scholar]
  8. N. H. A. Rahim, M. A. Saifuddin, M. M. Bahurdin, ‘Performance Analysis on an Arduino-Based Low-Cost Active Dual-Axis Solar Tracking System’, in “Materials and Technologies for Future Advancement”, eds. A. Ismail, F. N. Zulkipli, S. Yaakup, A. Öchsner, Springer, Cham, Switzerland, 2023, pp 189198 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-38993-1_18
    [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Fathabadi, Renew. Energy, 2016, 95, 485 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.063
    [Google Scholar]
  10. C.-K. Yang, T.-C. Cheng, C.-H. Cheng, C.-C. Wang, C.-C. Lee, Sol. Energy, 2017, 147, 52 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2017.03.014
    [Google Scholar]
  11. R. C. Allil, A. Manchego, A. Allil, I. Rodrigues, A. Werneck, G. C. Diaz, F. T. Dino, Y. Reyes, M. Werneck, Sol. Energy, 2018, 174, 648 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.09.061
    [Google Scholar]
  12. M. R. Rezoug, R. Chenni, Int. J. Eng. Sci. Res. Technol., 2018, 7, (3), 710 LINK https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1207028
    [Google Scholar]
  13. J. Ruelas, F. Muñoz, B. Lucero, J. Palomares, Appl. Sci., 2019, 9, (5), 894 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/app9050894
    [Google Scholar]
  14. O. M. Pışırır, O. Bıngöl, Acta Phys. Pol. A, 2016, 130, (1), 36 LINK https://doi.org/10.12693/aphyspola.130.36
    [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Boujoudar, I. Bouarfa, M. El Ydrissi, M. Abraim, O. El Alani, E. G. Bennouna, H. Ghennioui, ‘Design and Development of a Low-Cost Single-Axis Solar Tracking System’, in “Performance Enhancement and Control of Photovoltaic Systems”, eds S. Motahhir, M. E. H. Assad, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2024 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-443-13392-3.00018-9
    [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Sensen, L. Yanbing, Z. Zhiqi, W. Fan, ‘Research on Active Disturbance Rejection Control Technology of Solar Panel Based on Harmonic Drive’, 2023 China Automation Congress, Chongqing, China, 17th–19th November, 2023, IEEE, Piscataway, USA, 2023, pp. 13741380 LINK https://doi.org/10.1109/cac59555.2023.10452136
    [Google Scholar]
  17. N. AL-Rousan, N. A. Mat Isa, M. K. Mat Desa, J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci., 2020, 32, (7), 459 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2020.04.004
    [Google Scholar]
  18. M. H. M. Sidek, N. Azis, W. Z. W. Hasan, M. Z. A. Ab Kadir, S. Shafie, M. A. M. Radzi, Energy, 2017, 124, 160 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.001
    [Google Scholar]
  19. J. Canada-Bago, J.-A. Fernandez-Prieto, M.-A. Gadeo-Martos, P. Perez-Higueras, Sensors, 2020, 20, (5), 1315 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/s20051315
    [Google Scholar]
  20. B. E. Tarazona-Romero, A. Campos-Celador, C. L. Sandoval-Rodriguez, J. G. Ascanio-Villabona, A. D. Rincon-Quintero, Period. Eng. Nat. Sci., 2021, 9, (4), 778
    [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Manosroi, P. Prompattra, P. Kerngburee, Energy Rep., 2020, 6, (9), 9 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2020.10.029
    [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Morón, D. Ferrández, P. Saiz, G. Vega, J. P. Díaz, Energies, 2017, 10, (9), 1298 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/en10091298
    [Google Scholar]
  23. F. M. Hoffmann, R. F. Molz, J. V. Kothe, E. O. B. Nara, L. P. C. Tedesco, Renew. Energy, 2018, 115, 750 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.079
    [Google Scholar]
  24. C. Jamroen, P. Komkum, S. Kohsri, W. Himananto, S. Panupintu, S. Unkat, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2020, 37, 100618 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2019.100618
    [Google Scholar]
  25. M. E. H. Chowdhury, A. Khandakar, B. Hossain, R. Abouhasera, J. Sensors, 2019, (1), 3681031 LINK https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3681031
    [Google Scholar]
  26. E. Normanyo, A. R. Awingot, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., 2016, 14, (4), 1 LINK https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2016/22955
    [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Ghassoul, Energy Rep., 2018, 4, 520 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2018.07.001
    [Google Scholar]
  28. S. Motahhir, A. EL Hammoumi, A. EL Ghzizal, A. Derouich, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 2019, 31, 9 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2018.11.003
    [Google Scholar]
  29. A. A. Okandeji, M. B. Olajide, G. O. Olasunkanmi, Z. O. Jagun, Niger. J. Technol., 2020, 39, (3), 871 LINK https://doi.org/10.4314/njt.v39i3.29
    [Google Scholar]
  30. R. N. Hasanah, A. B. Setyawan, E. Maulana, T. Nurwati, T. Taufik, Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst., 2020, 11, (2), 743 LINK https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v11.i2.pp743-751
    [Google Scholar]
  31. D. A. Flores-Hernández, S. Palomino-Resendiz, N. Lozada-Castillo, A. Luviano-Juárez, I. Chairez, Mechatronics, 2017, 47, 148 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mechatronics.2017.09.014
    [Google Scholar]
  32. E. Kiyak, G. Gol, Renew. Wind Water Sol., 2016, 3, 7
    [Google Scholar]
  33. T. Salameh, C. Ghenai, A. Merabet, M. Alkasrawi, Energy, 2020, 190, 116475 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.116475
    [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Abdollahpour, M. R. Golzarian, A. Rohani, H. Abootorabi Zarchi, Sol. Energy, 2018, 169, 136 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2018.03.059
    [Google Scholar]
  35. H. Kang, T. Hong, M. Lee, Energy Build., 2019, 190, 34 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.02.013
    [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Burhan, S. J. Oh, K. J. E. Chua, K. C. Ng, Sol. Energy, 2016, 137, 352 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2016.08.035
    [Google Scholar]
  37. J. Zhang, Z. Yin, P. Jin, Energy, 2019, 182, 585 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2019.06.032
    [Google Scholar]
  38. K.-H. Kim, S.-B. Cho, Appl. Soft Comput., 2019, 83, 105618 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.105618
    [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Kannan, I. S. I. Singh, ‘Power Performance Analysis of Solar Tracking System in UTP’, in “Advanced Methods for Processing and Visualizing the Renewable Energy”, eds S. A. A. Karim, N. Saad, R. Kannan, Springer, Singapore, 2020, pp 4757 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-8606-4_3
    [Google Scholar]
  40. K. Kumba, S. P. Simon, K. Sundareswaran, P. S. R. Nayak, K. A. Kumar, N. P. Padhy, IEEE J. Photovoltaics, 2022, 12, (5), 1219 LINK https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2022.3187647
    [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Zhao, E. Xu, Z. Wang, Q. Yu, L. Xu, L. Zhu, Renew. Energy, 2016, 94, 197 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.036
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Y. Shi, D. Toghraie, F. Nadi, G. Ahmadi, A. Alizadeh, L. Zhang, Environ. Dev. Sustain., 2021, 23, (12), 17329 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01368-2
    [Google Scholar]
  43. L. Masevhe, E. N. Maluta, Cogent Eng., 2022, 9, (1), 2105031 LINK https://doi.org/10.1080/23311916.2022.2105031
    [Google Scholar]
  44. R. Singh, S. Kumar, A. Gehlot, R. Pachauri, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 2018, 82, (3), 3263 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.018
    [Google Scholar]
  45. A. A. Rahimoon, M. N. Abdullah, D. M. Soomro, M. Y. Nassar, Z. A. Memon, P. H. Shaikh, Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 2020, 17, (2), 914 LINK https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v17.i2.pp914-921
    [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Kumar, R. Ranjan, N. K. Poddar, B. Kumar, A. Kumar, S. Kumar, N. Kumar, A. Kumar, S. Kumar, ‘Manual Solar Tracking System with Two Degrees of Freedom’ in “Optimization of Industrial Systems”, eds D. Panchal, M. Tyagi, A. Sachdeva, D. Pamucar, Ch. 17, John Wiley & Sons Inc, Hoboken, USA, 2022 LINK https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119755074.ch17
    [Google Scholar]
  47. U. Mamodiya, N. Tiwari, Comput. Electr. Eng., 2023, 111, (A), 108920 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2023.108920
    [Google Scholar]
  48. A. Saymbetov, S. Mekhilef, N. Kuttybay, M. Nurgaliyev, D. Tukymbekov, A. Meiirkhanov, G. Dosymbetova, Y. Svanbayev, Sol. Energy, 2021, 224, 285 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2021.06.024
    [Google Scholar]
  49. S. C. Singh, M. ElKabbash, Z. Li, X. Li, B. Regmi, M. Madsen, S. A. Jalil, Z. Zhan, J. Zhang, C. Guo, Nat. Sustain., 2020, 3, (11), 938 LINK https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0566-x
    [Google Scholar]
  50. C. Jamroen, C. Fongkerd, W. Krongpha, P. Komkum, A. Pirayawaraporn, N. Chindakham, Appl. Energy, 2021, 299, 117295 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117295
    [Google Scholar]
  51. A. Pirayawaraporn, S. Sappaniran, S. Nooraksa, C. Prommai, N. Chindakham, C. Jamroen, Appl. Energy, 2023, 338, 120946 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.120946
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Z. Ahmad, S. Sharief, Int. J. Recent Trends Eng. Res., 2017, 3, (3), 325
    [Google Scholar]
  53. A. Ruelas, N. Velázquez, C. Villa-Angulo, A. Acuña, P. Rosales, J. Suastegui, Sensors, 2017, 17, (8), 1742 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/s17081742
    [Google Scholar]
  54. N. K. Kumar, V. Subramaniam, Eng. J., 2018, 22, (1), 15 LINK https://doi.org/10.4186/ej.2018.22.1.15
    [Google Scholar]
  55. L. A. S. Ferreira, H. J. Loschi, A. A. D. Rodriguez, Y. Iano, D. A. do Nascimento, J. Sol. Energy Eng., 2018, 140, (2), 021010 LINK https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4039094
    [Google Scholar]
  56. A. K. Patel, Corros. Protec., 2023, 51, (2), 244
    [Google Scholar]
  57. C.-C. Wei, Y.-C. Song, C.-C. Chang, C.-B. Lin, Sensors, 2016, 16, (12), 1995 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/s16121995
    [Google Scholar]
  58. R. Abd Rahim, M. N. S. Zainudin, M. M. Ismail, M. A. Othman, J. Multidiscip. Eng. Sci. Technol., 2014, 1, (5), 369 LINK https://www.jmest.org/wp-content/uploads/JMESTN42350280.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  59. J. M. Banda, R. A. Angryk, P. C. Martens, ‘On the Surprisingly Accurate Transfer of Image Parameters Between Medical and Solar Images’, 18th IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, Brussels, Belgium, 11th–14th September, 2011, IEEE, Piscataway, USA, 2011, pp. 36693672 LINK https://doi.org/10.1109/icip.2011.6116515
    [Google Scholar]
  60. M. Mishra, P. B. Dash, J. Nayak, B. Naik, S. K. Swain, Measurement, 2020, 166, 108250 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108250
    [Google Scholar]
  61. S. F. Stefenon, C. Kasburg, R. Z. Freire, F. C. Silva Ferreira, D. W. Bertol, A. Nied, J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 2021, 40, (1), 1083 LINK https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-201279
    [Google Scholar]
  62. C. I. Uga, B. Adhikari, D. Teferi, Geomagn. Aeron., 2023, 63, (6), 818 LINK https://doi.org/10.1134/s0016793223600418
    [Google Scholar]
  63. P. K. Dash, I. Majumder, N. Nayak, R. Bisoi, Nat. Resour. Res., 2020, 29, (5), 2813 LINK https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-020-09630-6
    [Google Scholar]
  64. P. Poudel, N. Parajuli, A. Gautam, D. Sapkota, H. Adhikari, B. Adhikari, A. Silwal, S. P. Gautam, M. Karki, R. K. Mishra, J. Nepal Phys. Soc., 2020, 6, (2), 104 LINK https://doi.org/10.3126/jnphyssoc.v6i2.34865
    [Google Scholar]
  65. J. Oloketuyi, Y. Liu, A. C. Amanambu, M. Zhao, Adv. Astron., 2020, 3527570 LINK https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3527570
    [Google Scholar]
  66. K. Sujatha, N. P. G. Bhavani, K. Krishnakumar, U. Jayalatsumi, T. Kavitha, K. S. Kumar, ‘Renewable Energy Source Technology with Geo-Spatial-Based Intelligent Vision Sensing and Monitoring System for Solar Aerators in Fish Ponds’, in “Enabling Methodologies for Renewable and Sustainable Energy”, eds G. Saini, R. Kannan, E. Benini, K. Kumar, ch. 8, CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA, 2023, 20 pp LINK https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003272717-8
    [Google Scholar]
  67. M. Ahmed, M. Abdelrahem, R. Kennel, Sustainability, 2020, 12, (11), 4542 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114542
    [Google Scholar]
  68. J. R. de A. Bruzadin Filho, R. R. Tiferes, S. G. Di Santo, IEEE J. Photovoltaics, 2023, 13, (6), 929 LINK https://doi.org/10.1109/jphotov.2023.3317968
    [Google Scholar]
  69. M. Adnan, A. A. A. Lathief, P. R. Sivadeep, A. Ganga, S. Raj, Int. J. Adv. Res. Innov. Technol., 2021, 7, (4), 1864 LINK https://www.ijariit.com/manuscripts/v7i4/V7I4-1911.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  70. K. Kumar, L. Varshney, A. Ambikapathy, I. Ali, A. Rajput, A. Bhatnagar, S. Omar, Int. J. Power Electron. Drive Syst., 2021, 12, (3), 1431 LINK https://doi.org/10.11591/ijpeds.v12.i3.pp1431-1438
    [Google Scholar]
  71. F. M. A. Lorilla, R. Barroca, Indones. J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 2022, 26, (3), 1368 LINK https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v26.i3.pp1368-1378
    [Google Scholar]
  72. K. S. Gaeid, M. N. Uddin, M. K. Mohamed, O. N. Mohmmoud, Tikrit J. Eng. Sci., 2020, 27, (2), 71 LINK https://doi.org/10.25130/tjes.27.2.09
    [Google Scholar]
  73. G. Garcia-Gil, J. M. Ramirez, Heliyon, 2019, 5, (3), e01398 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01398
    [Google Scholar]
  74. M. W. Akram, G. Li, Y. Jin, X. Chen, C. Zhu, A. Ahmad, Sol. Energy, 2020, 198, 175 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.01.055
    [Google Scholar]
  75. G. Li, F. Wang, F. Feng, B. Wei, Sensors, 2022, 22, (13), 4951 LINK https://doi.org/10.3390/s22134951
    [Google Scholar]
  76. M. U. Ali, H. F. Khan, M. Masud, K. D. Kallu, A. Zafar, Sol. Energy, 2020, 208, 643 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2020.08.027
    [Google Scholar]
  77. A. S. Al-Waisy, D. A. Ibrahim, D. A. Zebari, S. Hammadi, H. Mohammed, M. A. Mohammed, R. Damaševičius, PeerJ. Comput. Sci., 2022, 8, e992 LINK https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj-cs.992
    [Google Scholar]
  78. X. Qian, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. Wu, Z. Diao, Q.-E Wu, C. Yang, Int. J. Perform. Eng., 2017, 13, (7), 1048 LINK https://doi.org/10.23940/ijpe.17.07.p6.10481056
    [Google Scholar]
  79. D. J. K. Kishore, M. R. Mohamed, K. Sudhakar, K. Peddakapu, Appl. Soft Comput., 2024, 165, 112030 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2024.112030
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Z. Si, M. Yang, Y. Yu, T. Ding, Appl. Energy, 2021, 302, 117514 LINK https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117514
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1595/205651325X17271929252761
Loading
/content/journals/10.1595/205651325X17271929252761
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error
Please enter a valid_number test